Why Obama chose to let them die in Benghazi

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.


They will always buy the lies,FT. NPR has debunked all those fantastic lies and even Bill O'Reilly didn't try to hard to push that garbage tonight arguing w/ Geraldo.

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

President Barack Hussein Obama sat and watched, in real time in the Situation Room while pleas for help were ignored.

If you can be any more cold hearted than to sit back and prevent the finest military in the world from doing what they do best, I don't know how.

This is being covered up not unlike Watergate. NO ONE DIED IN WATERGATE. The outcome could be the same as well.

Alkaia wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

President Barack Hussein Obama sat and watched, in real time in the Situation Room while pleas for help were ignored.

If you can be any more cold hearted than to sit back and prevent the finest military in the world from doing what they do best, I don't know how.

This is being covered up not unlike Watergate. NO ONE DIED IN WATERGATE. The outcome could be the same as well.

Floridatexan wrote:

Alkaia wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Obama hates the military? That's why since day one in office he has worked to help veterans and why Michelle and Jill have made help for veterans their number one cause. Do you really want to talk about "misguided foreign policy"? Really?

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

You choose to believe a lie. It wouldn't take much to find out the truth.

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

You choose to believe a lie. It wouldn't take much to find out the truth.

The truth about what? The youtube video that the White House press Secretary and the United States Ambassador to the United Nations blamed? What we do know now is that was a lie... a cover story... a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people by the Obama administration... why?

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

You choose to believe a lie. It wouldn't take much to find out the truth.

The truth about what? The youtube video that the White House press Secretary and the United States Ambassador to the United Nations blamed? What we do know now is that was a lie... a cover story... a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people by the Obama administration... why?

That's not true.That was the info. they had at the time.

PkrBum wrote:

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

The evidence indicates that it was an organized attack inspired by the YouTube video.

PkrBum wrote:

salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

The evidence indicates that it was an organized attack inspired by the YouTube video.

LOL... well I say it was because obama had done a touchdown dance over Bin Ladin at the DNC. This is easy.

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

President Barack Hussein Obama sat and watched, in real time in the Situation Room while pleas for help were ignored.

If you can be any more cold hearted than to sit back and prevent the finest military in the world from doing what they do best, I don't know how.

This is being covered up not unlike Watergate. NO ONE DIED IN WATERGATE. The outcome could be the same as well.

That is a blatant and boldfaced lie.

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

President Barack Hussein Obama sat and watched, in real time in the Situation Room while pleas for help were ignored.

If you can be any more cold hearted than to sit back and prevent the finest military in the world from doing what they do best, I don't know how.

This is being covered up not unlike Watergate. NO ONE DIED IN WATERGATE. The outcome could be the same as well.

That is a blatant and boldfaced lie.

Really? Who died in the Watergate scandal and Presidential Resignation?

salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

The evidence indicates that it was an organized attack inspired by the YouTube video.

LOL... well I say it was because obama had done a touchdown dance over Bin Ladin at the DNC. This is easy.

I said evidence, dumbass - as in testimonials from natives at the scene.

I'm not interested in your fap fantasies.

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Rogue wrote:It really is. it makes sense knowing how he hates the military.

I was also reading that the las vegas review blasted obama over this blunder yesterday when all this so called new info came out. They really put this whole timeline of BS into perspective.

-----

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in a well-planned military assault on their diplomatic mission in Benghazi seven weeks ago, the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. So why are details surfacing, piecemeal, only now?

The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night, ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/benghazi-blunder-obama-unworthy-commander-in-chief-176736441.html

-------

Still buying the lies, I see. No surprise there. The winger sites would have us believe that the President stood by and cheered while the ambassador was killed, or even pulled the trigger. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Dumbass.

President Barack Hussein Obama sat and watched, in real time in the Situation Room while pleas for help were ignored.

If you can be any more cold hearted than to sit back and prevent the finest military in the world from doing what they do best, I don't know how.

This is being covered up not unlike Watergate. NO ONE DIED IN WATERGATE. The outcome could be the same as well.

That is a blatant and boldfaced lie.

Really? Who died in the Watergate scandal and Presidential Resignation?

This thread is not about the Watergate scandal, troll.

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

You choose to believe a lie. It wouldn't take much to find out the truth.

The truth about what? The youtube video that the White House press Secretary and the United States Ambassador to the United Nations blamed? What we do know now is that was a lie... a cover story... a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people by the Obama administration... why?

That's not true.That was the info. they had at the time.

No it's not... that's the whole point. Believe what you please... or look at the latest info from last week. (hint: not all media is covering it) There were even documents recovered by media in the rubble that show communications... apparently the fbi just left them after their investigation?

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:So what was the youtube video narrative? How many versions are you able to believe without suspicion?

It sure draws a sharp contrast considering your belief that bush blew up the world trade centers... it's not organized thght.

You choose to believe a lie. It wouldn't take much to find out the truth.

The truth about what? The youtube video that the White House press Secretary and the United States Ambassador to the United Nations blamed? What we do know now is that was a lie... a cover story... a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people by the Obama administration... why?

That's not true.That was the info. they had at the time.

No it's not... that's the whole point. Believe what you please... or look at the latest info from last week. (hint: not all media is covering it) There were even documents recovered by media in the rubble that show communications... apparently the fbi just left them after their investigation?

The White House knew well before the press secretary or the UN ambassador spoke that it was not a spontaneous demonstration.

It's self-evident.

You really believe that? The FB just left the documents.Really? Just for arguments sake, let's say they knew it wasn't an demonstration. What were their motives for lying? You're making a big deal out of this so say why they lied?