Angry Cadanian

PACEDOG#1 wrote:by Th Dude Yesterday at 6:41 pm
As long as they target innocents... I don't give a flying fuck what tactics are used against them.

Drones with fricking laser beams attached to their heads seem the most cost effective means to me.

Plus... they fear them.
-------
The "laser" you refer to is for munition guidance only.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Th Dude wrote:And it's complicit right though to the media. When was the last time a body count and flag draped coffins made the front page or the broadcast news? They don't even cover civilian deaths in yemen or pakistan or anyplace else obama's bombing.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Innocent people are NEVER targeted. Innocent people are hit because the bad guys surround themselves with civilians just so people like you will whine and cry over collateral damage.

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

I never read that thread and I certainly didn't post an article about Obama's hit list. You did. If that's not comparing killing innocent people then I don't know what is. I merely made a point we are not guiltless in our war engagements also ...so if that's condescending I'm your man. However, you're the last person who should be calling out someone for not knowing what they're talking about. You repeatedly post bullshit like black and whites ratios on welfare or illegals getting benefits w/o any regard for the truth. As long as it's something bad about Obama, it must be true. Right? Well, keep on looking for that "condescending bullshit". It beat your "bullshit".

Chrissy* wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

I never read that thread and I certainly didn't post an article about Obama's hit list. You did. If that's not comparing killing innocent people then I don't know what is. I merely made a point we are not guiltless in our war engagements also ...so if that's condescending I'm your man. However, you're the last person who should be calling out someone for not knowing what they're talking about. You repeatedly post bullshit like black and whites ratios on welfare or illegals getting benefits w/o any regard for the truth. As long as it's something bad about Obama, it must be true. Right? Well, keep on looking for that "condescending bullshit". It beat your "bullshit".

You haven't beaten anything. Except maybe a record for not being able to use common sense and logic.

knothead wrote:

Chrissy* wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

I never read that thread and I certainly didn't post an article about Obama's hit list. You did. If that's not comparing killing innocent people then I don't know what is. I merely made a point we are not guiltless in our war engagements also ...so if that's condescending I'm your man. However, you're the last person who should be calling out someone for not knowing what they're talking about. You repeatedly post bullshit like black and whites ratios on welfare or illegals getting benefits w/o any regard for the truth. As long as it's something bad about Obama, it must be true. Right? Well, keep on looking for that "condescending bullshit". It beat your "bullshit".

You haven't beaten anything. Except maybe a record for not being able to use common sense and logic.

Coming from you that is just so odd . . . .  

Chrissy* wrote:

knothead wrote:

Chrissy* wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

I never read that thread and I certainly didn't post an article about Obama's hit list. You did. If that's not comparing killing innocent people then I don't know what is. I merely made a point we are not guiltless in our war engagements also ...so if that's condescending I'm your man. However, you're the last person who should be calling out someone for not knowing what they're talking about. You repeatedly post bullshit like black and whites ratios on welfare or illegals getting benefits w/o any regard for the truth. As long as it's something bad about Obama, it must be true. Right? Well, keep on looking for that "condescending bullshit". It beats your "bullshit".

You haven't beaten anything. Except maybe a record for not being able to use common sense and logic.

Coming from you that is just so odd . . . .  

right

I know...right? Crackheads make more sense.

Did you put on your cute little cheer leading tutu when you made that reply?

Vikingwoman wrote:

Chrissy* wrote:

knothead wrote:

Chrissy* wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Joani is privvy to Obama's assassination list. Ain't that something? Who would have thunk? LOL!

I think I come here because it's such a side show and I can't stop laughing!

I'll refresh your memory Viking...........we were not talking about soldiers going out and killing innocent civilians. But you knew that.

I posted......and gave you a reference to enlighten yourself. Remember now?




 I'm beginning to think you really don't have a clue.

The U.S. has and has always had assasination lists to advance our position and goals.  Look up Disposition Matrix.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo

My comment was based on the woman's letter stating all the reasons she didn't care what we did to terrorists.Fair enough, however, urinating on them and killing innocent civilians of which we did doesn't justify us in acting that way.She just didn't happen to mention what we have done in retaliation which was my point and not to mention unnecessary. I agree w/ her up until a point. We need to care when we start targeting innocent people.You bringing up Obama's assassination list which included an American terrorist Awlaki and compare it to killing a host of innocent people? I don't get that kind of thinking.

Obama's list was mentioned on another thread "Founder of Blackwater" and you brought it up here. Your comments were nothing more than condescending BS. Furthermore, I never compared anything.....you did. You were trying to argue a point and you didn't have a clue what you were talking about.

I never read that thread and I certainly didn't post an article about Obama's hit list. You did. If that's not comparing killing innocent people then I don't know what is. I merely made a point we are not guiltless in our war engagements also ...so if that's condescending I'm your man. However, you're the last person who should be calling out someone for not knowing what they're talking about. You repeatedly post bullshit like black and whites ratios on welfare or illegals getting benefits w/o any regard for the truth. As long as it's something bad about Obama, it must be true. Right? Well, keep on looking for that "condescending bullshit". It beats your "bullshit".

You haven't beaten anything. Except maybe a record for not being able to use common sense and logic.

Coming from you that is just so odd . . . .  

right

I know...right? Crackheads make more sense.

Did you put on your cute little cheer leading tutu when you made that reply?

Floridatexan wrote:
Would the owner of this thread please fix the thread title.  It is annoying...as is the content.  And please, people, break out of the quote thing...that is also annoying.  

Floridatexan wrote:
Would the owner of this thread please fix the thread title.  It is annoying...as is the content.  And please, people, break out of the quote thing...that is also annoying.  

Floridatexan wrote:
Would the owner of this thread please fix the thread title.  It is annoying...as is the content.  And please, people, break out of the quote thing...that is also annoying.