Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Senate Candidate Orchestrated Racial Gerrymander, Now Praises Court For Striking It Down

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

boards of FL

boards of FL

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2014/10/14/3579320/ed-gillespie-gerrymander/


Amazing what you can do and say when your base is essentially comatose.


In a debate with Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) Monday, Senate candidate Ed Gillespie (R-VA) praised a recent court decision for tossing out Virginia’s racially gerrymandered congressional maps — even though the maps were the direct result of a partisan redistricting scheme he himself crafted.

Asked if he would support a bill to restore Voting Rights Act protections gutted by the U.S. Supreme Court last year, Gillespie argued that more protections are unnecessary because the courts are still able to strike down discriminatory laws like Virginia’s.

“We saw here just recently in Virginia that civil rights and the Voting Rights Act is being enforced. We have had our district lines overturned by the courts and it is one of the reasons why the federal court is so important,” Gillespie said, abruptly pivoting to attack Warner on a nepotism scandal.

The problem is, Gillespie was a key architect in Republicans’ gerrymandering effort that led to the Virginia maps in the first place.
Shortly after Gillespie became the chair of the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) in 2010, the group launched a major push to redistrict state legislative maps to favor Republicans, called the Redistricting Majority Project, or REDMAP. The RSLC raised more than $30 million to pack state legislatures with Republicans who would approve maps to lock in Republican seats for the next decade.

The now invalidated Virginia maps, which were approved after Republicans took control of the state Senate, are considered one of the most aggressive racial gerrymanders in the nation. The maps consolidated several disparate African American communities into one awkwardly shaped district, effectively siloing black voters so they would not impact other districts. The legislature must now redraw more equitably distributed maps by April.

Despite the setback in Virginia, Gillespie’s national Republican gerrymander has achieved its goal, costing Democrats 1.7 million votes in seven states in the 2012 election.


_________________
I approve this message.

Sal

Sal

boards of FL wrote:
Amazing what you can do and say when your base is essentially comatose.

It's crazy.

Last night Mitch McConnell said Obamacare should be repealed "root and branch", but Kentucky can keep it's exchange website Kynect and nothing would change for the 500,000 people who've obtained health insurance through it.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
Amazing what you can do and say when your base is essentially comatose.

It's crazy.

Last night Mitch McConnell said Obamacare should be repealed "root and branch", but Kentucky can keep it's exchange website Kynect and nothing would change for the 500,000 people who've obtained health insurance through it.

Ya... that's worse than saying it wouldn't cost one thin dime more or that if you liked your plan and dr you could keep em.

But that was probably just to get elected... so it doesn't really count for democrats.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


So I looked at the results of the court decision on Florida gerrymandering. Surprise...not much difference between the "old" maps and the "new" maps, and changes not applicable in the current election.



http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/08/23/3475056/republicans-score-big-victory-in-their-battle-to-keep-florida-gerrymandered/

Guest


Guest

I guess we can all use whichever bs propaganda site we can find this side of the moon. Or is it just you leftists?

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:
Sal wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
Amazing what you can do and say when your base is essentially comatose.

It's crazy.

Last night Mitch McConnell said Obamacare should be repealed "root and branch", but Kentucky can keep it's exchange website Kynect and nothing would change for the 500,000 people who've obtained health insurance through it.

Ya... that's worse than saying it wouldn't cost one thin dime more or that if you liked your plan and dr you could keep em.

But that was probably just to get elected... so it doesn't really count for democrats.

See, the thing is Mitch has to say Kentuckians can keep Kynect because it's extremely popular, and say he's going to repeal Obamacare "root and branch" because Kentuckians are largely racist and ignorant.

It's the same with his opponent refusing to admit she voted for Obama because Kentuckians are largely racist and ignorant.

So, yeah ...

... worse.

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:I guess we can all use whichever bs propaganda site we can find this side of the moon.  Or is it just you leftists?

Seriously?

You actually have the gall to write that after posting these links earlier today ...


http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftrace.html

http://m.nationalreview.com/articles/345274/progressive-racism-paul-rahe

Unreal.

Guest


Guest

I didn't start it asshole. I've always tried to find reliable mainstream sources. But there can only be one set of rules.

Let's have a fair game... play ball.

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:I guess we can all use whichever bs propaganda site we can find this side of the moon.  Or is it just you leftists?


Are you honestly going to play a strategy of ignorance here?  You're seriously not aware of republican district gerrymandering?

You're either an incredibly dense fucking idiot, or you're an asshole completely lacking in character.  I'll leave that to the reader to decide, but in order to deal with your bullshit, here is a link to a report from the Republican State Leadership Committee in which they boast about their redistricting strategy and overtly state that it was very much responsible for their recent success in the House.  


http://www.rslc.gop/redmap_2012_summary_report

A few key points...

2010 State Elections: REDMAP’s Execution

As the 2010 Census approached, the RSLC began planning for the subsequent election cycle, formulating a strategy to keep or win Republican control of state legislatures with the largest impact on congressional redistricting as a result of reapportionment. That effort, the REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP), focused critical resources on legislative chambers in states projected to gain or lose congressional seats in 2011 based on Census data.

The rationale was straightforward:  Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn.  Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.


2012 Congressional Elections: REDMAP’s Impact

President Obama won reelection in 2012 by nearly 3 points nationally, and banked 126 more electoral votes than Governor Mitt Romney.  Democratic candidates for the U.S. House won 1.1 million more votes than their Republican opponents.  But the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives is a Republican and presides over a 33-seat House Republican majority during the 113th Congress.  How?  One needs to look no farther than four states that voted Democratic on a statewide level in 2012, yet elected a strong Republican delegation to represent them in Congress: Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.


How's that for a source?  I almost feel the need to increase the text size for that last one, just in case it doesn't sink in for you.  Here, PkrBum.  Look at the oversized text and see if you can wrap that incredibly dense head around what is being said there.

2012 Congressional Elections: REDMAP’s Impact

President Obama won reelection in 2012 by nearly 3 points nationally, and banked 126 more electoral votes than Governor Mitt Romney.  Democratic candidates for the U.S. House won 1.1 million more votes than their Republican opponents.  But the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives is a Republican and presides over a 33-seat House Republican majority during the 113th Congress.  How?  One needs to look no farther than four states that voted Democratic on a statewide level in 2012, yet elected a strong Republican delegation to represent them in Congress: Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Dumbing that down for you, PkrBum:  Right wing cheat in vote thing.  Right wing draw new line on ground so that the way vote count is not same as was before.  Right wing draw new line on ground so that they need less vote to win.  Right wing count on fact that those who vote for right wing are dumb.  Right wing know that it cannot win if it has to make ideas to pass as law.  Right wing give up on that and now just try to draw new line on ground.  It work because those who vote for right wing are dumb.


Here are a few more links, though I suspect they are far beyond your reading level.  Actually, they definitely are.


http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/10/gerrymandering

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/gop-gerrymandering-creates-uphill-fight-dems-house/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/05/15/americas-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts/

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/gop-could-pay-price-for-gerrymandering-93597.html

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-republicans-rig-the-game-20131111

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/opinion/sunday/the-great-gerrymander-of-2012.html?pagewanted=all


_________________
I approve this message.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:I guess we can all use whichever bs propaganda site we can find this side of the moon.  Or is it just you leftists?

Are you denying that Florida legislators were found guilty of gerrymandering? Or that the GOP is desperately trying to change the outcome in November by all means of illegal and unconstitutional trickery? I can't think of a single Republican I respect...not a single one.

Guest


Guest

Just another case of the democrats initiating a strategy and then crying foul when the other side does it.

I wonder how y'all will like the new senate rules if you lose the election? Not too much... would be my prediction.

boards of FL

boards of FL

And this is a perfect example of the difference between idiots and otherwise well adjusted people.

When faced with facts and reality, well adjusted people learn and adapt. Idiots double down on stupid.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:And this is a perfect example of the difference between idiots and otherwise well adjusted people.

When faced with facts and reality, well adjusted people learn and adapt. Idiots double down on stupid.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum