Sal wrote:
OH HORRORS! People who actually READ the constitution.
What could be worse?
Go to page : 1, 2
Sal wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:2seaoat wrote:Hillsdale is a second rate Michigan college where students would be far better served taking a constitution course at their local junior college.
Obviously you did neither.
Thank you for sharing.
Since you're praising Hillsdale, I take it they believe that it's true freedom and liberty to allow fascists to control elections through campaign funding. Right?
Markle wrote:Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:2seaoat wrote:Hillsdale is a second rate Michigan college where students would be far better served taking a constitution course at their local junior college.
Obviously you did neither.
Thank you for sharing.
Since you're praising Hillsdale, I take it they believe that it's true freedom and liberty to allow fascists to control elections through campaign funding. Right?
Since I believe with all my heart in freedom and liberty, and you do not, that would make you the Fascist. Funny how that works.
Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:2seaoat wrote:Hillsdale is a second rate Michigan college where students would be far better served taking a constitution course at their local junior college.
Obviously you did neither.
Thank you for sharing.
Since you're praising Hillsdale, I take it they believe that it's true freedom and liberty to allow fascists to control elections through campaign funding. Right?
Since I believe with all my heart in freedom and liberty, and you do not, that would make you the Fascist. Funny how that works.
that's a piss poor way to avoid the question I posed. Does Hillsdale believe it's okay to allow fascists to control elections through campaign funding -- yes or no?
2seaoat wrote:Since you do not believe in freedom and liberty,
Really....that is all you have. Slinger does not believe in freedom and liberty.....he must have an alias, because the guy posting here does believe in those concepts, and again you are grasping at straws.
Markle wrote:2seaoat wrote:Since you do not believe in freedom and liberty,
Really....that is all you have. Slinger does not believe in freedom and liberty.....he must have an alias, because the guy posting here does believe in those concepts, and again you are grasping at straws.
Wordslinger believes in Freedom and Liberty just so he and Socialist/Communist Bernie Sanders get to decide who, what and when someone is free and then it is just so long as they comply with their rules.
Wordslinger wrote:
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Benito Mussolini
Bob wrote:Wordslinger wrote:
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Benito Mussolini
Somehow I'm just not sure how wise it is to use Benito Mussolini's ideas to support a point. What's next, are we gonna start quoting Ivan the Terrible and Vlad the Impaler? lol
Well in that case let's "define the terms" a little more, shall we.Floridatexan wrote:Bob wrote:Wordslinger wrote:
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Benito Mussolini
Somehow I'm just not sure how wise it is to use Benito Mussolini's ideas to support a point. What's next, are we gonna start quoting Ivan the Terrible and Vlad the Impaler? lol
Just defining terms.
Bob wrote:Question, Markle?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
If Pace High School decides to do a morning prayer in homeroom,
how would you interpret and apply that clause in the 1st Amendment? Would you say the Constitution does or does not prohibit that school prayer? And explain why you take whichever position on this?
Bob wrote:Well in that case let's "define the terms" a little more, shall we.Floridatexan wrote:Bob wrote:Wordslinger wrote:
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Benito Mussolini
Somehow I'm just not sure how wise it is to use Benito Mussolini's ideas to support a point. What's next, are we gonna start quoting Ivan the Terrible and Vlad the Impaler? lol
Just defining terms.
Here is a more complete "definition of the terms" for you. lol
http://www.theguardian.com/education/2001/jun/25/artsandhumanities.highereducation
Floridatexan wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/apr/24/usa.comment
Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:2seaoat wrote:Since you do not believe in freedom and liberty,
Really....that is all you have. Slinger does not believe in freedom and liberty.....he must have an alias, because the guy posting here does believe in those concepts, and again you are grasping at straws.
Wordslinger believes in Freedom and Liberty just so he and Socialist/Communist Bernie Sanders get to decide who, what and when someone is free and then it is just so long as they comply with their rules.
And Bernie and I have you at the top of our list. Be afraid. Very afraid, you fascist scum.
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Benito Mussolini
Bob wrote:This is the main Webster dictionary definition of the word "fascism".
"a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition"
While it could be argued that some of that might apply to the right-wing in America, I was not aware they championed a "centralized autocratic government".
If that's the case then somebody needs to tell Ross Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, the tea party, and the rest of that ilk that they're in favor of a strong centralized American government.
And somebody needs to dig up Mussolini's corpse and tell him that too. Because that would make him an uber-fascist. ESPECIALLY the part about "forcible suppression of opposition". lol
2seaoat wrote:The constitution is a beautiful document rich with two hundred years of interpretation and application. I think people should read and understand before going near a keyboard.
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum