Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Confirmed: FOX News lied about Benghazi to hurt Hillary.

Confirmed: FOX News lied about Benghazi to hurt Hillary.

+7
Floridatexan
dumpcare
Vikingwoman
Wordslinger
EmeraldGhost
boards of FL
TEOTWAWKI
11 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

So what's new? Is there anybody here who doesn't know the whole Benghazi investigation is nothing more than a bogus attempt to smear Hillary? Does anybody here believe that FOX never lies on purpose? LOL!

http://www.salon.com/2015/12/10/they_have_no_shame_its_confirmed_fox_news_lied_egregiously_again_in_its_latest_benghazi_bombshell/?source=newsletter

2seaoat



Follow the money, nations, and Oligarchy which depends on Fox News attempts to continually divide this nation and keep folk's minds off the economic reality for most Americans during the same period that Fox became a voice in America media. It's mission is simple. The results are obvious. We stand a nation divided and the exploiters are stealing this nation into the poor house.....nothing new.

Vikingwoman



It wasn't just Fox News. It was the repugs who lied also and spent millions of dollars to thwart her campaign just like they spent $58 million persecuting Bill Clinton for a BJ.

Guest


Guest

Does it surprise you when leftist propaganda tells you exactly what you so desperately want to hear and believe?

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

The old bat needs to be in a nursing home not the White house...

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:Does it surprise you when leftist propaganda tells you exactly what you so desperately want to hear and believe?


Yea, bra. It's like...fake, or something. It's not as if, like, that information is real or, like, anything. This stuff only, like, exists on, like, liberal leftists fascist commy, like, websites...and stuff. My high school civics teacher is, like, in the tea party...or something. And he, like, told me about Ron Paul. You guys are all, like, sheeple, and stuff.

Some degrees of stupid simply cannot be fixed. Watching an adult stumble their way through an online political discussion is kinda like watching a three legged dog tumble down the stairs. You want to laugh, but you know you shouldn't.

http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/news/press-releases/unredacted-email-debunks-rehashed-conservative-conspiracy-theory


_________________
I approve this message.

Vikingwoman



PkrBum wrote:Does it surprise you when leftist propaganda tells you exactly what you so desperately want to hear and believe?


It wasn't a leftist that told us that. It was a righwinger admitting it. Doesn't get any truer than that.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:So what's new?  Is there anybody here who doesn't know the whole Benghazi investigation is nothing more than a bogus attempt to smear Hillary?  Does anybody here believe that FOX never lies on purpose?  LOL!

http://www.salon.com/2015/12/10/they_have_no_shame_its_confirmed_fox_news_lied_egregiously_again_in_its_latest_benghazi_bombshell/?source=newsletter

Real desperation. No one here cited Fox News for the information you are feebly attempting to refute.

For the Progressives, this email was not made available to the previous seven investigations. If only semi-retired President Obama and Hillary Clinton did not lie so much. Little wonder they worked so hard to hide their communications.


The newly released email reads:

From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]
Subject: Libya

State colleagues:

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton].

After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us [REDACTED].

Jeremy

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-email-shows-dod-offered-state-department-forces-that-could-move-to-benghazi-immediately-specifics-blacked-out-in-new-document/

boards of FL

boards of FL

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:So what's new?  Is there anybody here who doesn't know the whole Benghazi investigation is nothing more than a bogus attempt to smear Hillary?  Does anybody here believe that FOX never lies on purpose?  LOL!

http://www.salon.com/2015/12/10/they_have_no_shame_its_confirmed_fox_news_lied_egregiously_again_in_its_latest_benghazi_bombshell/?source=newsletter

Real desperation.  No one here cited Fox News for the information you are feebly attempting to refute.

For the Progressives, this email was not made available to the previous seven investigations. If only semi-retired President Obama and Hillary Clinton did not lie so much. Little wonder they worked so hard to hide their communications.


The newly released email reads:

From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]
Subject: Libya

State colleagues:

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton].

After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us [REDACTED].

Jeremy

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-email-shows-dod-offered-state-department-forces-that-could-move-to-benghazi-immediately-specifics-blacked-out-in-new-document/

http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/news/press-releases/unredacted-email-debunks-rehashed-conservative-conspiracy-theory


_________________
I approve this message.

Markle

Markle

boards of FL wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:So what's new?  Is there anybody here who doesn't know the whole Benghazi investigation is nothing more than a bogus attempt to smear Hillary?  Does anybody here believe that FOX never lies on purpose?  LOL!

http://www.salon.com/2015/12/10/they_have_no_shame_its_confirmed_fox_news_lied_egregiously_again_in_its_latest_benghazi_bombshell/?source=newsletter

Real desperation.  No one here cited Fox News for the information you are feebly attempting to refute.

For the Progressives, this email was not made available to the previous seven investigations. If only semi-retired President Obama and Hillary Clinton did not lie so much. Little wonder they worked so hard to hide their communications.


The newly released email reads:

From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]
Subject: Libya

State colleagues:

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton].

After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us [REDACTED].

Jeremy

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-email-shows-dod-offered-state-department-forces-that-could-move-to-benghazi-immediately-specifics-blacked-out-in-new-document/

http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/news/press-releases/unredacted-email-debunks-rehashed-conservative-conspiracy-theory

Great source for an opinion piece. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md has run interference for Bill and Hillary for many years. Did you recall Congressman Cummings pushing IRS to give extra scrutiny to conservative organizations applying for non-profit status. Yep, great source, you're a terrific foil.

Dem. Elijah Cummings defends shocking emails showing he coordinated with IRS effort to target True the Vote
April 10, 2014 | Michael Dorstewitz

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/10/dem-elijah-cummings-defends-shocking-emails-showing-he-coordinated-with-irs-effort-to-target-true-the-vote-111723#ixzz3u4teDBL4

2seaoat



Too funny......the whole Benghazi political game crashed and burned.....even Pace before exiting realized all his predictions had crashed...but our two mules with blinders on still are pulling that wagon.......again....too funny.

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

Did the Hil' slut-shame the 12 year old little girl whose rapist she defended and got off back when she was an attorney in Little Rock, AR  when she by her own admission knew he was guilty as h*ll ... and then laugh about it afterwards?

Shame on Hillary Rodham Clinton, shame, shame!   And some people still think she oughta be our "first female President?'  ... well, shame on them too!

Has this country no sense of decency anymore?

2seaoat



when she by her own admission knew he was guilty as h*ll
sorry......you do not hire an attorney to be the judge or jury. You hire them to do their job. I wish folks finished civics.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

EmeraldGhost wrote:Did the Hil' slut-shame the 12 year old little girl whose rapist she defended and got off back when she was an attorney or Little Rock, AR  when she by her own admission knew he was guilty as h*ll ... and then laugh about it afterwards?

Shame on Hillary Rodham Clinton, shame, shame!   And people think she oughta be our "first female President?'  ... well, shame on them too!

Has this country no sense of decency anymore?


Answer: Trump now has a 34% lead in the republican presidential candidate race. Obviously, to all these folks, decency is so distant they can't remember what it was like anymore.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/10/dem-elijah-cummings-defends-shocking-emails-showing-he-coordinated-with-irs-effort-to-target-true-the-vote-111723#ixzz3u4teDBL4

An obscure wingnut blog.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Vikingwoman



Hil slut? Aww, come on man? That's so high schoolish. Besides she never laughed about it. That's already been debated. She's an atty. she did her job because he's entitled to a defense. Grow up.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
EmeraldGhost wrote:Did the Hil' slut-shame the 12 year old little girl whose rapist she defended and got off back when she was an attorney or Little Rock, AR  when she by her own admission knew he was guilty as h*ll ... and then laugh about it afterwards?

Shame on Hillary Rodham Clinton, shame, shame!   And people think she oughta be our "first female President?'  ... well, shame on them too!

Has this country no sense of decency anymore?

Answer:  Trump now has a 34% lead in the republican presidential candidate race.  Obviously, to all these folks, decency is so distant they can't remember what it was like anymore.

ALWAYS EASY to tell when Progressives realize they have again lost the argument. They feebly attempt to change the subject.

Thanks Wordslinger, you remain a most helpful foil!

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/10/dem-elijah-cummings-defends-shocking-emails-showing-he-coordinated-with-irs-effort-to-target-true-the-vote-111723#ixzz3u4teDBL4

An obscure wingnut blog.

Are the facts as put forth in the article true or false?

Proof positive. The Progressives make a feeble to deflect from the subject and instead, post things irrelevant to the subject at hand.

Once again for the Progressives, are the facts in the article put forth...TRUE OR FALSE.



Last edited by Markle on 12/13/2015, 12:06 am; edited 1 time in total

dumpcare



dumpcare



Floridatexan

Floridatexan


True the Vote is a right wing radical organization that has been caught numerous times trying to suppress voting. Judicial Watch may have had some credibility in the early days, but has now become nothing more than an echo chamber for right-wing ideas, which are as dead as Elvis.

Markle

Markle

AGAIN, Progressives are too cowardly to answer honestly...I am shocked...SHOCKED I SAY!

Let's try again!

Are the facts as put forth in the article true or false?

Proof positive. The Progressives make a feeble to deflect from the subject and instead, post things irrelevant to the subject at hand.

Once again for the Progressives, are the facts in the article put forth...TRUE OR FALSE.

2seaoat



False.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/10/dem-elijah-cummings-defends-shocking-emails-showing-he-coordinated-with-irs-effort-to-target-true-the-vote-111723#ixzz3u4teDBL4

An obscure wingnut blog.

Are the facts as put forth in the article true or false?

Proof positive.  The Progressives make a feeble to deflect from the subject and instead, post things irrelevant to the subject at hand.

Once again for the Progressives, are the facts in the article put forth...TRUE OR FALSE.

Semi-demented poster Markle does what I highlighted on a weekly basis, at least.  He likes to knock other people's sources, but then the ones he uses are always truthful and full of 'facts'.

Confirmed: FOX News lied about Benghazi to hurt Hillary. Laughi12

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:False.

What about this email is false?

The newly released email reads:

From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]
Subject: Libya

State colleagues:

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton].

After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us [REDACTED].

Jeremy

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-email-shows-dod-offered-state-department-forces-that-could-move-to-benghazi-immediately-specifics-blacked-out-in-new-document/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Confirmed: FOX News lied about Benghazi to hurt Hillary.

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum