Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

No wonder she illegally claimed the Fifth Amendment IRS Documents Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Potential Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups

+2
2seaoat
Markle
6 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Markle

Markle

JW Obtains IRS Documents Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Potential Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups

APRIL 16, 2014

May 9, 2013, email reveals IRS plans to meet with Department of Justice over whether to prosecute groups that “lied” about plans for political activity

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation and Regulatory Affairs Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) today released the following statements in response to the release of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents showing former IRS official Lois Lerner in contact with the Justice Department about potential prosecution of tax-exempt groups:

“The release of new documents underscores the political nature of IRS Tea Party targeting and the extent to which supposed apolitical officials took direction from elected Democrats,” said Chairman Issa. “These e-mails are part of an overwhelming body of evidence that political pressure from prominent Democrats led to the targeting of Americans for their political beliefs.”

“Now I see why the IRS is scared to give up the rest of Lois Lerner’s emails,” said Chairman Jordan. “Not only do these e-mails further prove the coordination among the IRS, the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Justice Department and committee Democrats to target conservatives, they also show that had our committee not requested the Inspector General’s investigation when we did, Eric Holder’s politicized Justice Department would likely have been leveling trumped up criminal charges against Tea Party groups to intimidate them from exercising their Constitutional rights.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/jw-obtains-irs-documents-showing-lerner-contact-doj-potential-prosecution-tax-exempt-groups/

For the record - The IRS Conservative Targeting Scandal involved:
•Hundreds of conservative groups were targeted
•At least 5 pro-Israel groups
•Constitutional groups
•Groups that criticized Obama administration
•At least two pro-life groups
•An 83 year-old Nazi concentration camp survivor
•A 180 year-old Baptist paper
•A Texas voting-rights group
•A Hollywood conservative group was targeted and harassed
•Conservative activists and businesses
•At least one conservative Hispanic group
•IRS continued to target groups even after the scandal was exposed
•And… 100% of the 501(c)(4) Groups Audited by IRS Were Conservative

And, now we know they were plotting to prosecute conservative groups.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/

2seaoat



Rarely can you turn a seven of hearts and duece of clubs into a good poker hand........but many a poker player have tried......they just leave the table with a few less dollars and a world of hurt. Keep playing that hand.

Guest


Guest

It's impressive what you can ignore... your faith in govt is an inspiration to the huddled masses.

Guest


Guest

Seaoat had had his white guilt working for awhile now. The problem is that all these scandals are real and not imaginary.

Guest


Guest

It appears to me that this prez/adin think they can throw one person under the bus for such a BIG illegal mess. So this lady will probably go under the bus. My guess is this lady took her orders from our resident 2 racist in the white house, holder and obummer.

They will have to sell her out eventually to calm things down if it gets too nasty, but then they could always promise her a political seat along the way by favors from the "puppet master".

Sal

Sal

Why don't they give Lerner immunity in exchange for her testimony?

She's offered to testify if granted immunity.

Need a hint?

Guest


Guest

Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

Guest


Guest

From Pitbull and Kesha

It's GOING DOWN TIMBER!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHUbLv4ThOo

Same with this ADMIN....the most corrupt ever.

FACE DOWN BOOTY UP

Sal

Sal

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

I'm not talking about the 5th Amendment, idiot.

She has offered to testify if granted immunity.

Why won't Issa grant it?

The Dems are all for it.

Need a hint?

2seaoat



Their inability to understand is why I cannot wait to invite them to the November poker game, and the big tournament in November 2016........I will send a limo to pick them up.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

I'm not talking about the 5th Amendment, idiot.

She has offered to testify if granted immunity.

Why won't Issa grant it?

The Dems are all for it.

Need a hint?

No wonder she illegally claimed the Fifth Amendment  IRS Documents Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Potential Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQfNA08qfHJfrnBPQy-8g_RTZrnIfguRfnBBLSq8_uqaJ-fl8gG

Because the prosecution doesn't require her testimony for what they're going to do.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD-E-LDc384

 Laughing 

2seaoat



Because the prosecution doesn't require her testimony for what they're going to do.

Who is going to prosecute? The imaginary rabbit Harvey?

Guest


Guest

Certainly not a judicial activist or an administration bent on social justice... they will continue to ignore the means.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:

Who is going to prosecute?   The imaginary rabbit Harvey?

No wonder she illegally claimed the Fifth Amendment  IRS Documents Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Potential Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQZGBJBQmIEKshBjx4gsItOtKVodXlqD1N-Uxnp1FNeo2dbnDi4

I see... So now you're saying there is something to prosecute but the judiciary system is corrupt and won't do it because they favor the current administration.

So much for justice being blind.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfg0_FbIqqw

 Smile 

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seaoat had had his white guilt working for awhile now. The problem is that all these scandals are real and not imaginary.

For once, you're right. The scandals ARE real...just not the one you're claiming. The tax exempt and non-disclosure status of these groups is and always was the real scandal. Again, Lerner was not at the helm. The GOP cooked up this goose to cover their wolf tracks.

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seaoat had had his white guilt working for awhile now. The problem is that all these scandals are real and not imaginary.

For once, you're right. The scandals ARE real...just not the one you're claiming. The tax exempt and non-disclosure status of these groups is and always was the real scandal. Again, Lerner was not at the helm. The GOP cooked up this goose to cover their wolf tracks.

Just wow... you can never expect transparency or accountability in govt at all if you can't afford it to everything.

Your justice is no justice at all... one eye closed does not make it blind. What a sad partisan commentary.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seaoat had had his white guilt working for awhile now. The problem is that all these scandals are real and not imaginary.

For once, you're right.  The scandals ARE real...just not the one you're claiming.  The tax exempt and non-disclosure status of these groups is and always was the real scandal.  Again, Lerner was not at the helm.  The GOP cooked up this goose to cover their wolf tracks.

Just wow... you can never expect transparency or accountability in govt at all if you can't afford it to everything.

Your justice is no justice at all... one eye closed does not make it blind. What a sad partisan commentary.

Eff your "partisanship". The assertion by the GOP that Ms. Lerner did something for which she should be arrested is absolute hogwash. This "scandal" is a smokescreen...nothing more.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/good-lord-republicans-sti_b_5111962.html

"...The IRS is required by law to look at all applicants to see if they are engaged in impermissible political activity. If they are engaged primarily in political activity, they are neither "charities" nor "social welfare" organizations and, by law, are not supposed to receive special tax status allowing them to keep their donors secret. That alone should tell you that something is fishy with the corporate/conservative accusation that the IRS is "targeting" conservative "political" groups. The IRS is required by law to see if groups are "political."

This is really about Republicans trying to stop the IRS from policing the big right-wing political groups that are using special tax status to mask their donors. This is an intimidation tactic; it's an attempt to keep the IRS from seeing if these groups are engaged in political campaign activity and shut down the ones that are, all in an effort to mask their billionaire/corporate and foreign corporate donors..."


Guest


Guest

Then you should support full immediate disclosure to put the matter to rest. It was lerner who setup the question in the first place. She planted it to a reporter because it was going to come out and they wanted to control the narrative.

It apparently worked well enough for SOME people... but not those who would despise targeting of any kind.

You aren't fair.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:Why don't they give Lerner immunity in exchange for her testimony?

She's offered to testify if granted immunity.

Need a hint?

Put her in prison.  Maybe then others will get the hint too.

Didn't President Barack Hussein Obama say that this would be the most transparent administration in our history?

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

I'm not talking about the 5th Amendment, idiot.

She has offered to testify if granted immunity.

Why won't Issa grant it?

The Dems are all for it.


Need a hint?

Gosh, what a shock. So she can take the blame for everything and they get off scot free. Yep, sounds like a Progressive plan!

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Seaoat had had his white guilt working for awhile now. The problem is that all these scandals are real and not imaginary.

For once, you're right.  The scandals ARE real...just not the one you're claiming.  The tax exempt and non-disclosure status of these groups is and always was the real scandal.  Again, Lerner was not at the helm.  The GOP cooked up this goose to cover their wolf tracks.

What wolf tracks.

Sal

Sal

Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

I'm not talking about the 5th Amendment, idiot.

She has offered to testify if granted immunity.

Why won't Issa grant it?

The Dems are all for it.


Need a hint?

Gosh, what a shock.  So she can take the blame for everything and they get off scot free.  Yep, sounds like a Progressive plan!

Wrong answer. 


The answer is that the Repukes know they have nothing, and her testimony would seal the deal.


They don't want her to testify. 


Put her in jail???

rotflmao

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Loser, she waived that right in talking with COWH about this situation.

I'm not talking about the 5th Amendment, idiot.

She has offered to testify if granted immunity.

Why won't Issa grant it?

The Dems are all for it.

Need a hint?

Gosh, what a shock.  So she can take the blame for everything and they get off scot free.  Yep, sounds like a Progressive plan!

Wrong answer.

The answer is that the Repukes know they have nothing, and her testimony would seal the deal.

They don't want her to testify.

Put her in jail???

rotflmao

If Congress has nothing, why did Lois Lerner claim illegally claim protection under the Fifth Amendment?

Why then is she in contempt of congress?

Why would you laugh about her being put in jail?

If it were totally reversed, would you still be laughing?

Is this NOT what was said about the IRS by President Barack Hussein Obama?



Wordslinger

Wordslinger

What our resident Nazi claims is that only one party in Washington is corrupt and deceitful.

But then again Herr Markle never deals with the truth or with facts.

Reality. LOL

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Let's see if I get this right -- the republicans form political activation groups under various titles, and attempt to defraud the IRS by pretending to be charities, to cut their taxes.

The government begins to target these groups, and the justice department is asked if prosecution is warranted.

Is the conflict political? Of course.

The republicans whine that IRS harassment is markedly unfair.

The democrats say the lying right wing bastards deserve what they got.

And so it goes.

What is that old saying -- "two wrongs don't make a right?"

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum