LOL! Poetic Justice

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

Margin Call wrote:

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

I find it an odd, disturbing personality flaw when people hope for things to get worse.

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

Margin Call wrote:

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

I find it an odd, disturbing personality flaw when people hope for things to get worse.

nochain wrote:

Margin Call wrote:

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

I find it an odd, disturbing personality flaw when people hope for things to get worse.

Then the idiots who reelected this failure must have a serious and disturbing personality flaw. I never liked Romney but who knows, a dead slug could do better than BHO. Still, it will be amusing to watch the empty suit squirm now that he has lost his fall back excuse of blaming Bush. Hilarious!

stormwatch89 wrote:Three things for sure:

Higher taxes.

Increased deficit.

stormwatch89 wrote:Three things for sure:

Higher taxes.

Increased deficit.

Obama care.

Captn Kaoz wrote:

stormwatch89 wrote:Three things for sure:

Higher taxes.

Increased deficit.

Obama care.

Stormy,

I wish you were wrong but my guess is you are correct. I would like to add another "for sure" thing:

Increased divisiveness

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Captn Kaoz wrote:

stormwatch89 wrote:Three things for sure:

Higher taxes.

Increased deficit.

Obama care.

Stormy,

I wish you were wrong but my guess is you are correct. I would like to add another "for sure" thing:

Increased divisiveness

Captn, I'm not sure it can get anymore divisive than it has been for the last 4 years.

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

he doesn't even have a plan to reduce his own debt that he created, much less a balanced budget..he will kick the can the next four years and leave whomever is elected more of a mess

nochain wrote:OK BHO, you have some leadership requirements - I realize you aren't used to taking on an active leadership role but are you going to get your Dimowits in line enough to work with Repubs or is it going to be 4 more years of BS???

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:OK BHO, you have some leadership requirements - I realize you aren't used to taking on an active leadership role but are you going to get your Dimowits in line enough to work with Repubs or is it going to be 4 more years of BS???

nochain, can you give me an example of something Obama and democrats could do to "work with Repubs", in your mind? Take tax policy, for example. Can you give me an example of something the left could do that would appear as "work(ing) with Repubs"?

nochain wrote:
“Mitt Romney’s fantasy that Senate Democrats will work with him to pass his ‘severely conservative’ agenda is laughable,” spat Reid."

I believe the Dem position has been made clear, time for BHO to exercise some Bill Clinton style diplomacy to get the two sides working together.

How about some ideas from you, if you have any?

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:
“Mitt Romney’s fantasy that Senate Democrats will work with him to pass his ‘severely conservative’ agenda is laughable,” spat Reid."

I believe the Dem position has been made clear, time for BHO to exercise some Bill Clinton style diplomacy to get the two sides working together.

How about some ideas from you, if you have any?

Yes, but you said you would like to see Obama "work with Repubs". I'm just trying to figure out it is that you mean by that. Can you give me an example of that in the context of tax policy?

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:OK BHO, you have some leadership requirements - I realize you aren't used to taking on an active leadership role but are you going to get your Dimowits in line enough to work with Repubs or is it going to be 4 more years of BS???

nochain, can you give me an example of something Obama and democrats could do to "work with Repubs", in your mind? Take tax policy, for example. Can you give me an example of something the left could do that would appear as "work(ing) with Repubs"?

nochain wrote:How about proposing some tax code changes to reduce loopholes and advantages to big business (including banks), a reasonable across the board tax increase since that is critical to getting out of the fiscal mess.

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:How about proposing some tax code changes to reduce loopholes and advantages to big business (including banks), a reasonable across the board tax increase since that is critical to getting out of the fiscal mess.

Wait. I asked you to give me an example of "working with Repubs", and you suggest a tax increase? Have you paid any attention to congressional republicans over the last four years? Honest question.

nochain wrote:What's the matter - have you no faith in YOUR duly elected President? I've listened to both sides and they sound the same. It is the function of the President to present a case both sides can agree to. The fact BHO doesn't give a hoot about compromise could be problematic but then he asked for the job again. Time to deliver with no more weak excuses.

nochain wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:
“Mitt Romney’s fantasy that Senate Democrats will work with him to pass his ‘severely conservative’ agenda is laughable,” spat Reid."

I believe the Dem position has been made clear, time for BHO to exercise some Bill Clinton style diplomacy to get the two sides working together.

How about some ideas from you, if you have any?

Yes, but you said you would like to see Obama "work with Repubs". I'm just trying to figure out it is that you mean by that. Can you give me an example of that in the context of tax policy?

How about proposing some tax code changes to reduce loopholes and advantages to big business (including banks), a reasonable across the board tax increase since that is critical to getting out of the fiscal mess.

Your turn

Rogue wrote:

nochain wrote:Now this will be hilarious to watch! BHO gets to continue sitting in the WH and figure out to pay for Obamacare, goose employment, come up with a viable middle east foreign policy while the place is crumbling, exit Afghanistan, close GITMO, reduce or stop deficit spending, pay down public debt, try not to kill off the middle class, and let's see, what else? But wait - those are things he promised the FIRST 4 years. Now the funny part - he has only himself to blame. Yes, this will indeed be fun to watch.

He never intended to do those things. he wishes the country to be lowered standards as this is his world veiw of killing off the great big evil america. . He is fulfilling his fathers dreams.

boards of FL wrote:

nochain wrote:What's the matter - have you no faith in YOUR duly elected President? I've listened to both sides and they sound the same. It is the function of the President to present a case both sides can agree to. The fact BHO doesn't give a hoot about compromise could be problematic but then he asked for the job again. Time to deliver with no more weak excuses.

But republicans only agree to their side. That's it. Hence why I asked you, what - in your mind - is "working with repubs"? Is it simply doing exactly what they want with them not having to concede anything?

It's almost as if you have zero knowledge of what has gone on in congress over the last four years. I ask you to give me an example of "working with repubs" and you reply with something that would unanimously get shot down by repubs.