Cliven Bundy Arrested ....

Salinsky wrote:.... finally.

Seize all his property and throw the book at him.

Asswipe.

Cliven Bundy, the Nevada rancher who touched off one armed showdown with federal authorities and applauded another started in Oregon by his sons, was arrested late Wednesday at Portland International Airport and faces federal charges related to the 2014 standoff at his ranch.

Bundy, 74, was booked into the downtown Multnomah County jail at 10:54 p.m.

He faces a conspiracy charge to interfere with a federal officer — the same charge lodged against two of his sons, Ammon and Ryan, for their role in the Jan. 2 takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Burns. He also faces weapons charges…

The last four occupiers, who have camped alone since Jan. 28 at the headquarters compound, agreed Wednesday night to surrender in the morning. They did so after FBI tactical teams infiltrated refuge buildings undetected overnight Tuesday and into Wednesday. The FBI then hemmed in the occupiers with armored vehicles and negotiated with them for five hours to reach the surrender agreement…

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/02/nevada_rancher_cliven_bundy_de.html#incart_story_package

Markle wrote:So?

Salinsky wrote:

Markle wrote:So?

Justice.

PkrBum wrote:They're both protesting what they consider unfair treatment... whether real or perceived.

Are you against that in whole or just for those with which you disagree?

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

No baby, the slippery slope is you and your demented partner Markle not being able to tell the difference between an armed insurrection against the United States of America -- treason, if you will -- and a race riot.  Both were illegal -- but only one was treason.

Fuck demented cowboys with guns.

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

No baby, the slippery slope is you and your demented partner Markle not being able to tell the difference between an armed insurrection against the United States of America -- treason, if you will -- and a race riot.  Both were illegal -- but only one was treason.

Fuck demented cowboys with guns.

Which would you say caused more harm?

Which destroyed more property?

Which committed more crimes?

Which most displaced and inconvenienced innocent citizens?

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

No baby, the slippery slope is you and your demented partner Markle not being able to tell the difference between an armed insurrection against the United States of America -- treason, if you will -- and a race riot.  Both were illegal -- but only one was treason.

Fuck demented cowboys with guns.

Which would you say caused more harm?

Which destroyed more property?

Which committed more crimes?

Which most displaced and inconvenienced innocent citizens?

All of which has nothing whatever to do with the issue. The riots didn't last and never threatened overthrowing the government by force -- for political reasons.

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

No baby, the slippery slope is you and your demented partner Markle not being able to tell the difference between an armed insurrection against the United States of America -- treason, if you will -- and a race riot.  Both were illegal -- but only one was treason.

Fuck demented cowboys with guns.

Which would you say caused more harm?

Which destroyed more property?

Which committed more crimes?

Which most displaced and inconvenienced innocent citizens?

All of which has nothing whatever to do with the issue.  The riots didn't last and never threatened overthrowing the government by force -- for political reasons.  

Ya... one took over a remote outpost as a symbolic protest... the other took over their town and ruined private property... closed enterprise... and terrorized the populace. But which riled your leftist sensibilities? Ya... very objective of you.

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Bs... the federal govt has been progressively infringing on the ranchers via numerous means. The point really is that you agree with one cause and not the other... instead of respecting the right to protest for all.  That is a slippery slope comrade.

No baby, the slippery slope is you and your demented partner Markle not being able to tell the difference between an armed insurrection against the United States of America -- treason, if you will -- and a race riot.  Both were illegal -- but only one was treason.

Fuck demented cowboys with guns.

Which would you say caused more harm?

Which destroyed more property?

Which committed more crimes?

Which most displaced and inconvenienced innocent citizens?

All of which has nothing whatever to do with the issue.  The riots didn't last and never threatened overthrowing the government by force -- for political reasons.  

Floridatexan wrote:
The Bundy's were breaking the law...there is no doubt and no grey area.  In each case, they initiated the conflict...they were armed and they took over a federal facility.  They were "prepared to die".  

Markle wrote: