Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.

You are not connected. Please login or register

Weird story involving Florida GOP controlled legislature and the gerrymandering of districts

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

boards of FL

boards of FL

When you cannot compete in the realm of ideas...

TALLAHASSEE -- The trial over Florida’s redrawn congressional districts took a dramatic turn Thursday when the judge closed the courtroom to the public and a private citizen — whom legislators had commended for having drawn portions of the final congressional map — testified he did not draw any maps and that his name was used without his permission.

Leon County Circuit Judge Terry Lewis closed the proceedings to allow the court to hear testimony about redistricting documents considered confidential by the firm that created them, owned by Gainesville-based political operative Pat Bainter.

Bainter lost a yearlong legal battle this week when the Florida Supreme Court ruled that 538 pages of emails, maps and planning documents Bainter considered “trade secrets” could be admitted into evidence at the trial. But the court also said that when the documents are admitted, the courtroom would be closed to the public and the news media.

The plaintiffs, a coalition of voters led by the League of Women Voters and seven Democratic-leaning individuals, accuse legislators of allowing political operatives to conduct a “shadow” redistricting process to benefit Republican incumbents and candidates in violation of the Fair District amendments to the Florida Constitution.

Lawyers for the GOP-controlled Legislature deny those claims and asked the judge Thursday to dismiss the case, arguing the challengers cannot prove that the actions of the political consultants resulted in lawmakers violating the Fair District amendments.

At least some of Bainter’s “secret” documents were admitted into evidence Thursday, opening the door for the long-sought testimony of mystery mapmaker Alex Posada.

Posada, a former Florida State University student, allegedly submitted a complete congressional map at 4:42 a.m. on Nov. 1, 2012, as part of a legislative effort to encourage public input.

A state Republican Party official, Frank Terraferma, testified last week that portions of Posada’s map were “identical” to a map he had created several months before, and that three of the districts in both maps were used in the final congressional map adopted by lawmakers.

During the trial, neither Terraferma nor any of the House and Senate redistricting staff could explain how the two maps came to look identical.

Plaintiffs’ attorney David King told the court that in a last-minute deposition taken Thursday morning, Posada testified he never drew the map, never submitted it, and the Gmail account in his name that was used to submit the maps was not his.

“It was filed without his authorization under his name,” King told the Herald/Times after the hearing. “He gave nobody authorization to file it under his name and the email account [used] to submit it was not his email account.”

Posada, a former member of the Florida State University College Republicans, had appeared at a June 2012 public hearing in Tallahassee to commend the Legislature's open process before the first maps were drawn. He signed a speaker’s card with his name and telephone number at the time.

When the Senate debated its congressional map on Jan. 17, 2013, Posada’s map was praised as an example of public participation in the open redistricting process.

Posada’s unexpected testimony came on the eighth day of the redistricting trial as King grilled a Republican political consultant, Rich Heffley, about his role in advising the Legislature on redistricting.

Heffley, who was paid $240,000 in 2012 and 2013 by the Republican Party of Florida to assist Senate Republicans on campaigns and redistricting, acknowledged that he often shared maps with political consultants Marc Reichelderfer, Terraferma and Bainter.

“I will tell you that I don't know Mr. Posada,” Heffley said. “I have never had anything to do with submitting maps, and I don't know how they got in the public domain.”

King asked: “Were you creating email addresses for people in their names without their authorization or knowledge?"

Heffley responded, “I did not and I had no knowledge that anybody did that.” 

It is not clear what role Bainter played in the emergence of the Posada map. Bainter testified Thursday during almost three hours of closed-door proceedings.

The plaintiffs rested their case after Bainter’s testimony. George Meros, a lawyer for the Legislature, then asked the court to dismiss the case for lack of evidence.

“There is not a shred of evidence that whatever the political consultants were doing came into the legislative process,” Meros said, adding that without that, there is no proof legislators intended to violate the Constitution.

But John Devaney, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, argued that the Florida Supreme Court has said that any partisan bias nullifies the maps under the Fair District standards. “If it’s not this case, there will never be one,” he said.

Lewis rejected the motion to dismiss the case. The Legislature will begin its defense on Friday. The case is scheduled to end Wednesday.

Read more here:

I approve this message.



Where there is smoke, there is fire......



ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Where there is smoke, there is fire......

Much like the wheels falling off of the Obama admin....



OMG. I'm SHOCKED...SHOCKED, I tell you.



This is our guy, who is also President of the Florida Senate. I met him a few years ago & we had a little chat. I wonder what's on his mind right now.

Weird story involving Florida GOP controlled legislature and the gerrymandering of districts DonGaetz



I don't see why the plaintiffs are charging that the political operatives had an influence. That seems, from reading the posts above, it would be harder to prove than to merely point out the non-compliance with the constitutional amendment recently passed.

Below is the ballot summary for Amendment 6:[28]
“ Congressional districts or districting plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor an incumbent or political party. Districts shall not be drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect representatives of their choice. Districts must be contiguous. Unless otherwise required, districts must be compact, as equal in population as feasible, and where feasible must make use of existing city, county and geographical boundaries.[27],_Amendment_6_(2010)

Are these all "compact"?

Weird story involving Florida GOP controlled legislature and the gerrymandering of districts Plan

Sponsored content

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum