Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Conspiracies for every IQ size.

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Conspiracies for every IQ size. Empty Conspiracies for every IQ size. 3/20/2014, 12:29 am

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

http://listverse.com/2009/09/26/10-more-conspiracy-theories/


The suppression of Free Energy

Tesla

This one actually sounds plausible. Nikola Tesla claimed that free energy was indeed possible, and worked for most of his career to achieve it. The theory claims that he did, in fact, succeed, just before his death in 1943, in discovering the mathematics and mechanics involved, but that the FBI immediately broke into his home and seized all his papers and work, and has never released any of it to the public.

The concept of free energy is, in very general terms, the ability to input x amount of energy into a machine, which will output x + 1 amount of energy. This seems to conflict with the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Tesla believed the law to be incorrect. He invented the Tesla Coil as an attempt to create free energy.

If it is possible, free energy could be perfected and result in the entire planet being powered by a single power source, such as a nuclear power plant, and output all the energy anyone could ever need. An infinite supply of energy at our fingertips, all based on electric output. You can see how this would irritate the oil companies.

They are the cause of the suppression, the theory claims, as no one would have to depend on fossil fuels anymore. Electric input is just as viable as coal input, or gasoline input. Thus, the electricity required to power a lightbulb could be all we need to power the whole world, invent spacecrafts capable of interstellar travel, anti-gravity, etc.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

May I ask you a couple questions?

1.  Do you agree with AmericanSwiss (Mark Schwartz) that it was NOT the American Airlines Flight 175 airliner which crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center?  That instead it was a Boeing 737 or some other aircraft which used the same engines as a 737?

2.  And if you answer,  yes,  you do agree with him,  can you come up with any plausible explanation as to why the "conspirators" would not have crashed the Flight 175 airliner into the WTC and instead used a different aircraft?

3. And do you agree with Schwartz that the only reason I don't accept his theory is because I believe whatever George W. Bush says?

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum