Obama refuses to answer on Benghazi

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/reporter-obama-would-not-answer-repeated-questions-on-whether-requests-for-help-in-benghazi-were-denied/

Why would that be? What does he have to hide?

Dreamsglore wrote:There is going to be another hearing on 11/15. The President should not answer until the facts are learned. It's foolish to make assumptions that are not in evidence.

2seaoat wrote:Two soldiers were shot this week by Afghan police......now 50 dead this year by friendly fire, and nothing......crickets from the same people who ignore 50 deaths when we should be out of Afghanastan. Could you see people arguing that the President is responsible for those deaths......which as commander in chief.....he actually is, but the specific deployments are his responsibility?

The idiocy of this thread and others on this subject is the lack of understanding that this was a CIA operation. Most of any hearings will require that initially they be done in closed session. However, security has already been partially compromised as folks rush to try to get political advantage over this attack. The silly bottom line is that we conquered a nation with loss of less than 10 Americans and pennies on the dollar spent, and now with this absolute success is attempting to be characterized as some type of failure. The only folks who want this to be a failure are Al Queda, the millitary industrial complex and Israel. All three have an interest in America entering wars which kill our children, waste our treasury, and take us down the least intelligent path. The Ambassador and the CIA operations in Libya have been a huge success. Period.

stormwatch89 wrote:SO, where I think the problem is for many of us, is that it appears to be a blatant politically serving coverup.

We deserve better than that as did those Seals.

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

Floridatexan wrote:

stormwatch89 wrote:SO, where I think the problem is for many of us, is that it appears to be a blatant politically serving coverup.

We deserve better than that as did those Seals.

How about a blantant attempt to politicize a tragedy to sway the election? This is a much more likely scenario than anything coming from the rabid right.

I didn't know about Romney and Netanyahu's old association at the Boston Consulting Group back in the mid-70's. Romney apparently made much of it when he visited Israel on his fund-raising tour, but Bibi denied they were bff's and instead called it a business relationship. Bibi either wanted to keep it quiet or thinks Romney's an idiot for bringing it up at all, or...he doesn't like Romney but prefers him in the WH over Obama, who is not warming to the Israeli agenda in the Middle East.

I wonder...what Ambassador Stevens was doing in a CIA safe house in Bengazi instead of being at the embassy in Tripoli...whether he was set up by the CIA...why there was such a strong CIA presence in that location...

What I don't wonder about is the timing of this incident or the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy. That's pretty transparent.

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

Dreamsglore wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

You are exactly right! They no more care about the American people than Al-Quada does. They deliberately slowed this economy and let people suffer to destroy a President they hate got elected. They are unamerican.

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

You are exactly right! They no more care about the American people than Al-Quada does. They deliberately slowed this economy and let people suffer to destroy a President they hate got elected. They are unamerican.

BLAME is the type of rhetoric you get from losers

2seaoat wrote:Two soldiers were shot this week by Afghan police......now 50 dead this year by friendly fire, and nothing......crickets from the same people who ignore 50 deaths when we should be out of Afghanastan. Could you see people arguing that the President is responsible for those deaths......which as commander in chief.....he actually is, but the specific deployments are his responsibility?

The idiocy of this thread and others on this subject is the lack of understanding that this was a CIA operation. Most of any hearings will require that initially they be done in closed session. However, security has already been partially compromised as folks rush to try to get political advantage over this attack. The silly bottom line is that we conquered a nation with loss of less than 10 Americans and pennies on the dollar spent, and now with this absolute success is attempting to be characterized as some type of failure. The only folks who want this to be a failure are Al Queda, the millitary industrial complex and Israel. All three have an interest in America entering wars which kill our children, waste our treasury, and take us down the least intelligent path. The Ambassador and the CIA operations in Libya have been a huge success. Period.

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Two soldiers were shot this week by Afghan police......now 50 dead this year by friendly fire, and nothing......crickets from the same people who ignore 50 deaths when we should be out of Afghanastan. Could you see people arguing that the President is responsible for those deaths......which as commander in chief.....he actually is, but the specific deployments are his responsibility?

The idiocy of this thread and others on this subject is the lack of understanding that this was a CIA operation. Most of any hearings will require that initially they be done in closed session. However, security has already been partially compromised as folks rush to try to get political advantage over this attack. The silly bottom line is that we conquered a nation with loss of less than 10 Americans and pennies on the dollar spent, and now with this absolute success is attempting to be characterized as some type of failure. The only folks who want this to be a failure are Al Queda, the millitary industrial complex and Israel. All three have an interest in America entering wars which kill our children, waste our treasury, and take us down the least intelligent path. The Ambassador and the CIA operations in Libya have been a huge success. Period.

