The circular logic behind media coverage of the Clinton email story

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/19/the-circular-logic-behind-media-coverage-of-the-clinton-email-story/?

It's hard to know when there is truly a story; the GOP has shot itself in the foot with all its "scandals" and anti-Hillary rhetoric. When you cry wolf too many times...

When there's really something there, I'll be interested.

There is no story.  Two simple concepts.  Was she authorized, and did she have the intent to transfer classified documents to unauthorized people.  It was NEVER against the law to have a private server.  The logic is circular and makes no sense to anybody with average levels of intelligence.   This is not difficult concepts.  The problem is that the political witch hunt has as its central tenet.....Hillary when did you stop beating Bill.....if she answers that she never beat Bill, she will be accused of avoiding the question where the assumption of the propaganda creates the possession of a private server as being illegal.  It is not.  She was authorized.  She had NO intent to transfer classified data to unauthorized folks.  Comparing this to the General transferring physical documents to his girlfriend........sorry next made up chit please.

She was not authorized... it was an unauthorized server. That's the whole point dilbert.