Ross was right all those years ago...and he got no respect

I voted for Ross Perot back then.....  

Mr. Perot just donated $1 million to Texas Planned Parenthood.

Floridatexan wrote:
Mr. Perot just donated $1 million to Texas Planned Parenthood.

maybe he became a racist since then?

SeaBass wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
Mr. Perot just donated $1 million to Texas Planned Parenthood.

maybe he became a racist since then?

What does that have to do with anything? I never said anything about him being racist. I give him and his wife kudos for seeing the need and stepping up.

He's a very smart man...He had a good shot at the White House.

SeaBass wrote:I voted for Ross Perot back then.....  

Myself as well...he should have never dropped out and then hopped back in the race.

I voted for him too.

I did not vote for him, and I think he lacked specifics and a platform to deal with the complexities of modern politics. I liked him because he was an Eagle Scout and basically a self made man. He supported Jobs when Apple messed with him, and he had this remarkable instinct which gave him great success in business. He lacked the political sophistication to be effective.

Bob wrote:LETTER FROM GENE TATUM TO ROSS PEROT
====================================

August 1, 1996

Mr. Ross Perot
12377 Merit Drive, Suite 1700
Dallas, Texas  75251

Dear Mr. Perot:

Please find the accompanying  copy  of "The Tatum Chronicles".  I
call your attention to pages 42 through 46.  On March 24, 1985, I
was tasked to fly several passengers to El  Ocotal,  Costa  Rica.
Among  those  present  were  William  Barr  (future  US  Attorney
General),  General  Manuel  Noriega (Panamanian military leader),
General Gustavo  Alverez  (Honduran  Army  Chief  of  Staff), Joe
Fernandez  (CIA),  Mike  Harari  (Mossad),  and  Felix  Rodreguiz
(CIA).

During the meeting, the discussion centered around a large amount
of drugs and money missing from Lt. Col.  Oliver  North's  Contra
drug  manufacturing "Enterprise".  Three distribution points were
discussed:  Ohio, Arkansas, and  Colorado.   The Colorado leg was
discounted as being the source  of  the  loss.   Next,  Ohio  was
discounted.   It  was  determined that the Panama to Arkansas leg
was where the drugs and money  were missing.  A call was made via
SATCOM to the Governor of Arkansas concerning the loss.

This, in itself, should not be a concern to you  or  your  party,
but  as  I  told  you  in  my  letter  dated April 20, 1996, Vice
President  Bush  was  concerned  about  the  Reform  Party  being
contrary to the interests  of  America.   The order to neutralize
you was given to me.  Now this is not normally the first step  in
our  process.   Normally,  Vice  President Bush would exhaust all
diplomatic means before ordering Pegasus on the job.  I must ask,
was there an attempt  to  diplomatically  resolve your starting a
new party?  Only you can answer this.  Because if there was,  you
are  obviously  stalwart in your stand to organize a third party,
Bush be damned.

I believe that Mr. Bush has continued his attempt to  thwart  the
formation and success of the Reform Party via political sabotage.
When  I  refused  to  carry  out  the  neutralization  order  and
threatened  to  disclose  the  documents  in my possession, which
would destroy several major  political  figures, he was forced to
take a different course of action.   Look  at  page  43  of  "The
Chronicles".   Who  do you think the overseer of the Colorado leg
of the "Enterprise" was?   I  would reasonably assume that, since
the Arkansas leg  was  run  by  the  governor  of  Arkansas,  the
Colorado  leg  was  run  by  the governor of Colorado.  So then I
would ask, who  was  the  governor  of  Colorado  in 1985?  If my
memory serves me correctly, Richard Lamm was Colorado's  governor
from  1974  through  1986.  Now, suddenly, from nowhere, Mr. Lamm
has mustered support and  announced  his candidacy in your Reform
Party.  And is further demanding that you step aside  and  let  a
third entity manage the party.

Oh what tangled webs we weave.  Beware my friend, and good luck.

As always, true to America

D.G. "Chip" Tatum

do you believe that bob? or anyone else?

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/TATUM/tatum.html

Bob wrote:http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/TATUM/tatum.html

You do realize what doo doo youre stepping in right?

SeaBass wrote:
do you believe that bob?

I don't know what to believe about this. But I no longer believe much of anything that comes from the government in Washington D.C.

Read the whole page linked below that includes this excerpt...

Tatum says that, in 1992, President Bush instructed him to "neutralize" presidential runner Ross Perot, but he refused to do so. Tatum turned over a copy of an incriminating tape to President Bush, explaining that it would not be released - providing that he, his family and Perot were kept safe. He also told the President that copies of the tape had been placed in six different locations worldwide, saying, "if I didn't contact these capsule-holders by a certain time each year, they are to be sent to the addresses on the packaging". He closed the conversation by stating that when he originally "placed the packages, I gave explicit instructions that if I asked for them to be sent back to me, they were to send them to the addresses on the packages." This, Tatum reasoned, would avoid intimidation or torture.

http://www.wine-storage.com/octopus.html

SeaBass wrote:
You do realize what doo doo youre stepping in right?

The only time I was "stepping in doo doo" was when I believed anything that comes from Fox News, MSNBC or the federal government.

Bob wrote:

SeaBass wrote:
You do realize what doo doo youre stepping in right?

The only time I was "stepping in doo doo" was when I believed anything that comes from Fox News,  MSNBC or the federal government.

LOL

so do you believe this or not. a simple yes or no will work.  

Bob,
It's caca as bush was not VPOTUS in 1996.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Bob,
It's caca as bush was not VPOTUS in 1996.

He's not saying Bush was the VP in 1996, Pacedog. He's suggesting that Bush used Richard Lamm to sabotage Perot's Reform Party and Perot's candidacy in the 96 election. Remember, Perot was a force in both the 92 and 96 elections.

SeaBass wrote:
so do you believe this or not. a simple yes or no will work. 

I don't know if I believe it or not yet,  Chrissy,  so I can't say yes or no.
Just because I'm skeptical of anything the government tells me does not mean that I accept at face value everything that comes from outside the government either.  The government lies,  the media lies and the internet lies.
We have to wade through a lot of lies to ever get to the truth.