63k documents and three documents did not have Classified in header

Three documents which were not properly classified in the header, rather had the small C lowest level classification in the body of the letter and were SENT to HIllary Clinton, and the FBI director said these were improperly marked when sent to her and out of 63K Documents where three were improperly marked(The FBI director testified to congress that they were improperly marked by the sender) we now have another committee wasting committee time trying to make Hillary a liar. What has been shown is that she did not lie about her emails, and now Republican leadership is going to try to create a controversy when she has been absolved of any wrongful conduct.....pleaseeeeeee, the only liars are those calling for more committee meetings. Try to change the subject from Donald Trump. Try to turn a proven experienced leader into a liar because somebody improperly sent three emails and gave the lowest level classification in the body of the email and did not properly identify the same in the header which is required and was testified by the FBI director, yet all we have heard on this form as the Breitbart make chit up propaganda has spun this nothing event into the biggest waste of time and dollars.

The Trump dumping of a foreign agent is too late to isolate this campaign from the obvious Putin and Russia bias. A Presidential campaign coordinated by foreign nations to harm this country and we are talking about 3 emails improperly sent and identified......really.

2seaoat wrote:Three documents which were not properly classified in the header, rather had the small C lowest level classification in the body of the letter and were SENT to HIllary Clinton, and the FBI director said these were improperly marked when sent to her and out of 63K Documents where three were improperly marked(The FBI director testified to congress that they were improperly marked by the sender) we now have another committee wasting committee time trying to make Hillary a liar.   What has been shown is that she did not lie about her emails, and now Republican leadership is going to try to create a controversy when she has been absolved of any wrongful conduct.....pleaseeeeeee, the only liars are those calling for more committee meetings.  Try to change the subject from Donald Trump.  Try to turn a proven experienced leader into a liar because somebody improperly sent three emails and gave the lowest level classification in the body of the email and did not properly identify the same in the header which is required and was testified by the FBI director, yet all we have heard on this form as the Breitbart make chit up propaganda has spun this nothing event into the biggest waste of time and dollars.

Waste of time? Tell that to the naval petty officer who will be in the brig soon for six pics of classified areas of a nuke sub. He's getting about 6-7 years. Since you admit Hillary has as much, she can have half the time he is getting

Also, there were emails since that instructed aides to print,
Remove portion markings of text ( has classification level) and then resend. Sending classified emails of comfidential through TS/SCI isn't half of her crimes, the rest of it is the obfuscation and cover up of her screw ups

If she doesn't have the ability to understand these laws when kids right out of high school with a diploma as their only academic achievement get it from day one, she's too stupid to be POTUS

There's no sense trying... seagoat will never hold any leftist ruling elite to any standard... any law... not even their own words. Nothing has mattered... and nothing will matter... ever.

You folks are clueless......their is zero criminal culpability, and she is getting roasted as a liar because somebody else sent her three emails which were not properly identified in the Header which the FBI director admitted in the hearing is a REQUIREMENT, yet she is being called a liar where she did not make that mistake, she did not send that email, and she did not see the small C in the body of the email which is exactly what she testified, but why is NOBODY telling the truth about the headers on those three emails......what you folks hiding.....we already know this is one big sham.

Pace, for somebody who alleges he has security clearance and has military experience, you are clueless what the standard is for prosecution....it is like watching three blind mice drive a car......first, you wonder if they can even reach the wheel, and then they stand on each others shoulders to show the world they can drive.......but we charge admission when they go to turn the key....or when Hillary wins in a landslide.

During their exchange, Comey admitted that Clinton, despite her claims of innocence, shared classified information from multiple devices and failed to turn over all of her work-related emails after she was ordered to do so.
GOWDY: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received classified information over her private e-mail. Was that true?

COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent —

GOWDY: So it was not true?

COMEY: That’s what I said.

GOWDY: OK. Well, I’m looking for a little shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was not marked classified on her e-mails either sent or received, was that true?

COMEY: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said ‘I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail, there is no classified material.’ Was that true?

COMEY: There was classified material e-mail.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true?

COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of State.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related e-mails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?

COMEY: No. We found work-related e-mails, thousands that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related e-mails from her personal account. Was that true?

COMEY: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related e-mails in — on devices or slack space, whether they were deleted or whether when a server was changed out something happened to them. There’s no doubt that the work-related e-mails that were removed electronically from the — the e-mail system.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the e-mails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the e-mail content individually?

COMEY: No.

In a later exchange with Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) Comey said Clinton wasn’t sophisticated enough to understand what information was classified and what wasn’t.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/07/watch-rep-trey-gowdy-rip-apart-fbi-director-james-comey-about-hillary-clinton/

Pure travelgate nonsense. When Hillary was trying to get her health care legislation, the Republican attack dog began focusing on Hillary. The head of the travel department was commingling funds and an investigation of the same was suggested under the Reagan administration, and in fact the head of the department was indicted, yet the attack machine tried to pin the removal of a mess which was entirely serving at the will of the President on Hillary, and just like now suggested that she was guilty of perjury......nope......when every word and email over 64k documents are scrutinized and almost seven years of investigation of travel gate which found nothing, and only released the nothing findings which they had before congressional elections until after congressional elections.....you can see the Republicans cannot govern America, and offer nothing for Americans and fear that intelligent and experienced Americans will be elected who will try to govern this nation and not sabotage America. Nothing new here.

2seaoat wrote:You folks are clueless......their is zero criminal culpability, and she is getting roasted as a liar because somebody else sent her three emails which were not properly identified in the Header which the FBI director admitted in the hearing is a REQUIREMENT, yet she is being called a liar where she did not make that mistake, she did not send that email, and she did not see the small C in the body of the email which is exactly what she testified, but why is NOBODY telling the truth about the headers on those three emails......what you folks hiding.....we already know this is one big sham.

Pace, for somebody who alleges he has security clearance and has military experience, you are clueless what the standard is for prosecution....it is like watching three blind mice drive a car......first, you wonder if they can even reach the wheel, and then they stand on each others shoulders to show the world they can drive.......but we charge admission when they go to turn the key....or when Hillary wins in a landslide.

It doesn't take intent to be a crime. That's where you are clueless. You know and understand that by reading the non-disclosure agreement when briefed in to specific programs and EO 12958 is simple enough for a high school graduate to understand. You having never been in the military or held a clearance is the person WRONG in this instance, despite what your mind thinks otherwise.

The FBI recommendation required activist gymnastics to find "extreme carelessness" not the legally culpable "gross negligence". Every citizen should now be able to evoke the "hillary defense" for any legal situation, govt questioning, and especially with the Irs. It'll be her legacy. Heil Hillary..!!