Idiocy of this thread? The real idiocy is the people like you are hellbent on Obama getting a second term for personal reasons that do not help the country. You're hellbent on hiding the truth because this is the stake that actually KILLS the vampire sucking the country dry on his socialistic agenda. Your boy is going down. The best thing that can happen is for him to lose because, like Nixon, this will catch up to him and he will either have to resign or be impeached. You don't purposely leave your appointed ambassador hanging and not answer for it. Obama really just needs to lose and lose large.

Dreamsglore wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Two soldiers were shot this week by Afghan police......now 50 dead this year by friendly fire, and nothing......crickets from the same people who ignore 50 deaths when we should be out of Afghanastan. Could you see people arguing that the President is responsible for those deaths......which as commander in chief.....he actually is, but the specific deployments are his responsibility?

The idiocy of this thread and others on this subject is the lack of understanding that this was a CIA operation. Most of any hearings will require that initially they be done in closed session. However, security has already been partially compromised as folks rush to try to get political advantage over this attack. The silly bottom line is that we conquered a nation with loss of less than 10 Americans and pennies on the dollar spent, and now with this absolute success is attempting to be characterized as some type of failure. The only folks who want this to be a failure are Al Queda, the millitary industrial complex and Israel. All three have an interest in America entering wars which kill our children, waste our treasury, and take us down the least intelligent path. The Ambassador and the CIA operations in Libya have been a huge success. Period.

Idiocy of this thread? The real idiocy is the people like you are hellbent on Obama getting a second term for personal reasons that do not help the country. You're hellbent on hiding the truth because this is the stake that actually KILLS the vampire sucking the country dry on his socialistic agenda. Your boy is going down. The best thing that can happen is for him to lose because, like Nixon, this will catch up to him and he will either have to resign or be impeached. You don't purposely leave your appointed ambassador hanging and not answer for it. Obama really just needs to lose and lose large.

Your political rantings have nothing in common w/ the truth. Just because you say so doesn't mean squat. The majority of the people will decide just like they did on 08. Good luck in 2012 repugs.LOL!

^^ELVIRA^^ wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

the mear fact of obama taking office was a terorist attack on the country.

the left is a disgusting group of commies who need to be shipped off to cuba

Floridatexan wrote:

^^ELVIRA^^ wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.

the mear fact of obama taking office was a terorist attack on the country.

the left is a disgusting group of commies who need to be shipped off to cuba

M E R E ... what do you think you just accomplished? You really are dumb as a brick.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Two soldiers were shot this week by Afghan police......now 50 dead this year by friendly fire, and nothing......crickets from the same people who ignore 50 deaths when we should be out of Afghanastan. Could you see people arguing that the President is responsible for those deaths......which as commander in chief.....he actually is, but the specific deployments are his responsibility?

The idiocy of this thread and others on this subject is the lack of understanding that this was a CIA operation. Most of any hearings will require that initially they be done in closed session. However, security has already been partially compromised as folks rush to try to get political advantage over this attack. The silly bottom line is that we conquered a nation with loss of less than 10 Americans and pennies on the dollar spent, and now with this absolute success is attempting to be characterized as some type of failure. The only folks who want this to be a failure are Al Queda, the millitary industrial complex and Israel. All three have an interest in America entering wars which kill our children, waste our treasury, and take us down the least intelligent path. The Ambassador and the CIA operations in Libya have been a huge success. Period.

Idiocy of this thread? The real idiocy is the people like you are hellbent on Obama getting a second term for personal reasons that do not help the country. You're hellbent on hiding the truth because this is the stake that actually KILLS the vampire sucking the country dry on his socialistic agenda. Your boy is going down. The best thing that can happen is for him to lose because, like Nixon, this will catch up to him and he will either have to resign or be impeached. You don't purposely leave your appointed ambassador hanging and not answer for it. Obama really just needs to lose and lose large.

Your political rantings have nothing in common w/ the truth. Just because you say so doesn't mean squat. The majority of the people will decide just like they did on 08. Good luck in 2012 repugs.LOL!

Don't forget, this story is sourced from The Blaze.... A totally unbiased source that never spins any of the news it prints.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Your political rantings have nothing in common w/ the truth. Just because you say so doesn't mean squat. The majority of the people will decide just like they did on 08. Good luck in 2012 repugs.LOL!

salinsky wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:the shameless attempts by Republicans to turn it into an indictment of Obama's foreign policy

That's all this is, but it's not surprising.

They've been fervently hoping for a terrorist attack since Obama took office.

The modern conservative movement in the United States is the most unpatriotic and treasonous movement this country has seen in many years.