BUSTED HARRY REID OWNS 93 ACRES NEXT to BUNDY RANCH

http://www.truthandaction.org/busted-harry-reid-owns-93-acres-next-bundy-ranch/

Does he pay his bills?

Geeez... he just happened to pick the parcels that will include the business loop off the expressway. How convenient.

Over fifty ranchers shut down and run off... and old bundy is the last one. No wonder reid wants govt force deployed.

So here we have it leftists... corporate commercial interests via govt collusion will turn that land into strip malls.

A 1%r will get richer while another small business man bites the dust and the grass and turtles are destroyed.

Congratulations.

Crickets from the left so obviously this is just another "do as I say and not as I do " moment for the left

I don't think anyone expected you to ignore this any less than benghazi... gunrunning... AP supeonas... NSA spying... etc.

How long has he owned the property? How many miles from the Bundy ranch is this property?........yes, I said miles.

Propaganda is a wonderful thing if it works.

From the comments section:

Margaret
May 04, 06:16
This is a myth. There are several miles between Harry and Bundy. Bundy’s land is below Riverside. If Harry is the criminal(I wouldn’t doubt it) could he be tied in with the John Lonetti Jr. bribery scandal for water rights?


This whole line of attempted manufactured attack on the administration is nothing more than a faint smoke screen to divert the public's attention from the fact that the R's have nothing new to offer. What is their plan? Who are they going to run in 2016? If they had any solid workable ideas or visions for the county they should be pushing those on their right wing media instead of throwing mud balls at this administration.

Maybe the R's are waiting till the last minute to announce that they're running a little known member from the Tea Party so they can watch and laugh as the liberal media does a mad scramble to find dirt on the candidate they've decided to back.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM9dam3TiOc

 

                                  

othershoe1030 wrote:Personally I think it must be connected to Benghazi somehow.

          

seems to me this man has been caught up in underhanded deals like this before. Something to do with a casino.

2seaoat wrote:How long has he owned the property?  How many miles from the Bundy ranch is this property?........yes, I said miles.

Propaganda is a wonderful thing if it works.

Good "ol'" Harry Reid has even made money "selling" land he had sold once years before. I've been in the real estate profession and I've never seen that before or since.

With all his comments lately, he seems to lapsed into dementia.

Over the course of his political career, Reid has been implicated in several serious ethics scandals: •In a 1998 real estate deal engineered by Jay Brown (a former casino lawyer and a longtime friend of Reid), the senator purchased two undeveloped residential-property lots on Las Vegas’ rapidly growing outskirts for approximately $400,000. Reid bought one of the parcels on his own, and the second one jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap supported by Reid. In 2001 Reid sold both of his lots for $400,000 to a limited liability corporation created by Jay Brown, but he never disclosed the sale on his annual public ethics report. Nor did he inform Congress that he held any stake in Brown's company. As far as Congress knew, Reid was still the owner of the two lots he had purchased three years earlier.

In 2004 Brown's company, having negotiated with local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, sold the land to other developers in a deal that earned Reid $1.1 million -- a $700,000 profit on his initial investment. Reid falsely reported the transaction to Congress as a personal land sale.

•In 2001 Reid paid cash for a $750,000 condominium at the Washington, D.C. Ritz-Carlton where he resides. When he subsequently gave Christmas bonuses (in 2002, 2004, and 2005) to the doorman and other support staff at his building, he used $3,300 in campaign donations rather than his own separate funds -- in contravention of federal election law. Reid’s campaign falsely listed the bonuses as campaign “salary” expenditures for two of the years in question, and as a “contribution” for the other year. When news of Reid’s misappropriation of campaign funds became public in 2006, the senator’s office said the listing as salary had been a “clerical error.” Added Reid: “I am reimbursing the campaign from my own pocket to prevent this issue from being used in the current campaign season to deflect attention from Republican failures.”

•In a $286 billion federal transportation bill passed by Congress in 2005, Reid secured $300 million in earmarks for projects in his home state, including $18 million to fund the construction of a bridge spanning the Colorado River. On the Arizona side of that bridge, Reid owned 160 acres of undeveloped land around which many new housing units were being built. Noting that the new bridge would cause the value of Reid’s property to skyrocket, Norman Ornstein, co-author of a book that examines earmarking, said: “It's a really bad idea for lawmakers to earmark projects when they have a financial interest that could in any way be affected by it.” Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, noted: “Unwittingly, the taxpayer may have helped inflate the value” of Reid's land.

•Between 2002 and 2006, Reid intervened to gain monumental government concessions on behalf of a powerful Nevada land developer, Harvey Whittemore, who wished to build thousands of homes and numerous golf courses on 43,000 acres of barren land in an area called Coyote Springs, an hour northeast of Las Vegas. This land had a number of federal restrictions on its use: One-fourth of it was off-limits to developers because of federal protections for an “endangered” species of desert tortoise that dwelt there; another one-fourth was government-owned and was subject to a federal power-line right of way; and the territory overall was rife with streams and washes that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had designated as crucial to the health of the desert’s ecosystem, and was therefore generally off-limits to construction.

Thanks to Senator Reid’s intercession, however, the Bureau of Land Management agreed to relocate the tortoises to an adjacent federal preserve, thereby opening that portion of Coyote Springs to developers.

In 2002 Reid inserted some obscure provisions into a land-management bill that relocated the aforementioned power corridor, thereby apparently freeing Whittemore to build on the 10,500-acre parcel he coveted. But the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee balked at the deal, and Reid in turn negotiated an alternate arrangement where Whittemore was permitted to purchase the land at a fair market rate while the government relocated the corridor.

Finally, in 2005 Reid and fellow Nevada Senator John Ensign used their influence with the EPA to eliminate the environmental-impact obstacle.

In return for Reid’s efforts, Whittemore gave tens of thousands of dollars to the senator’s political campaigns and to his leadership fund (which Reid used to help bankroll the campaigns of fellow Democrats). In addition, Whittemore gave $5,000 to each of Reid's two sons, to finance their efforts to win local political offices. The developer also hired one of those sons as his personal lawyer to represent him in his dealings with federal officials.

•Between 2001 and 2004, Reid wrote at least four letters pressing the Bush administration to take action on certain issues of importance to Indian tribes that were clients of the lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Abramoff, whose staff was in regular contact with Reid’s office, lobbied on behalf of tribes involved in the gambling casino industry; he would later be convicted in federal court for defrauding those tribes. Each time Reid wrote a letter on behalf of the Indian tribes, he collected donations from Abramoff and his lobbying partners and clients around the same time period. All told, these donations totaled nearly $68,000. Also between 2001 and 2004, Reid received more than $50,000 directly from four Indian tribes that were clients of Abramoff

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/SenatorHarryReidsEthicalScandals.html

He is a crook from the looks of it.

Good "ol'" Harry Reid has even made money "selling" land he had sold once years before. I've been in the real estate profession and I've never seen that before or since.

With all his comments lately, he seems to lapsed into dementia.


I am patient. Please show the link in this thread which makes some conduct of reid relevant to the rancher not paying his fees and the US government acting to collect those fees being directed by Reid. All I have seen is some trying to rationalize the non payment of fee due the United States by utilizing the propaganda procedure called association wherein independent acts by Senator Reid are now somehow associated with a deadbeat who lives miles from the Reid property.........One could start a thread about the deadbeat rancher and argue that he should not pay fees, and one could start a thread about Reid being corrupt, but by using the propaganda technique of association you take two unrelated events and try to create a reality which justifies a person not paying their bills to America.........pretty elementary propaganda, and totally without basis.

https://www.google.com/search?q=harry+reid%27s+ties+to+mobsters&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

othershoe1030 wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Good "ol'" Harry Reid has even made money "selling" land he had sold once years before. I've been in the real estate profession and I've never seen that before or since.

With all his comments lately, he seems to lapsed into dementia.


I am patient.  Please show the link in this thread which makes some conduct of reid relevant to the rancher not paying his fees and the US government acting to collect those fees being directed by Reid.  All I have seen is some trying to rationalize the non payment of fee due the United States by utilizing the propaganda procedure called association wherein independent acts by Senator Reid are now somehow associated with a deadbeat who lives miles from the Reid property.........One could start a thread about the deadbeat rancher and argue that he should not pay fees, and one could start a thread about Reid being corrupt, but by using the propaganda technique of association you take two unrelated events and try to create a reality which justifies a person not paying their bills to America.........pretty elementary propaganda, and totally without basis.

Of course the whole point is to make Reid look like a crook and deflect attention and responsibility away from the pin head racist deadbeat who won't pay his fines and fees. To people who engage is fuzzy thinking it is enough that all this property is in Nevada, that Reid and Bundy are both residents of that state, grass grows on all the properties owned by both men, lands were purchased at some point and the Federal Government is involved, see?

It all fits together so logically with the resulting conclusion: Reid is a crook and Bundy is being over-run by Federal Troops because he's standing his ground...or something like that; it's fuzzy but it just feels right.

No one has to make Harry Reid LOOK like a crook. He has always been a crook. The only difference now is that he is getting dementia as well.

Harry Reid owns the adjacent land, a proposed site for a solar farm pushed by a Chinese company being lobbied by Harry Reid's son. Funny how those things work out with good ol' Harry.

No one has to make Harry Reid LOOK like a crook. He has always been a crook. The only difference now is that he is getting dementia as well.

Harry Reid owns the adjacent land, a proposed site for a solar farm pushed by a Chinese company being lobbied by Harry Reid's son. Funny how those things work out with good ol' Harry.


Again.....for the third time, what does any of this have to do with the Bundy ranch or him not paying the federal government?

2seaoat wrote:No one has to make Harry Reid LOOK like a crook. He has always been a crook. The only difference now is that he is getting dementia as well.

Harry Reid owns the adjacent land, a proposed site for a solar farm pushed by a Chinese company being lobbied by Harry Reid's son. Funny how those things work out with good ol' Harry.


Again.....for the third time, what does any of this have to do with the Bundy ranch or him not paying the federal government?

"...Harry Reid owns the adjacent land..."

You would think that being a realtor, poster Markle would know the definition of an "adjoining property".....  

A mile here....a mile there......pretty soon you are talking about owning land in the same state.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

2seaoat wrote:No one has to make Harry Reid LOOK like a crook. He has always been a crook. The only difference now is that he is getting dementia as well.

Harry Reid owns the adjacent land, a proposed site for a solar farm pushed by a Chinese company being lobbied by Harry Reid's son. Funny how those things work out with good ol' Harry.


Again.....for the third time, what does any of this have to do with the Bundy ranch or him not paying the federal government?

"...Harry Reid owns the adjacent land..."

You would think that being a realtor [Realtor], poster Markle would know the definition of an "adjoining property".....  

For your future reference.  Especially since that is all you have...AGAIN.

ad·ja·cent  [uh-jey-suhnt]  Show IPA  

adjective  

1.  lying near, close, or contiguous; adjoining; neighboring: a motel adjacent to the highway.  

2.  just before, after, or facing: a map on an adjacent page.

You just make up definitions as you go along don't you?  I guess that is easier than actually knowing the definition.

By the way, the word Realtor is a trademark and is capitalized.

Now make a new effort to grow up.

Did it not occur to any of you that BOTH Bundy and Reid are assholes.

Harry reid is a elected official and a crook on the tax payer dime. The other guy is a guy being pushed from a place that his family settled in the 1800's so corporations can move in and develop the area.

What ever happens to the cowboy is one thing, but harry reid is and will always be a crook.