It's just nonsense to say the Officer had no cause for the stop & did not tell him the reason for the stop. Watch the video ... she tells him right at the beginning of her contact with him (at 2:18 to 2:23 on the video)
Again, is anybody reading the thread. Dreams said she stopped him because she saw the tint and ran the plates. Yet, when the citizen asked why he was stopped, the officer either lied(she said NOTHING about the tint), or she had NO probable cause and screwed up the input intentionally to make a mismatch, was negligent in the entry, or there was a plate scanner which malfunctioned. How come the supervisor found compliance and let the citizen go? There needs to be an investigation. Our rights are being trampled, and the lynch mob has completely tried to sidestep these issues and stop the discussions........naw Seaoat....we got that uppity one, and don't give a damn about the constitution or the dangerous expanding infringement on the fourth amendment....plus he back talked a white lady.
Again, is anybody reading the thread. Dreams said she stopped him because she saw the tint and ran the plates. Yet, when the citizen asked why he was stopped, the officer either lied(she said NOTHING about the tint), or she had NO probable cause and screwed up the input intentionally to make a mismatch, was negligent in the entry, or there was a plate scanner which malfunctioned. How come the supervisor found compliance and let the citizen go? There needs to be an investigation. Our rights are being trampled, and the lynch mob has completely tried to sidestep these issues and stop the discussions........naw Seaoat....we got that uppity one, and don't give a damn about the constitution or the dangerous expanding infringement on the fourth amendment....plus he back talked a white lady.