Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton State Department Official Reveals Details of Alleged Document Review

More and more about the Benghazi cover up is slowly leaking out.

Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton State Department Official Reveals Details of Alleged Document Review

As the House Select Committee on Benghazi prepares for its first hearing this week, a former State Department diplomat is coming forward with a startling allegation: Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.

UPDATE: Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff allegedly present at after-hours document review.

See more: http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/

Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

knothead wrote:Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

Agreed... I think it has been demonstrated overwhelmingly over the last six years that there is literally nothing that matters.

Nothing that would create dissent or outrage among the left at their leadership. Not using tax dollars to save and enrich banks and corps. Not arming foreign criminal cartels and terrorists. Not passing legislation that allows the targeted assassination of a citizen with no due process. Not gathering information on citizens in direct contradiction of our constitutional protections. Not the surge in iraq... Not the good war in astan... Not now embarking on at best a sketchy strategy to bomb a ghost state. Oh well... I think it's clear...

Nothing matters... Yea team..!!

Th Dude wrote:

knothead wrote:Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

Agreed... I think it has been demonstrated overwhelmingly over the last six years that there is literally nothing that matters.

Nothing that would create dissent or outrage among the left at their leadership. Not using tax dollars to save and enrich banks and corps. Not arming foreign criminal cartels and terrorists. Not passing legislation that allows the targeted assassination of a citizen with no due process. Not gathering information on citizens in direct contradiction of our constitutional protections. Not the surge in iraq... Not the good war in astan... Not now embarking on at best a sketchy strategy to bomb a ghost state. Oh well... I think it's clear...

Nothing matters... Yea team..!!

Markle wrote:More and more about the Benghazi cover up is slowly leaking out.

Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton State Department Official Reveals Details of Alleged Document Review

As the House Select Committee on Benghazi prepares for its first hearing this week, a former State Department diplomat is coming forward with a startling allegation: Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.

UPDATE: Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff allegedly present at after-hours document review.

See more:  http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/

She needs to burn..... whatever it takes. She has been a liar and a conspirator from the Watergate days. If there was a female Hitler capable of the Night of Long Knives and Kristalnacht combined, it would be her.

Sharyl Attkison is a lying right-wing, posturing sack of manure.

Floridatexan wrote:
Sharyl Attkison is a lying right-wing, posturing sack of manure.

You hate when the light shines on the misdeeds of your masters.

Floridatexan wrote:
Sharyl Attkison is a lying right-wing, posturing sack of manure.

You are SO easy.

Document review......do you suppose with an active cia presence that maybe somebody is going to review documents for security reasons. Anybody been part of the folks who answer discovery in a lawsuit.......do you understand what document review is? You cannot handicap stupidity.

2seaoat wrote:Document review......do you suppose with an active cia presence that maybe somebody is going to review documents for security reasons.   Anybody been part of the folks who answer discovery in a lawsuit....... do you understand what document review is?     You cannot handicap stupidity.

Yes I do.  The purpose was to remove anything and everything which might be embarrassing or destructive to the Secretary of State or the Administration.

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Document review......do you suppose with an active cia presence that maybe somebody is going to review documents for security reasons.   Anybody been part of the folks who answer discovery in a lawsuit....... do you understand what document review is?     You cannot handicap stupidity.

Yes I do.  The purpose was to remove anything and everything which might be embarrassing or destructive to the Secretary of State or the Administration.

Not to mention that NOTHING was done to secure the mission after the attack... it was left wide open with documents strewn around. Reporters looked through that scene before the cia or fbi did. Still we don't have forensics of the weapons used.

Anyone wanna bet that they weren't american arms supplied to rebels during the overthrow of gaddafi?

Th Dude wrote:

knothead wrote:Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

Agreed... I think it has been demonstrated overwhelmingly over the last six years that there is literally nothing that matters.

Nothing that would create dissent or outrage among the left at their leadership. Not using tax dollars to save and enrich banks and corps. Not arming foreign criminal cartels and terrorists. Not passing legislation that allows the targeted assassination of a citizen with no due process. Not gathering information on citizens in direct contradiction of our constitutional protections. Not the surge in iraq... Not the good war in astan... Not now embarking on at best a sketchy strategy to bomb a ghost state. Oh well... I think it's clear...

Nothing matters... Yea team..!!

You are attributing things to Obama that happened before he took office...some of them LONG before he took office.

Floridatexan wrote:

Th Dude wrote:

knothead wrote:Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

Agreed... I think it has been demonstrated overwhelmingly over the last six years that there is literally nothing that matters.

Nothing that would create dissent or outrage among the left at their leadership. Not using tax dollars to save and enrich banks and corps. Not arming foreign criminal cartels and terrorists. Not passing legislation that allows the targeted assassination of a citizen with no due process. Not gathering information on citizens in direct contradiction of our constitutional protections. Not the surge in iraq... Not the good war in astan... Not now embarking on at best a sketchy strategy to bomb a ghost state. Oh well... I think it's clear...

Nothing matters... Yea team..!!

You are attributing things to Obama that happened before he took office...some of them LONG before he took office.  

FT, like anything like that actually matters . . . . it is Obama's fault!

Well... it would be difficult to blame libya on bush. But I've been impressed for six years at the gyrations to absolve obama.

Yes I do. The purpose was to remove anything and everything which might be embarrassing or destructive to the Secretary of State or the Administration.

Please produce an affidavit from the folks doing the document review in regard to your made up allegation. If not affidavit, a statement from her chief of staff that what you said was what she was doing. Otherwise quit exposing how little you know about government and corporate practices.

It's worrisome enough that deception can be openly practiced... yet ignored. But you admit the cia involvement.

The brits and the fucking red cross had the common sense to evacuate... but we sent our man into a shit hole.

Great fucking strategy lazy boi quarterback. You should be liable under leftist standards of sedition by association.

Stalin knew how to handle idiots that were wrong... amiright?

There... that ought to counter boards wanting to yank obamacaid from the poor republican inbreds.

SPECIETS..!!

2seaoat wrote:Yes I do.  The purpose was to remove anything and everything which might be embarrassing or destructive to the Secretary of State or the Administration.

Please produce an affidavit from the folks doing the document review in regard to your made up allegation.   If not affidavit, a statement from her chief of staff that what you said was what she was doing.   Otherwise quit exposing how little you know about government and corporate practices.

Patience my good friend. This massive cover up is beginning to unravel as are the others.

Patience my good friend. This massive cover up is beginning to unravel as are the others.


If you were talking about waiting for the Easter Bunny, it would have more credibility......you have been arguing for almost two years about the unravel.....the folks voted the President into office, and he will be collecting his pension in old age and the easter bunny nor the massive cover up will materialize.

Wow that's a dumb answer... but it only could've been worse addressing my post.

Wow that's a dumb answer... but it only could've been worse addressing my post.


CIA.....not micro managed from DC, but managed by Chris......I know you are a fan of Butchmeup and think that drones and covert activity have no place in a man's world.....but boots on the ground are the only real answer for manly men.......but we won Libya by the brave actions of Chris and his CIA cohorts working with tribal groups, and in the end this was a CIA call, and this dead horse can be beat and beat, but the massive cover up does not exist other than discretion when dealing with CIA, but it is good that Mr. Markle believes in the Easter Bunny.

If they were running weaponry and material aid into and through that region onto syria and parts unknown... that is high level shit. That does not go on without the highest levels of govt pulling the strings. Your apology tour is in a ditch.

You don't apparently know the positions of hillary or our un ambassador... they are progressive interventionists.

As were most of the presidents that inserted us into the major conflicts. Results matter... what they say they are don't.

1990.....sir I predict we will take Mr. K out, create absolute chaos in Syria and Iraq, and have Iran micro managing the collapse of Syria and Iraq........That Ukraine would throw out the Russian puppet and seek Nato admittance........quit taking drugs Seaoat......that is perfect foreign policy and there is no fricking way we could achieve that......that has about as much chance of happening as a black man being elected President. yesssireee

2seaoat wrote:1990.....sir I predict we will take Mr. K out, create absolute chaos in Syria and Iraq, and have Iran micro managing the collapse of Syria and Iraq........That Ukraine would throw out the Russian puppet and seek Nato admittance........quit taking drugs Seaoat......that is perfect foreign policy and there is no fricking way we could achieve that......that has about as much chance of happening as a black man being elected President. yesssireee

Wow that's dumb... Who are our weaponry going to?

Are you interested at all what we are supporting? Or who supports us?

Btw... When you play dumb... you're only entertaining yourself... and a very few select idiots.

Floridatexan wrote:

Th Dude wrote:

knothead wrote:Good luck trying to damage HRC . . . . . you're gonna need it!

Agreed... I think it has been demonstrated overwhelmingly over the last six years that there is literally nothing that matters.

Nothing that would create dissent or outrage among the left at their leadership. Not using tax dollars to save and enrich banks and corps. Not arming foreign criminal cartels and terrorists. Not passing legislation that allows the targeted assassination of a citizen with no due process. Not gathering information on citizens in direct contradiction of our constitutional protections. Not the surge in iraq... Not the good war in astan... Not now embarking on at best a sketchy strategy to bomb a ghost state. Oh well... I think it's clear...

Nothing matters... Yea team..!!

You are attributing things to Obama that happened before he took office...some of them LONG before he took office.  

It's not my fault!!!!! It all happened because of those other guys who were here before me! I had to bomb that sovereign nation without Congressional approval because no one else would and then leave my embassy in that same nation open to attack a year later and let the drug cartels have weapons and let those poor guys with batons at the voting stations off because none of those other guys would.

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pf8huWeoSo