Home
Okay, first of all just to simply matters we're going to refer to the inside job conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center with "controlled demolition" as simply "Dick Cheney". It can be any number of bad guys from the illuminatti, the globalists, the New World Order, the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the Trilateral Commission, or whatever. But to avoid all that confusion we're just gonna refer to it as "Dick Cheney" since he's usualy cited as one of the ringleaders anyway.
There is another thread up now by Teo which has the title..
Jessie kicks limey Pier's ass
... and the title refers to an appearance by Jesse Ventura on the Piers Morgan tv show.
In this interview, Jesse Ventura's main evidence for the theory that 9-11 was a Dick Cheney inside job, is that a BBC tv reporter reported that WTC 7 collapsed, but, when she reported this, it was about a half hour BEFORE the collapse actually occurred. So Jesse's eyes are all lit up when he tells Piers this is the proof that it was all engineered by Dick Cheney.
The first thing that pops into Ventura's mind, is that this could not have happened unless the reporter had been fed the info of the impending collapse BEFORE the building was "imploded".
The problem is, nothing else pops into Ventura's mind after this. And that's after even 12 years since this all happened. The only thing that is still in his mind is this could not have happened unless the reporter had been fed the info of the impending collapse BEFORE the building was "imploded".
That's what I mean by how these folk never think this stuff through.
Because the next thing which would occur to any thinking person, is to ask one's self... why on earth would Dick Cheney inform a BBC tv reporter that the building was going to collapse before he imploded it? For what earthly reason would Dick want to do that? To what purpose? To benefit him how?
That makes less sense than anything I have ever heard of in my life.
All Dick need do is let the BBC tv reporter see the building be imploded and of course then the BBC tv reporter along with everyone else on planet Earth would know the building had collapsed.
Why in the name of God would Dick want to risk exposing the plot by doing anything else? To gain what?
That's what I mean by how these folk never seem to think these claims and these theories through. And this is just one example. Over the half decade I've been listening to these claims and these theories, I have seen this same thing happen countless times. Over and over again. Never do they think anything about this stuff through.
There is another thread up now by Teo which has the title..
Jessie kicks limey Pier's ass
... and the title refers to an appearance by Jesse Ventura on the Piers Morgan tv show.
In this interview, Jesse Ventura's main evidence for the theory that 9-11 was a Dick Cheney inside job, is that a BBC tv reporter reported that WTC 7 collapsed, but, when she reported this, it was about a half hour BEFORE the collapse actually occurred. So Jesse's eyes are all lit up when he tells Piers this is the proof that it was all engineered by Dick Cheney.
The first thing that pops into Ventura's mind, is that this could not have happened unless the reporter had been fed the info of the impending collapse BEFORE the building was "imploded".
The problem is, nothing else pops into Ventura's mind after this. And that's after even 12 years since this all happened. The only thing that is still in his mind is this could not have happened unless the reporter had been fed the info of the impending collapse BEFORE the building was "imploded".
That's what I mean by how these folk never think this stuff through.
Because the next thing which would occur to any thinking person, is to ask one's self... why on earth would Dick Cheney inform a BBC tv reporter that the building was going to collapse before he imploded it? For what earthly reason would Dick want to do that? To what purpose? To benefit him how?
That makes less sense than anything I have ever heard of in my life.
All Dick need do is let the BBC tv reporter see the building be imploded and of course then the BBC tv reporter along with everyone else on planet Earth would know the building had collapsed.
Why in the name of God would Dick want to risk exposing the plot by doing anything else? To gain what?
That's what I mean by how these folk never seem to think these claims and these theories through. And this is just one example. Over the half decade I've been listening to these claims and these theories, I have seen this same thing happen countless times. Over and over again. Never do they think anything about this stuff through.
