Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Told you so! Printing those TRILLIONS of dollars, to keep interest rates artifically low...DID NO GOOD.

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

Told you so! Printing those TRILLIONS of dollars, to keep interest rates artifically low...DID NO GOOD.

St. Louis Fed official: No evidence QE boosted economy

Jeff Cox | @JeffCoxCNBCcom 8/18/15


The Federal Reserve is putting some of its post-crisis actions under a magnifying glass and not liking everything it sees.

In a white paper dissecting the U.S. central bank's actions to stem the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, Stephen D. Williamson, vice president of the St. Louis Fed, finds fault with three key policy tenets.

Specifically, he believes the zero interest rates in place since 2008 that were designed to spark good inflation actually have resulted in just the opposite. And he believes the "forward guidance" the Fed has used to communicate its intentions has instead been a muddle of broken vows that has served only to confuse investors. Finally, he asserts that quantitative easing, or the monthly debt purchases that swelled the central bank's balance sheet past the $4.5 trillion mark, have at best a tenuous link to actual economic improvements.

Williamson is quick to acknowledge that then-Chairman Ben Bernanke's Fed, through liquidity programs like the Term Auction Facility that injected cash into banks, "helped to assure that the Fed's Great Depression errors were not repeated."

"There is no work, to my knowledge, that establishes a link from QE to the ultimate goals of the Fed—inflation and real economic activity"
-Stephen D. Williamson, St. Louis Fed vice president

But as for spurring inflation, reducing employment or otherwise generating sustained economic activity, the results, particularly for QE, are "at best best mixed." In addition to muted inflation, gross domestic product has yet to eclipse 2.5 percent for any calendar year during the recovery, while wage gains, and consequently living standards, have been mired around 2 percent or less.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/18/st-louis-fed-official-no-evidence-qe-boosted-economy.html

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:Told you so!  Printing those TRILLIONS of dollars, to keep interest rates artifically low...DID NO GOOD.

Another thing to blame on Barrack Hussein Obama, correct?

Even though QE was actually started at the end of George W. Bush's presidency?

Why would Bush allow QE to start if it was destined to fail?

Or, could it be that the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is so powerful that not even a president can tell him or her what to do? I don't think that either President Bush nor President Obama could have halted any of the 3 QEs that were done by the Fed.

If poster Margin Call was around, he would post something on the veracity of the article semi-demented poster Markle used as a source.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:Told you so!  Printing those TRILLIONS of dollars, to keep interest rates artifically low...DID NO GOOD.

Another thing to blame on Barrack Hussein Obama, correct?

Even though QE was actually started at the end of George W. Bush's presidency?

Why would Bush allow QE to start if it was destined to fail?

Or, could it be that the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is so powerful that not even a president can tell him or her what to do? I don't think that either President Bush nor President Obama could have halted any of the 3 QEs that were done by the Fed.

If poster Margin Call was around, he would post something on the veracity of the article semi-demented poster Markle used as a source.

As for blaming semi-retired President Obama...if the shoe fits, and it does....

Perhaps you had not noticed, we are nearly SEVEN YEARS into the failed administration of semi-retired President Obama.  You're saying that President's have no influence?  Really?

boards of FL

boards of FL

Markle wrote:As for inflation, the only thing preventing runaway inflation is the Fed. continuing to pump in massive amounts of dollars.


_________________
I approve this message.

Markle

Markle

boards of FL wrote:
Markle wrote:As for inflation, the only thing preventing runaway inflation is the Fed. continuing to pump in massive amounts of dollars.

"There is no work, to my knowledge, that establishes a link from QE to the ultimate goals of the Fed—inflation and real economic activity"
-Stephen D. Williamson, St. Louis Fed vice president

But as for spurring inflation, reducing employment or otherwise generating sustained economic activity, the results, particularly for QE, are "at best mixed." In addition to muted inflation, gross domestic product has yet to eclipse 2.5 percent for any calendar year during the recovery, while wage gains, and consequently living standards, have been mired around 2 percent or less.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/18/st-louis-fed-official-no-evidence-qe-boosted-economy.html

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum