363 Total congressmen now against Obama's shenanigans with Iran

http://conservativetribune.com/363-congressmen-unite/

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Gee, will they write a stern letter to the Iranian Mullahs like those stupid 47 GOP senators did?

Now that Bibi has been exposed as the loud-mouthed, blow-hard liar that he is, Obama will forge ahead on Iran without interference.

Again, 363 voices in Congress represent far more people than Obama at this time in his failed admin. That's what you don't get,

Again, 363 voices in Congress represent far more people than Obama at this time in his failed admin. That's what you don't get,




Please see the British loyalist link and the use of tar and feathering for traitors.

2seaoat wrote:Again, 363 voices in Congress represent far more people than Obama at this time in his failed admin. That's what you don't get,




Please see the British loyalist link and the use of tar and feathering for traitors.

Good luck tarring and feathering the representative MAJORITY

Good luck tarring and feathering the representative MAJORITY

The majority of Americans twice voted for President Obama, but a traitor is a traitor whether they are in the majority or the minority because when anybody puts foreign interests before American kids being exposed to war and death..........their traitorous deeds are not measured by majority or minority, but by how little money it took to buy them off and sell out our children.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Gee, will they write a stern letter to the Iranian Mullahs like those stupid 47 GOP senators did?

Now that Bibi has been exposed as the loud-mouthed, blow-hard liar that he is, Obama will forge ahead on Iran without interference.

What agreement? The Iranians know they have semi-retired President Obama by the short curlies. President Obama is DESPERATE for an agreement which is a terrible way to go to a negotiating table. Of course, President Obama believes if he whispers sweet nothings in the Iranian ears, they'll just roll over and discard their nuclear bomb program.

At least for the next 24 months.

What would you suggest as the alternative to slow down nuclear weapon development in Iran? More sanctions which five years ago President Obama was criticized by Bibi and others as being ineffective in slowing down the nuclear development. Maybe precision military strikes will eliminate Iran's nuclear development? How does a military against Iran stop nuclear weapon development without boots on the ground when some of the labs are under mountains and dispersed throughout the country? Who would be the boots on the ground?

I think any agreement which does not have sound verification is not a good agreement. It should not be supported. However, a good diplomatic solution with verification should be an objective goal for our allies, Israel, and all Americans. Louis Gomer is calling for immediate military strikes, yet is this not just as naive as blind trust that the Iranians will comply without verification?

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

KarlRove wrote:http://conservativetribune.com/363-congressmen-unite/

That website didn't show much of an article on the subject. It did, however show a bunch of lame advertising.

Conservative Tribune = obscure blog from nowhere, just like many of the sites Karl frequents.  

It should surprise no one that Karl clings to the info the site offers, however.

How much more do you need on the subject and is the article true or else?

BREAKING: 363 Congressmen Unite in Full Defiance of Obama’s Treason

We’ve all heard the adage “better late than never” and there can hardly be a more appropriate situation to use it than when discussing attempts to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

As President Barack Obama appears to be reaching a deal with Iran on nuclear enrichment, more than 360 members of Congress finally decided it was time to remind him that he isn’t a dictator … yet.

In a letter introduced by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce and New York Democrat Rep. Eliot Engel, members of Congress insisted that the permanent sanctions relief Iran demands would require new legislation. New legislation that isn’t going to come so easily.

In regard to any agreement on the matter the letter said, “Congress must be convinced that its terms foreclose any pathway to a bomb, and only then will Congress be able to consider permanent sanctions relief.”

Additionally, the letter said “Iran’s role in fomenting instability in the region … demonstrates the risks of negotiating with a partner we cannot trust.”

The letter was signed by 363 members of Congress and it emphasizes the bipartisan desire to prevent the Obama administration from negotiating a bad nuclear deal with Iran, which would prove to be disastrous (H/T Newsmax).

In a Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Iran, Engal said the letter expressed Congress’ “strong feelings” about what exactly needs to be in the agreement.

“Congress really needs to play a very active and vital role in this whole process, and any attempts to sidestep Congress will be resisted on both sides of the aisle,” he added.

It’s good to see Democrats and Republicans coming together to face down Obama on this important issue and we could only hope that it happens more often.

http://conservativetribune.com/363-congressmen-unite/

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Congress-bipartisan-group-Obama-Iran-deal/2015/03/19/id/631230/

ZVUGKTUBM, please share with us what information is missing.

Or, once again, are you just whining?