http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sanjay-sanghoee/obamacare-will-be-a-succe_b_4029462.html
Pensacola Discussion Forum
"Credible" sources PaceDog has in the past cited from:PACEDOG#1 wrote:non-credible source....as usual
prker can certainly reply but I will tell you I meet regularly with people in this field such as Leica, Dako, etc, its a hell...................ppaca wrote:Well I think you all know I am on both sides of the fence on this one. I think the success depends on too many variable's no one has foreseen. I think this is great for people who were once uninsurable for one reason or another. If it is going to work across the nation then the state's who did not accept the Medicaid money are going to have to do a turn around. Too many people especially in this area who are falling between the crack's, no subsidy, no medicaid, so they are right back where they started. It's need's quite a bit of work.
Now on to Medical device tax and pkr please reply.
Spoke with someone who is a manufacturer of medical device's in another state the other day. While they said this tax has hurt them a little and is passed on all the way down the line that they have figured that 3 years into it, when ever the tax started, they will have recouped everything they paid in taxes. What do you think?
I mostly agree... but don't think we see the full effect yet. It'll be just another cost that manufacturers will pass on. What the excise tax will accomplish that I see is that the large corps will have the volume to maintain a margin... but smaller dme providers will find it prohibitive. Pretty much the collusion we've become accustomed to... and what I feared in 2009 that prompted my exit from the industry.ppaca wrote:Well I think you all know I am on both sides of the fence on this one. I think the success depends on too many variable's no one has foreseen. I think this is great for people who were once uninsurable for one reason or another. If it is going to work across the nation then the state's who did not accept the Medicaid money are going to have to do a turn around. Too many people especially in this area who are falling between the crack's, no subsidy, no medicaid, so they are right back where they started. It's need's quite a bit of work.
Now on to Medical device tax and pkr please reply.
Spoke with someone who is a manufacturer of medical device's in another state the other day. While they said this tax has hurt them a little and is passed on all the way down the line that they have figured that 3 years into it, when ever the tax started, they will have recouped everything they paid in taxes. What do you think?
Chrissy wrote:prker can certainly reply but I will tell you I meet regularly with people in this field such as Leica, Dako, etc, its a hell...................ppaca wrote:Well I think you all know I am on both sides of the fence on this one. I think the success depends on too many variable's no one has foreseen. I think this is great for people who were once uninsurable for one reason or another. If it is going to work across the nation then the state's who did not accept the Medicaid money are going to have to do a turn around. Too many people especially in this area who are falling between the crack's, no subsidy, no medicaid, so they are right back where they started. It's need's quite a bit of work.
Now on to Medical device tax and pkr please reply.
Spoke with someone who is a manufacturer of medical device's in another state the other day. While they said this tax has hurt them a little and is passed on all the way down the line that they have figured that 3 years into it, when ever the tax started, they will have recouped everything they paid in taxes. What do you think?
Last edited by ppaca on 10/20/2013, 6:35 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : not appropriate)
Yep, it's now around 32,000 pages. Sebelius made sure of that.PACEDOG#1 wrote:It's a 2000+ page boondoggle that we are still finding out things about it
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum