Planned Parenthood Warns Media Outlets NOT TO AIR Undercover Video of Baby Organ Harvesting

PkrBum wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Unedited video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H4UjIM9B9KQ

I don't have any problem with making some use of the body since somebody already killed them.

Hell... y'all can go ahead and start sterilizing people again for all I care.

Will you focus on the poor and minorities again?

.

PkrBum wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Unedited video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H4UjIM9B9KQ

I don't have any problem with making some use of the body since somebody already killed them.

Hell... y'all can go ahead and start sterilizing people again for all I care.

Will you focus on the poor and minorities again?

.

PkrBum wrote:That should make it clear that I think making use of the killed fetus is practical. But when y'all start throwing up lame obfuscations it means you don't want to deal with the reality. I don't think there should be a charge... but y'all can't minimize it with excuses.

Own it. Be proud of it... expand it... branch out into sterilization again. Cmon... you know you'll eventually support it.

Y'all are such lame followers it's ridiculous. The unedited version was released long ago but y'all ignored it.

PkrBum wrote:Own it. Be proud of it... expand it... branch out into sterilization again. Cmon... you know you'll eventually support it.

nadalfan wrote:

polecat wrote:?

If the fetus you save is gay will you continue to protect it's rights?

Benedictine Nun, Sister Joan Chittister's statement on being pro life

""I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."

PkrBum wrote:When do we get to start sterilizing people that have children that they can't provide for?

knothead wrote:

nadalfan wrote:

polecat wrote:?

If the fetus you save is gay will you continue to protect it's rights?

Benedictine Nun, Sister Joan Chittister's statement on being pro life

""I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."

Very profound nadalfan . . . . . seriously

PkrBum wrote:I don't think there should be a charge...

Obamasucks wrote:Planned Parenthood=African American genocidal organization equal to Nazis of WW II

PkrBum wrote:Unedited video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H4UjIM9B9KQ

I don't have any problem with making some use of the body since somebody already killed them.

Hell... y'all can go ahead and start sterilizing people again for all I care.

Will you focus on the poor and minorities again?

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:I don't think there should be a charge...

I didn't catch that part earlier.  The charge is simply to cover the costs of collecting/providing the tissue.  Is that really it?  All of this hysteria boils down to the idea that an organization be reimbursed for expenses that they incur in the process of collecting and providing tissue for scientific research - which saves lives?  

Here again, this is simply manufactured outrage about nothing.  But when your political party is completely irrelevant in the world of policy, this is what you get.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Markle will continue to be classless.

He does like to post on this forum photos of dead people, bodies falling from buildings, and now photos of fetus pieces. It goes way beyond being classless, I am afraid.....

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:I don't think there should be a charge...

I didn't catch that part earlier.  The charge is simply to cover the costs of collecting/providing the tissue.  Is that really it?  All of this hysteria boils down to the idea that an organization be reimbursed for expenses that they incur in the process of collecting and providing tissue for scientific research - which saves lives?  

Here again, this is simply manufactured outrage about nothing.  But when your political party is completely irrelevant in the world of policy, this is what you get.

Selling body parts is illegal.  

Planned Parenthood conspired on a major scale, to negotiate the highest prices they could get for killing an infant.

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:I don't think there should be a charge...

I didn't catch that part earlier.  The charge is simply to cover the costs of collecting/providing the tissue.  Is that really it?  All of this hysteria boils down to the idea that an organization be reimbursed for expenses that they incur in the process of collecting and providing tissue for scientific research - which saves lives?  

Here again, this is simply manufactured outrage about nothing.  But when your political party is completely irrelevant in the world of policy, this is what you get.

Selling body parts is illegal.  

Planned Parenthood conspired on a major scale, to negotiate the highest prices they could get for killing an infant.

They aren't selling body parts.  The video is heavily edited in an attempt to make it appear as if that is what is happening, but when you watch the entire video and get the full context, you see that they are not in fact selling body parts.

As I said before, this is just another video in the same vein as the ACORN and Sherrod videos, which were heavily edited and sold to the low information voter.  You can think of these videos as a litmus test for stupid.

Markle wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:I don't think there should be a charge...

I didn't catch that part earlier.  The charge is simply to cover the costs of collecting/providing the tissue.  Is that really it?  All of this hysteria boils down to the idea that an organization be reimbursed for expenses that they incur in the process of collecting and providing tissue for scientific research - which saves lives?  

Here again, this is simply manufactured outrage about nothing.  But when your political party is completely irrelevant in the world of policy, this is what you get.

Selling body parts is illegal.  

Planned Parenthood conspired on a major scale, to negotiate the highest prices they could get for killing an infant.

They aren't selling body parts.  The video is heavily edited in an attempt to make it appear as if that is what is happening, but when you watch the entire video and get the full context, you see that they are not in fact selling body parts.

As I said before, this is just another video in the same vein as the ACORN and Sherrod videos, which were heavily edited and sold to the low information voter.  You can think of these videos as a litmus test for stupid.

They discuss the price they can charge for body parts...one comments she wants a Lamborghini (don't blame her) an that is not selling body parts.

Apparently you are the only one who has viewed all the tapes and have arrived at the conclusion that what they said, is not really what they said.  Not unlike President Bill Clinton laboring of the definition of the word "is".

ACORN collapsed because what they were doing was illegal and they were caught.  Not to worry, your Socialist organization is alive and well under different names.