Just wanted to let ya'll know I got a ACA policy on the marketplace.

ppaca wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottgottlieb/2013/10/21/obamacare-and-the-next-shoe-to-drop-people-buying-coverage-on-the-exchanges-will-owe-much-more-money-than-were-being-told/2/

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42051.pdf

ppaca wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottgottlieb/2013/10/21/obamacare-and-the-next-shoe-to-drop-people-buying-coverage-on-the-exchanges-will-owe-much-more-money-than-were-being-told/2/

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42051.pdf

ppaca wrote:You're not putting in any medical information, except it asks if you are disabled or cannot work because of a disability and do you have to have help with activity's of daily living, such as bathing, dressing, etc. Besides estimating your 2014 income, social and address not much to steal. In all these years any life or health application has asked for your social and address and some ask your income and banking info. You don't pay up front if you receive a subsidy, dreams will receive a premium billing for her part that is due by Dec 26th.

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Sal wrote:Good news.


Repukes hate that.


Congratulations. 

Dreamsglore is one of the reasons the system will soon be in a death spiral.

She is older and will be needing far more health care than the young healthy people ObamaCare needs desperately to sign up and pay the astronomical fees in order to cover Dreamsglore.

I'm curious who Dreamsglore believes are paying her subsidy.  Must be coming from President Barack Hussein Obama's stash.

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Sal wrote:Good news.


Repukes hate that.


Congratulations. 

Dreamsglore is one of the reasons the system will soon be in a death spiral.

She is older and will be needing far more health care than the young healthy people ObamaCare needs desperately to sign up and pay the astronomical fees in order to cover Dreamsglore.

I'm curious who Dreamsglore believes are paying her subsidy.  Must be coming from President Barack Hussein Obama's stash.

Seems that would be your line.

I am simply posting FACTS and pose realistic questions.

You and Progressive good friends find the questions impossible to answer, money does NOT grow on trees and none of you have a workable answer so suddenly I'M WHINING?

Most amusing!

Dreamsglore wrote:Yes, I did and it's not too shabby. I retired a couple of weeks ago and took my pension early so I've been busy,however, it took me about a week to get the damn application done. The website is terrible. I got a pretty good subsidy and much of the policy is better than what I had w/ BC/BS Alabama. and for $19 a month. I was paying $84 w/ my employer monthly.

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:Yes, I did and it's not too shabby. I retired a couple of weeks ago and took my pension early so I've been busy,however, it took me about a week to get the damn application done. The website is terrible. I got a pretty good subsidy and much of the policy is better than what I had w/ BC/BS Alabama. and for $19 a month. I was paying $84 w/ my employer monthly.

When I think of where my tax dollars go, I think of you.  Low or no income, lazy or no ambition children following in their parents footsteps.................
The government will take care of your needs via my paycheck.  
Get your obamaphone yet?  Leach.

Dreamsglore wrote:

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:Yes, I did and it's not too shabby. I retired a couple of weeks ago and took my pension early so I've been busy,however, it took me about a week to get the damn application done. The website is terrible. I got a pretty good subsidy and much of the policy is better than what I had w/ BC/BS Alabama. and for $19 a month. I was paying $84 w/ my employer monthly.

When I think of where my tax dollars go, I think of you.  Low or no income, lazy or no ambition children following in their parents footsteps.................
The government will take care of your needs via my paycheck.  
Get your obamaphone yet?  Leach.

FU forum scumbag!

2seaoat wrote:Well, Social Security is in trouble too.  
More people collecting benefits with fewer paying into these programs is just unsustainable, long term.


With each year that passes which does not address the earning limit, you are correct.  However, if in 2016 they simply raise earning limits to 250k, the fund will be solvent through next century.  President Reagan had no problem raising slightly the medicare tax contribution......it used to be Republicans were Republicans and worked for solutions and good government.

Even if nothing was done, benefits would flow at 75% in perpetuity......so this idea of an entire collapse of the Social Security system is pure fantasy.

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:Yes, I did and it's not too shabby. I retired a couple of weeks ago and took my pension early so I've been busy,however, it took me about a week to get the damn application done. The website is terrible. I got a pretty good subsidy and much of the policy is better than what I had w/ BC/BS Alabama. and for $19 a month. I was paying $84 w/ my employer monthly.

When I think of where my tax dollars go, I think of you.  Low or no income, lazy or no ambition children following in their parents footsteps.................
The government will take care of your needs via my paycheck.  
Get your obamaphone yet?  Leach.

FU forum scumbag!

No luck on the obamaphine yet?  Keep trying.  I'm sure you can do it as long as I'm paying for it.

ppaca wrote:You're not putting in any medical information, except it asks if you are disabled or cannot work because of a disability and do you have to have help with activity's of daily living, such as bathing, dressing, etc. Besides estimating your 2014 income, social and address not much to steal. In all these years any life or health application has asked for your social and address and some ask your income and banking info. You don't pay up front if you receive a subsidy, dreams will receive a premium billing for her part that is due by Dec 26th.

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Well, Social Security is in trouble too.  
More people collecting benefits with fewer paying into these programs is just unsustainable, long term.


With each year that passes which does not address the earning limit, you are correct.  However, if in 2016 they simply raise earning limits to 250k, the fund will be solvent through next century.  President Reagan had no problem raising slightly the medicare tax contribution......it used to be Republicans were Republicans and worked for solutions and good government.

Even if nothing was done, benefits would flow at 75% in perpetuity......so this idea of an entire collapse of the Social Security system is pure fantasy.

Yes PRESIDENT REAGAN had no problem although they did not work for the good of the GOVERNMENT but rather for the GOOD OF THE PEOPLE.  Which is why we have a CONSTITUTION.

As you know, President George Walker Bush worked tirelessly to beef up Social Security.  Who fought him with venom and just as tirelessly?  Democrats of course.

Who has stated that there will be NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER to Social Security?  Your good friend and former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.

Like virtually every Progressive program, it has GREAT INTENTIONS...but ALWAYS with other people's money.  Which runs out.

Social Security started out as a great, well laid out plan.  It was a small payment for the last few years of someone's life.  Life expectancy was only a couple of years longer than the age you could begin to receive benefits.  What came in exceeded what was paid out.

Now it makes Bernie Madoff look like an innocent baby.  Now Social Security is the biggest Ponzi Scheme in history.

How many Social Security recipients could afford a cut in their benefits of 25 percent without resorting to living in boxes and eating dog food?

Democrats and Progressives.  They pride themselves on moving forward and innovative ideas.  The trouble is they never look back at the chaos and destruction they have caused much less make any efforts to solve the problem.

Dreamsglore wrote:

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

gulfbeachbandit wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:Yes, I did and it's not too shabby. I retired a couple of weeks ago and took my pension early so I've been busy,however, it took me about a week to get the damn application done. The website is terrible. I got a pretty good subsidy and much of the policy is better than what I had w/ BC/BS Alabama. and for $19 a month. I was paying $84 w/ my employer monthly.

When I think of where my tax dollars go, I think of you.  Low or no income, lazy or no ambition children following in their parents footsteps.................
The government will take care of your needs via my paycheck.  
Get your obamaphone yet?  Leach.

FU forum scumbag!

No luck on the obamaphine yet?  Keep trying.  I'm sure you can do it as long as I'm paying for it.

No such thang as obamaphones,Einstein. But we won't tell anybody. We''ll just let you keep making a dunce outta yourself. LOL!

ppaca wrote:Not bad, but beware the extra cost sharing you are receiving the funds fall under the sequester. I was asking if you looked a the Blue Select network before purchasing? W Florida nor Baptist are in the network. Many doc's are in it and only Sacred Heart and Santa Rosa medical center.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Well, Social Security is in trouble too.  
More people collecting benefits with fewer paying into these programs is just unsustainable, long term.


With each year that passes which does not address the earning limit, you are correct.  However, if in 2016 they simply raise earning limits to 250k, the fund will be solvent through next century.  President Reagan had no problem raising slightly the medicare tax contribution......it used to be Republicans were Republicans and worked for solutions and good government.

Even if nothing was done, benefits would flow at 75% in perpetuity......so this idea of an entire collapse of the Social Security system is pure fantasy.

Yes PRESIDENT REAGAN had no problem although they did not work for the good of the GOVERNMENT but rather for the GOOD OF THE PEOPLE.  Which is why we have a CONSTITUTION.

As you know, President George Walker Bush worked tirelessly to beef up Social Security.  Who fought him with venom and just as tirelessly?  Democrats of course.

Who has stated that there will be NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER to Social Security?  Your good friend and former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.

Like virtually every Progressive program, it has GREAT INTENTIONS...but ALWAYS with other people's money.  Which runs out.

Social Security started out as a great, well laid out plan.  It was a small payment for the last few years of someone's life.  Life expectancy was only a couple of years longer than the age you could begin to receive benefits.  What came in exceeded what was paid out.

Now it makes Bernie Madoff look like an innocent baby.  Now Social Security is the biggest Ponzi Scheme in history.

How many Social Security recipients could afford a cut in their benefits of 25 percent without resorting to living in boxes and eating dog food?

Democrats and Progressives.  They pride themselves on moving forward and innovative ideas.  The trouble is they never look back at the chaos and destruction they have caused much less make any efforts to solve the problem.

And how much are you collecting?

PBulldog2 wrote:

ppaca wrote:Not bad, but beware the extra cost sharing you are receiving the funds fall under the sequester. I was asking if you looked a the Blue Select network before purchasing? W Florida nor Baptist are in the network. Many doc's are in it and only Sacred Heart and Santa Rosa medical center.

That's the network I want! Blue Select, eh? I will have to remember that.

My policy under my former employer became virtually useless when they kicked Sacred Heart out of the network.

stormwatch89 wrote:Good question brought up.

Were you able to pay for your policy and have payment confirmed?