Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

38% approval rating for Obama

+3
2seaoat
dumpcare
Markle
7 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

2638% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 Empty Re: 38% approval rating for Obama 9/5/2014, 11:50 pm

2seaoat



From your sensitiveness, it has become obvious you too are a supporter of Communism and the fervent desire for shared misery.




I read. I know that is an alien concept in this day and age when you can cut and paste and pretend comprehension. Communism is simply stupid. I do not support stupid. However, if you think by calling someone a communist, or sympathizer it carries a negative connotation.........that is like calling somebody a bigfoot.......Some people think they exist......that they are big, smelly, and hairy, but nobody seems to be able to find one.......so when you go around and claim everybody is a bigfoot........well it kind of makes me smile.

2738% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 Empty Re: 38% approval rating for Obama 9/5/2014, 11:51 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

PACEDOG#1 wrote:The apologizers and sympathizers for the COWH are out in force today

The nitwits who make statements like those above are very prevalent on the forum today also. Razz Razz Razz

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

2838% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 Empty Re: 38% approval rating for Obama 9/6/2014, 12:25 pm

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Markle wrote: it has become obvious you too are a supporter of Communism and the fervent desire for shared misery.

My head is spinning.  seaoat is BOTH a communist AND a "lifelong republican"?

Wouldn't that be like being BOTH the duck commander AND the leader of a gay pride parade all at the same time?

2938% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 Empty Re: 38% approval rating for Obama 9/6/2014, 12:53 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Bob wrote:
Markle wrote: it has become obvious you too are a supporter of Communism and the fervent desire for shared misery.

My head is spinning.  seaoat is BOTH a communist AND a "lifelong republican"?

Wouldn't that be like being BOTH the duck commander AND the leader of a gay pride parade all at the same time?

He keeps a list of wingnut talking points like he keeps a folder of wngnut cut-and-pastes....

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

3038% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 Empty Re: 38% approval rating for Obama 9/6/2014, 12:55 pm

2seaoat



A greedy capitalist being called a communist.....classic Markle.

Guest


Guest

Obama is a communist

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Obama is a communist

He may as well be the Antichrist to you......  I bet he sacrifices young Christian children in the Whitehouse basement. Wink

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

I bet you are all in favor of that huh?

2seaoat



Obama is a communist


I guess if just saying it makes it so, but I think he is more middle of the road Republican than he is communist.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

First seaoat is either a republican or a communist. And now obama is either a republican or a communist.
I have to wonder if all these folk are bipolar.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:A greedy capitalist being called a communist.....classic Markle.

When did you state that you were a "greedy capitalist"?

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:You expect them to call themselves Communists? Bernie Sanders is the bravest of the bunch, identifying himself as a Socialist.

I understand that many do not have education, nor have they done the requisite reading to understand political nomenclature, but Bernie Sanders is not a communist, and Luis Guttirez is about as far from being a communist as a politician can get.  You cannot have any credibility if you misuse concepts which have very specific definitions.

As to Van Jones, it is obvious nobody has studied Marxist dialectic and the progression of socialism to communism.  Van Jones association with a marxist organization does not make him a communist.  His declaring that he is a communist after the 1992 Rodney King episode did not have any of the tenets of a communist, any more than Putin declaring he is a believer in democratic government, his actions defined his political philosophy.  He was nothing more than another socialist.....if he was a communist he would have to believe in the overthrow of the Constitution and all those democratic principles which follow.  There is no viable communist party in America.  There are many offshoot Marxist and socialist organizations, but please understand the dialectic before commenting on things you do not understand.  

As you know, Van Jones declared himself a Communist.

As for their being no viable communist party in America.  Your good friend Wordslinger would vehemently disagree with you.

"A better and peaceful world is possible — a world where people and nature come before profits. That’s socialism. That’s our vision. We are the Communist Party USA."

http://cpusa.org/

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Obama is a communist


I guess if just saying it makes it so, but I think he is more middle of the road Republican than he is communist.

Oh this is getting old. This was all exposed, and buried by the main stream media eight years ago.

Who was Barack Obama's mentor from the time he was a child to when he left Hawaii for college?

Markle

Markle

Bob wrote:First seaoat is either a republican or a communist.  And now obama is either a republican or a communist.
I have to wonder if all these folk are bipolar.

38% approval rating for Obama - Page 2 ObamaMarxistProfessors

Sal

Sal

Markle wrote:
2seaoat wrote:Obama is a communist


I guess if just saying it makes it so, but I think he is more middle of the road Republican than he is communist.

Oh this is getting old. 


You've got that much right. 


What a pathetic propagandist you are, just like your mentor - Jerome Corsi. 

2seaoat



If this is all your handlers have Mr. Markle......damn the midterms will not be a fluke. You cannot handicap stupidity, and you cannot make a corporate democrat middle of the road politician into a communist when you do not even understand the term. Jones is a communist like Hannity is a Nazi......they may have tendencies, but neither are even close to the real deal.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

2seaoat wrote:As you know, Socialism is the intermediate step to Communism.




You are correct, but the key concept you must understand is that the trip from socialism to communism is a long way from most socialist organizations which have NO desire to see an autocratic and non democratic van guard speaking for all.  Communism was always a failed concept.  I have always thought of it as a rail road station which simply had the tressle to that station burn down.  The failures of the Soviet, and Chinese experiments are obvious.  The theory is fatally flawed and not a threat to any nation in this world today.  Depotism and autocratic rule which are now connected to the last crumbs of a chit sandwich called communism are more about traditional dictatorships than Marxist dialectic.  We have no communist......the bridge is down and nobody is going to that station.

Other than the North Koreans, Red China and the old USSR, the best example of communism is the old Israeli kibbutzim.

Guest


Guest

Why do you suppose those examples you just gave suck so bad as a place to live?

It takes collectivist/statist think to the Nth degree. As a system/society they should run like a watch... right?

Sal

Sal

There are no communists here, dude. 


They're all in between your ears. 

Guest


Guest

Lol... calling yourself a progressive should be just as denigrating.

Most of you have no idea as to the history and core tenants... though they are easily known.

But it sounds cool... forward comrade.

Sal

Sal

I understand that you believe glibertarians get to define the terms, but the truth is you don't get to define anything ....


.... other than irrelevance. 

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:I understand that you believe glibertarians get to define the terms, but the truth is you don't get to define anything ....


.... other than irrelevance. 

I understand that you want to be part of a relevant social movement... but it's one that has a history and direction...

Irrelevant of you and the benign qualities you loosely attach to it for your digestion. Thank you for your cooperation.

Sal

Sal

Th Dude wrote:
I understand that you want to be part of a relevant social movement... but it's one that has a history and direction...

Well, glibertarians certainly don't have to worry about having a relevant history nor direction, that's fershur!!

lmao

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:There are no communists here, dude.


They're all in between your ears. 

You mean aside from the Progressive Caucus in Washington who prefer to travel under the radar?

You forgot that I even helped you with their website so you can sign up.

As for their being no viable communist party in America. Your good friend Wordslinger would vehemently disagree with you.

"A better and peaceful world is possible — a world where people and nature come before profits. That’s socialism. That’s our vision. We are the Communist Party USA."

http://cpusa.org/

2seaoat



Other than the North Koreans, Red China and the old USSR, the best example of communism is the old Israeli kibbutzim.



You are completely wrong on your concepts. The Kibbutz had marxist influence, but it was an odd combination of socialism, capitalism, self defense, and utopian principles of small communities which required everybody to work as an ethical standard, with no strong links to traditional religion, nor strong ties to the state. There were few government ties, and initially they were established under Turkish and British rule and NEVER were communist. Political concepts have very precise meanings, and comparing a Kibbutz to Red China or the Soviet Union is a huge misapplication of the concept. Many Marxist left because they were unhappy with the meld of concepts which could be as different from one small Kibbutz to a large one where members had direct input and sexual equality to more traditional religious traditions.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum