Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Republicans Are the Scum of the Earth - Part Infinity

+3
Telstar
PkrBum
Sal
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Sal

Sal

Guillen’s father, Jesus Guillen, said he’d asked his son not to try and rescue people in the storm, but he insisted, saying he wanted to help people. He cried and prayed on Sunday afternoon as they pulled his son’s body from the water.

“Thank you, God,” he said, “for the time I had with him.”

The recovery of his body brings the number of people who have died or are feared dead from Harvey to nearly 60, and officials warn that more could be found.

Guillen, who was born in Piedras Negras, Mexico, and moved to Lufkin as a teenager, headed south with his friends toward Houston after Hurricane Harvey, towing a borrowed boat. They were near Interstate 45 and Beltway 8 and trying to reach an apartment complex when they hit the bridge, relatives said.

Alonso Guillen was a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which temporarily lifted the threat of deportation for immigrants brought to the U.S. before they were 16, family members said.

His father is a lawful permanent, but his mother is still in the application process for legal status.
Reached at her home in Piedras Negras, Mexico, across the border from Eagle Pass, Rita Ruiz de Guillen, 62, said she is heartbroken.

“I’ve lost a great son, you have no idea,” she said, weeping softly. “I’m asking God to give me strength.”

She said she hoped U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials would take pity and grant her a humanitarian visa so that she could come to Houston and bury her son, but she was turned back at the border.



http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Missing-volunteer-pulled-from-Cypress-Creek-12170986.php

PkrBum

PkrBum

What does any of that have to do with pubs?

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:Guillen’s father, Jesus Guillen, said he’d asked his son not to try and rescue people in the storm, but he insisted, saying he wanted to help people. He cried and prayed on Sunday afternoon as they pulled his son’s body from the water.

“Thank you, God,” he said, “for the time I had with him.”

The recovery of his body brings the number of people who have died or are feared dead from Harvey to nearly 60, and officials warn that more could be found.

Guillen, who was born in Piedras Negras, Mexico, and moved to Lufkin as a teenager, headed south with his friends toward Houston after Hurricane Harvey, towing a borrowed boat. They were near Interstate 45 and Beltway 8 and trying to reach an apartment complex when they hit the bridge, relatives said.

Alonso Guillen was a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which temporarily lifted the threat of deportation for immigrants brought to the U.S. before they were 16, family members said.

His father is a lawful permanent, but his mother is still in the application process for legal status.
Reached at her home in Piedras Negras, Mexico, across the border from Eagle Pass, Rita Ruiz de Guillen, 62, said she is heartbroken.

“I’ve lost a great son, you have no idea,” she said, weeping softly. “I’m asking God to give me strength.”

She said she hoped U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials would take pity and grant her a humanitarian visa so that she could come to Houston and bury her son, but she was turned back at the border.



http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Missing-volunteer-pulled-from-Cypress-Creek-12170986.php

We are either a nation of laws or not Sal. How long have these folks been here and not completed the process? That's not on the GOP. That's on them. Maybe had the kid been back in Mexico he wouldn't have died from this accident. It's tiring watching glib hucksters such as yourself blame the GOP. It's called personal responsibility.

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:What does any of that have to do with pubs?

Policy, dumbass.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What does any of that have to do with pubs?

Policy, dumbass.

Same policies were in place under odummer.

PkrBum

PkrBum

ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:
Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What does any of that have to do with pubs?

Policy, dumbass.

Same policies were in place under odummer.

Exactly... lol.

Telstar

Telstar

All republicants worship lucifer. He is their lord. They kiss his feet. Twisted Evil

Sal

Sal

The peculiar combination of self-defeating agendas with gratuitous cruelty is solely the province of modern day Republican policy, regardless of who might be sitting in the Oval Office, dumbasses.

zsomething



ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."

PkrBum

PkrBum

zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."

Isn't that what every presidential pardon is? Do you condemn them all? Lol... we know that answer.

#spunup

Telstar

Telstar

zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."



Republicans Are the Scum of the Earth - Part Infinity Sherif11

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."


Did you have any problems with Obama's pardons or just the contempt of court for an 85 year old man that is not the sheriff anymore?

Sounds like this is just partisan BS.

Telstar

Telstar

Joanimaroni wrote:
zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."


Did you have any problems with Obama's pardons or just the contempt of court for an 85 year old man that is not the sheriff anymore?

Sounds like this is just partisan BS.




The love call of the racist Sheriff Joe supporter.


zsomething



Joanimaroni wrote:
zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."


Did you have any problems with Obama's pardons or just the contempt of court for an 85 year old man that is not the sheriff anymore?

Sounds like this is just partisan BS.

Depends on Obama's pardons. I disagreed with the pardon of Chelsea Manning, but at least she served a good bit of time.

Trump pardoned Arpaio for a bunch of racist buddy-buddy shit, and basically says "The courts are irrelevant if you're a friend of mine." He lets that guy out scott-free while deporting a bunch of people who've committed no crime whatsoever.

I know you like the piece of shit because you're too weak to admit a mistake, no matter how embarrassing, but he's morally indefensible. If Obama had done a tenth of the stuff Trump does you'd be screaming about it forever, and you goddamned well know it.

And that ain't partisan, and it ain't B.S.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Barack Obama

5 hrs ·

Immigration can be a controversial topic. We all want safe, secure borders and a dynamic economy, and people of goodwill can have legitimate disagreements about how to fix our immigration system so that everybody plays by the rules.

But that’s not what the action that the White House took today is about. This is about young people who grew up in America – kids who study in our schools, young adults who are starting careers, patriots who pledge allegiance to our flag. These Dreamers are Americans in their hearts, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper. They were brought to this country by their parents, sometimes even as infants. They may not know a country besides ours. They may not even know a language besides English. They often have no idea they’re undocumented until they apply for a job, or college, or a driver’s license.

Over the years, politicians of both parties have worked together to write legislation that would have told these young people – our young people – that if your parents brought you here as a child, if you’ve been here a certain number of years, and if you’re willing to go to college or serve in our military, then you’ll get a chance to stay and earn your citizenship. And for years while I was President, I asked Congress to send me such a bill.

That bill never came. And because it made no sense to expel talented, driven, patriotic young people from the only country they know solely because of the actions of their parents, my administration acted to lift the shadow of deportation from these young people, so that they could continue to contribute to our communities and our country. We did so based on the well-established legal principle of prosecutorial discretion, deployed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike, because our immigration enforcement agencies have limited resources, and it makes sense to focus those resources on those who come illegally to this country to do us harm. Deportations of criminals went up. Some 800,000 young people stepped forward, met rigorous requirements, and went through background checks. And America grew stronger as a result.

But today, that shadow has been cast over some of our best and brightest young people once again. To target these young people is wrong – because they have done nothing wrong. It is self-defeating – because they want to start new businesses, staff our labs, serve in our military, and otherwise contribute to the country we love. And it is cruel. What if our kid’s science teacher, or our friendly neighbor turns out to be a Dreamer? Where are we supposed to send her? To a country she doesn’t know or remember, with a language she may not even speak?

Let’s be clear: the action taken today isn’t required legally. It’s a political decision, and a moral question. Whatever concerns or complaints Americans may have about immigration in general, we shouldn’t threaten the future of this group of young people who are here through no fault of their own, who pose no threat, who are not taking away anything from the rest of us. They are that pitcher on our kid’s softball team, that first responder who helps out his community after a disaster, that cadet in ROTC who wants nothing more than to wear the uniform of the country that gave him a chance. Kicking them out won’t lower the unemployment rate, or lighten anyone’s taxes, or raise anybody’s wages.

It is precisely because this action is contrary to our spirit, and to common sense, that business leaders, faith leaders, economists, and Americans of all political stripes called on the administration not to do what it did today. And now that the White House has shifted its responsibility for these young people to Congress, it’s up to Members of Congress to protect these young people and our future. I’m heartened by those who’ve suggested that they should. And I join my voice with the majority of Americans who hope they step up and do it with a sense of moral urgency that matches the urgency these young people feel.

Ultimately, this is about basic decency. This is about whether we are a people who kick hopeful young strivers out of America, or whether we treat them the way we’d want our own kids to be treated. It’s about who we are as a people – and who we want to be.

What makes us American is not a question of what we look like, or where our names come from, or the way we pray. What makes us American is our fidelity to a set of ideals – that all of us are created equal; that all of us deserve the chance to make of our lives what we will; that all of us share an obligation to stand up, speak out, and secure our most cherished values for the next generation. That’s how America has traveled this far. That’s how, if we keep at it, we will ultimately reach that more perfect union.

***********

Remember when we had a President who cared?

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

zsomething wrote:
Joanimaroni wrote:
zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."


Did you have any problems with Obama's pardons or just the contempt of court for an 85 year old man that is not the sheriff anymore?

Sounds like this is just partisan BS.

Depends on Obama's pardons.   I disagreed with the pardon of Chelsea Manning, but at least she served a good bit of time.

Trump pardoned Arpaio for a bunch of racist buddy-buddy shit, and basically says "The courts are irrelevant if you're a friend of mine."  He lets that guy out scott-free while deporting a bunch of people who've committed no crime whatsoever.

