New jobless claims 4-week average falls to lowest level since May 2000 - Clinton era numbers

http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=460735&cust=mam&year=2014&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top


Bush never enjoyed numbers like this throughout his entire presidency.

Fairly quiet in here. New unemployment numbers will be out next Friday. Expect this to continue.

boards of FL wrote:http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=460735&cust=mam&year=2014&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top

Bush never enjoyed numbers like this throughout his entire presidency.

Why not show all of the Bush years too? You know, just to prove your point.

The bottom line is, how many more people can drop out of even looking for a job?

The bottom line is

You were wrong.

Markle wrote:Why not show all of the Bush years too?  You know, just to prove your point.

Rather than ask me that, why don't you?

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:Why not show all of the Bush years too?  You know, just to prove your point.

Rather than ask me that, why don't you?

You posted it and can't find it on you Progressive sites can you?

Labor Participation Rate...same rate as 1977...President Jimmy Carter

Mr. Markle your dishonesty is very telling. I have explained the impact of 10k retiring babyboomers per day on the participation rate, yet you continue to take the fact that babyboomers who represent a large population bubble are retiring. You think that is a bad thing. My friends who are retiring think it is a good thing. However, to take the participation rate and turn the same into a negative. It is not.

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Markle wrote:Why not show all of the Bush years too?  You know, just to prove your point.

Rather than ask me that, why don't you?

You posted it and can't find it on you Progressive sites can you?

I gave you a link to the source of the image. Are you not familiar with how the internet works? Here, Markle.

http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=460735&cust=mam&year=2014&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top

See that weird looking text above the text that you're reading right now? Move that little mouse pointer thing so that it rests atop the weird text above and then press the left button on your mouse. Wow!!! Right? Whew knew? Now, tell me if you recognize anything at that new webpage? It kinda looks like the image that I posted above, doesn't? Wow! Amazing!

Now, if you have some point that you feel you can make by showings us a comparable chart for the Bush years, feel free to do so. Something tells me, however, you aren't equipped to accomplish such a task.


Here again, when conversing with republicans on the internet, one has to make sure that they explain everything as if they're talking to a 4 year old.

Perhaps PACEDOG wanted to bury this?