Bob wrote: Chrissy wrote:
Hold on there a minute bob.
We have a large population of africans,african people have shorter lifespans
Hold on there a minute, Chrissy.
African immigrants to Europe include European citizens and residents born in or with ancestors from Africa. Though it has increased massively in recent decades, immigration from Africa to Europe is not a recent phenomenon, with Africa and Asia traditionally being the largest sources of migration to the continent.
With over one million migrants a year and 299,000 asylum applications in 2006 alone, Europe is the primary destination for African migrants worldwide. Migratory flows from Africa currently make up the largest share of migration into Europe. The majority of African migrants living overseas are in Europe, approximately 4.6 million, according to the International Organization for Migration. But the Migration Policy Institute believes there are between seven and eight million irregular African immigrants living in the EU - the actual number changing depending on regularisation schemes in the member states. About two-thirds of Africans in Europe are from North Africa (particularly Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia). An increasing number of immigrants are from Western Africa (mainly Ghana, Nigeria, and Senegal).[1][2]
concentrated mainly in Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom.[3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_immigration_to_Europe
do you not read your links before you give them? the black population is still way lower than ours.
we have 40 million
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
and then theres the infant mortality which isnt counted the same in every country. which is why markle brought that up.
The main problem is inconsistent measurement across nations. The United Nations Statistics Division, which collects data on infant mortality, stipulates that an infant, once it is removed from its mother and then "breathes or shows any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles... is considered live-born regardless of gestational age."16 While the U.S. follows that definition, many other nations do not. Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt notes that in Switzerland "an infant must be at least 30 centimeters long at birth to be counted as living."17 This excludes many of the most vulnerable infants from Switzerland's infant mortality measure.
Switzerland is far from the only nation to have peculiarities in its measure. Italy has at least three different definitions for infant deaths in different regions of the nation.18 The United Nations Statistics Division notes many other differences.19 Japan counts only births to Japanese nationals living in Japan, not abroad. Finland, France and Norway, by contrast, do count births to nationals living outside of the country. Belgium includes births to its armed forces living outside Belgium but not births to foreign armed forces living in Belgium. Finally, Canada counts births to Canadians living in the U.S., but not Americans living in Canada. In short, many nations count births that are in no way an indication of the efficacy of their own health care systems.
http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA547ComparativeHealth.html
nationally, black babies are more than twice as likely as white babies to die before the age of 1. Here in Pittsburgh, the rate is five times
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/us/efforts-to-combat-high-infant-mortality-rate-among-blacks.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
so not only do blacks have a lower life span, infant mortality is also much higher.
Theres nothing wrong with the care americans have been getting from this healthcare system. If you want universal healthcare fine, just say it. And when you do, please look at the countries that actually have it so you can see what your going to get. Its not the pretty picture people like to paint. But your free to buy into any propaganda you want. You are after all an american.