Seven witnesses day the same BOF
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seven witnesses day the same BOF
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seven witnesses day the same BOF
Joanimaroni wrote:Sal wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:
I haven't presented any theories.
You've said that Brown assaulted Wilson.
That's a theory that is contradicted by some witnesses.
Others say Brown was simply trying to escape.
FT's theory is more believable than the bullshit story Wilson has spun.
No theory.
Brown committed a strong armed robbery.
Brown had Marijuana in his system.
The officer, according to reports not theory, was assaulted by Brown while in his car.
Brown grabbed for the officer's gun, according to reports. The gun fired twice.
Assaulting an officer is a felony.
Some witnesses stated Brown was shot in the back.
Some witnesses said Brown's hands were up.
Some witnesses say they were not up.
Brown was shot and killed.
Some say he was charging the officer.
Some say he was not.
Joanimaroni wrote:Sal wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:
I haven't presented any theories.
You've said that Brown assaulted Wilson.
That's a theory that is contradicted by some witnesses.
Others say Brown was simply trying to escape.
FT's theory is more believable than the bullshit story Wilson has spun.
No theory.
Brown committed a strong armed robbery.
Brown had Marijuana in his system.
The officer, according to reports not theory, was assaulted by Brown while in his car.
Brown grabbed for the officer's gun, according to reports. The gun fired twice.
Assaulting an officer is a felony.
Some witnesses stated Brown was shot in the back.
Some witnesses said Brown's hands were up.
Some witnesses say they were not up.
Brown was shot and killed.
Some say he was charging the officer.
Some say he was not.
Markle wrote:
Both autopsies have shown that he was NOT shot in the back.
Floridatexan wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Sal wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:
I haven't presented any theories.
You've said that Brown assaulted Wilson.
That's a theory that is contradicted by some witnesses.
Others say Brown was simply trying to escape.
FT's theory is more believable than the bullshit story Wilson has spun.
No theory.
Brown committed a strong armed robbery.
Brown had Marijuana in his system.
The officer, according to reports not theory, was assaulted by Brown while in his car.
Brown grabbed for the officer's gun, according to reports. The gun fired twice.
Assaulting an officer is a felony.
Some witnesses stated Brown was shot in the back.
Some witnesses said Brown's hands were up.
Some witnesses say they were not up.
Brown was shot and killed.
Some say he was charging the officer.
Some say he was not.
You're full of it, sister. And there you go again, providing "facts" with no substantiation.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/23/1338661/-The-Official-Michael-Brown-Autopsy-Report-Doesn-t-Say-What-the-St-Louis-Post-Dispatch-Says-It-Does?detail=email
Sal wrote:Markle wrote:
Both autopsies have shown that he was NOT shot in the back.
You're clueless.
2seaoat wrote:Mr. Markle......how many people in your life have you been around who are stoned on pot? How many people in your lifetime have you seen who were stoned who were brawling?
I listened to the lady who did the autopsy talk about the drug screens, and there is zero doubt that Michael was high on THC. So exactly why would a race baiter be concerned that Michael was high?
2seaoat wrote:However, no definitive correlation between marijuana use and violence in adults has been establish;
Can you say the same thing for Alcohol? However, I argue that a person wearing any nike footwear has a higher correlation with violence than a person using pot.
Therefore, did the autopsy report what type of shoe Michael was wearing, and whether the shoe was properly fit?
Headline racebaiters cringe that Michael was wearing Nike gym shoes.
Last edited by Joanimaroni on 10/24/2014, 7:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
2seaoat wrote:Brown had aggressive tendacies with the store clerk during the strong armed robbery.
Describe those.......
2seaoat wrote:Michael Brown was an adult who was recognized as an adult. He was 18. Please read the definition of adolescent. He certainly still may have been a kid, but under those studies to call a person an adolescent it requires that they not be of legal age. Again, there is zero correlation with pot smoking and adult violence. The real world stats coming out of Colorado are stunning.
So again....please connect the dots.
Floridatexan wrote:
I believe I read an initial report that said a shot from behind may have grazed the "suspect". That may have been the reason he decided to give himself up...just before his death.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|