I know you like the piece of shit because you're too weak to admit a mistake, no matter how embarrassing, but he's morally indefensible.  If Obama had done a tenth of the stuff Trump does you'd be screaming about it forever, and you goddamned well know it.

And that ain't partisan, and it ain't B.S.

Chelsea, that's it? It is BS and partisan on your part.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Joanimaroni wrote:
zsomething wrote:
Joanimaroni wrote:
zsomething wrote:
ALTLEFTCRIMINALS wrote:

We are either a nation of laws or not


Considering Trump overruled a court and gave Arpaio a pardon before he served any of the sentence the law had convicted him to... I'm guessing that the answer is "not."


Did you have any problems with Obama's pardons or just the contempt of court for an 85 year old man that is not the sheriff anymore?

Sounds like this is just partisan BS.

Depends on Obama's pardons.   I disagreed with the pardon of Chelsea Manning, but at least she served a good bit of time.

Trump pardoned Arpaio for a bunch of racist buddy-buddy shit, and basically says "The courts are irrelevant if you're a friend of mine."  He lets that guy out scott-free while deporting a bunch of people who've committed no crime whatsoever.

I know you like the piece of shit because you're too weak to admit a mistake, no matter how embarrassing, but he's morally indefensible.  If Obama had done a tenth of the stuff Trump does you'd be screaming about it forever, and you goddamned well know it.

And that ain't partisan, and it ain't B.S.

Chelsea, that's it?  It is BS and partisan on your part.

"sheriff joe" never spent a day in jail. And a pardon is an admission of guilt. I hope he spends his remaining years on this Earth paying other people for the wrongs he's perpetrated. He is pond scum, just like your heroe (!) the orange orangutan (with apologies to the monkeys).

PkrBum

PkrBum

Deus X

Deus X

Floridatexan wrote:the orange orangutan (with apologies to the monkeys).

There are many many differences between monkeys and apes. But let's list some basics to remember right now. . There are only a small number of types of apes, while there are over a hundred types of monkeys. This article will focus more on apes:

Apes are usually larger and heavier than monkeys.
Apes have no tail.
Apes have a more upright body posture than monkeys, and are often able to walk on 2 legs.
Apes have a broad chest.
Apes rely on vision rather than smell, and thus have shorter noses than some monkeys.
Apes have a large brain to body size ratio compared with other animals.
Apes only live in Africa and Asia (monkeys also live in South America).


http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/content/animals/animals/mammals/apevsmonkey.htm

And then, of course, there's this:

Telstar

Telstar

Deus X wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:the orange orangutan (with apologies to the monkeys).

There are many many differences between monkeys and apes. But let's list some basics to remember right now. . There are only a small number of types of apes, while there are over a hundred types of monkeys. This article will focus more on apes:

Apes are usually larger and heavier than monkeys.
Apes have no tail.
Apes have a more upright body posture than monkeys, and are often able to walk on 2 legs.
Apes have a broad chest.
Apes rely on vision rather than smell, and thus have shorter noses than some monkeys.
Apes have a large brain to body size ratio compared with other animals.
Apes only live in Africa and Asia (monkeys also live in South America).


http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/content/animals/animals/mammals/apevsmonkey.htm

And then, of course, there's this:







The mindless monkeys voted the great ape into our white house.

PkrBum

PkrBum

RACISTS..!!

Guest


Guest

PKR, they have to toe the leftist talking points when they disagree and it's always "do as I say and not as a do" here following
The party mantra. Every conservative I know has denounced the alt right,
Yet not one of these clowns denounces Antifa and their communist background and Nazi tactics

PkrBum

PkrBum

They align with a group "called" anti-fascist that uses nazi tactics. It'd be funny if it weren't so sad.

Comrades are easy.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

"...Former White House ethics chief Walter Shaub, who resigned in disgust earlier this year over President Trump’s refusal to give even a cursory regard for ethical behavior in the White House, took to Twitter this evening to call out the President for even considering such an unnecessarily cruel decision.

Follow
Walter Shaub ✔ @waltshaub
A silver spoon-fed pleasure seeker has chosen a National Day of Prayer to destroy the dreams of 800,000 kids who only know this land as home
8:35 PM - Sep 3, 2017
1,128 1,128 Replies 28,164 28,164 Retweets 56,779 56,779 likes

president Trump declared this Sunday to be a “National Day Of Prayer” for the victims of Hurricane Harvey in Texas, but immediately revealed his declaration to be nothing but an insincere stunt for the so-called “religious” right-wing..."

http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/09/04/ethics-chief-resigned-just-gave-best-reaction-trumps-daca-decision/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum