Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Robert Reich (The True Test of American Resolve: Not Attacking Syria But Living Up To Our Ideals at Home)

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan



http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:

http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.
Cannot believe I have found common ground to agree with this guy...the world must be getting flat somehow. LOL

knothead

knothead

PACEDOG#1 wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:

http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.
Cannot believe I have found common ground to agree with this guy...the world must be getting flat somehow. LOL
*****************************************************

Damnit PD, we agree AGAIN . . . . the world must be flat after all! LOL

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

knothead wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:

http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.
Cannot believe I have found common ground to agree with this guy...the world must be getting flat somehow. LOL
*****************************************************

Damnit PD, we agree AGAIN . . . . the world must be flat after all!  LOL


Oh great!   Pacedog, Knothead and Floridatexan  holding hands and singing Kumbaya. Such an imagine.

knothead

knothead

Joanimaroni wrote:
knothead wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:

http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.
Cannot believe I have found common ground to agree with this guy...the world must be getting flat somehow. LOL
*****************************************************

Damnit PD, we agree AGAIN . . . . the world must be flat after all!  LOL

Oh great!   Pacedog, Knothead and Floridatexan  holding hands and singing Kumbaya. Such an imagine.
******************************************************

Anyone remember what our former distinguished Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said regarding US involvement in the Middle East? I'm paraphrasing but if and when our nation considers meddling further into this areas' affairs . . . . . . we need our collective heads examined! (emphasis added)

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

We need to continue to drill for American oil (shale revolution), continue moves toward increasing fuel economy and energy efficiency across the board (we will then use less oil from these intiatives), and give OPEC and those oil-producing Middle Eastern countries the big fat middle finger!

I remember during the 1979 oil crisis that Paul Harvey said we should form an OPEC for wheat, and offer a bushel of wheat for a barrel of oil. That sounded like a good idea then, only this time, we don't need so much of their oil any more (but they sure need our wheat....).

Let them eat SANDwiches!!!!!!

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

knothead

knothead

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:We need to continue to drill for American oil (shale revolution), continue moves toward increasing fuel economy and energy efficiency across the board (we will then use less oil from these intiatives), and give OPEC and those oil-producing Middle Eastern countries the big fat middle finger!

I remember during the 1979 oil crisis that Paul Harvey said we should form an OPEC for wheat, and offer a bushel of wheat for a barrel of oil. That sounded like a good idea then, only this time, we don't need so much of their oil any more (but they sure need our wheat....).

Let them eat SANDwiches!!!!!!

********************************************************

Thanks for reminding us of the brilliance of Paul Harvey Z . . . . .

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:

http://robertreich.org/post/59902516092

We are on the brink of a tragic decision to strike Syria, because, in the dubious logic of the President, “a lot of people think something should be done,” and American “credibility” is at stake. He and his secretary of state assure us that the strike will be “limited” and “surgical.”

The use of chemical weapons against Syrian citizens is abominable, and if Assad’s regime is responsible he should be treated as an international criminal and pariah.

But have we learned nothing from our mistakes in the past? Time and again over the last half century American presidents have justified so-called “surgical strikes” because the nation’s “credibility” is at stake, and because we have to take some action to show our “strength and resolve” — only to learn years later that our credibility suffered more from our brazen bellicosity, that the surgical strikes only intensified hostilities and made us captive to forces beyond our control, and that our resolve eventually disappears in the face of mounting casualties of Americans and innocent civilians — and in the absence of clearly-defined goals or even clear exit strategies. We and others have paid an incalculable price.

On Labor Day weekend we should instead be testing the nation’s resolve to provide good jobs at good wages to all Americans who need them, and measuring our credibility by the yardstick of equal opportunity. And we should strike (and join striking workers) against big employers who won’t provide their employees with minimally-decent wages. We need to commit ourselves to a living wage, and to providing more economic security to the millions of Americans now working harder but getting nowhere.

Mr. President, a lot of Americans do think something should be done — about these mounting problems at our doorstep here in America. We can have more influence on the rest of the world by showing the rest of the world our resolve to live by our ideals here in America, than by using brute force to prove our resolve elsewhere.
Why should anyone strike against a company who won't pay what YOU determine is a "living wage"?

Who and why is ANYONE entitled to a "living wage"?

Guest


Guest

knothead wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:We need to continue to drill for American oil (shale revolution), continue moves toward increasing fuel economy and energy efficiency across the board (we will then use less oil from these intiatives), and give OPEC and those oil-producing Middle Eastern countries the big fat middle finger!

I remember during the 1979 oil crisis that Paul Harvey said we should form an OPEC for wheat, and offer a bushel of wheat for a barrel of oil. That sounded like a good idea then, only this time, we don't need so much of their oil any more (but they sure need our wheat....).

Let them eat SANDwiches!!!!!!
********************************************************

Thanks for reminding us of the brilliance of Paul Harvey Z . . . . .
When I lived in Gitmo from July 71- Jan 75, Paul Harvey would always be on radio when we went home for lunch. I would eat and listen to him as a kid and then we'd get back on the bus and go back to school. And no there was not a lunch room in the schools at Gitmo.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum