Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

In Break With Precedent, Obama Envoys Are Denied Extensions Past Inauguration Day

+3
Sal
2seaoat
Floridatexan
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


WASHINGTON — "President-elect Donald J. Trump’s transition staff has issued a blanket edict requiring politically appointed ambassadors to leave their overseas posts by Inauguration Day, according to several American diplomats familiar with the plan, breaking with decades of precedent by declining to provide even the briefest of grace periods.

The mandate — issued “without exceptions,” according to a terse State Department cable sent on Dec. 23, diplomats who saw it said — threatens to leave the United States without Senate-confirmed envoys for months in critical nations like Germany, Canada and Britain. In the past, administrations of both parties have often granted extensions on a case-by-case basis to allow a handful of ambassadors, particularly those with school-age children, to remain in place for weeks or months.

Mr. Trump, by contrast, has taken a hard line against leaving any of President Obama’s political appointees in place as he prepares to take office on Jan. 20 with a mission of dismantling many of his predecessor’s signature foreign and domestic policy achievements. “Political” ambassadors, many of them major donors who are nominated by virtue of close ties with the president, almost always leave at the end of his term; ambassadors who are career diplomats often remain in their posts..."

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/us/politics/trump-ambassadors.html?_r=0

2seaoat



His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies. No big deal. Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

Sal

Sal

2seaoat wrote:His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies.  No big deal.  Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

No risk to the nation, but still a dick move.

Many of these people have children in school and other entanglements with which to deal before leaving.

Guest


Guest

I would guess that it's a tit for tat... Obama hasn't stuck to the smooth transition he promised.

2seaoat



Obama hasn't stuck to the smooth transition he promised.


Please elaborate. I do not know what you are implying. Specific examples would help me understand how the President has NOT made the transition smooth.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
2seaoat wrote:His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies.  No big deal.  Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

No risk to the nation, but still a dick move.

Many of these people have children in school and other entanglements with which to deal before leaving.
Less of a Richard Head move than let's say stabbing Netanyahu in the back with the abstention of last week's UN vote.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Tellthetruth wrote:Less of a Richard Head move than let's say stabbing Netanyahu in the back with the abstention of last week's UN vote.

Please elaborate on what it is we owe Netanyahu?

We owe him nothing. He owes President Obama a lot--Obama did greatly increase Israel's already giant foreign aid allocation for the next 10 years.

I am predicting that within a year President Trump will have a testy relationship with Bibi--Bibi is a punk, and Trump isn't going to put up with any shit from him.

Oh, well, I suppose President Trump can suspend deliveries of the F-35 fighter jets Obama authorized for Israel if he needs to bring the petulant Israeli PM back into line. Israel just took delivery of two of the jets and more are on order.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
2seaoat wrote:His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies.  No big deal.  Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

No risk to the nation, but still a dick move.

Many of these people have children in school and other entanglements with which to deal before leaving.

They are part of the elite 1%, who cares?

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Tellthetruth wrote:Less of a Richard Head move than let's say stabbing Netanyahu in the back with the abstention of last week's UN vote.

Please elaborate on what it is we owe Netanyahu?

We owe him nothing. He owes President Obama a lot--Obama did greatly increase Israel's already giant foreign aid allocation for the next 10 years.

I am predicting that within a year President Trump will have a testy relationship with Bibi--Bibi is a punk, and Trump isn't going to put up with any shit from him.

Oh, well, I suppose President Trump can suspend deliveries of the F-35 fighter jets Obama authorized for Israel if he needs to bring the petulant Israeli PM back into line. Israel just took delivery of two of the jets and more are on order.

And we don't owe the minions of Obama anything either. They should all be glad there is no embassy in Benghazi

VectorMan

VectorMan

While the ambassador termination is being treated as a very big story this week, the State Department cable notifying all of the ambassadors was sent on December 23rd, and Inauguration Day is January 20. We’re talking about people with considerable means receiving a month’s formal notice that they need to make new life arrangements, over a month after they knew it would be necessary. Even if some of them were taken aback on Election Day because they swallowed the media and political consensus that Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in, they’ve had plenty of time to adjust to the new reality.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
2seaoat wrote:His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies.  No big deal.  Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

No risk to the nation, but still a dick move.

Many of these people have children in school and other entanglements with which to deal before leaving.

No break with "tradition" whatsoever.

Every Presidential appointee knows their services end the moment a new president takes office, even if they are of the same party. They knew it when they took the position and planned accordingly.

Grow up, join the real world.

Telstar

Telstar

Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:
2seaoat wrote:His right to do the same, and the staffs are the ones who really run our embassies.  No big deal.  Just a cheap shot, but no real risk to the nation.

No risk to the nation, but still a dick move.

Many of these people have children in school and other entanglements with which to deal before leaving.

No break with "tradition" whatsoever.

Every Presidential appointee knows their services end the moment a new president takes office, even if they are of the same party.  They knew it when they took the position and planned accordingly.

Grow up, join the real world.
Markle the grand wizard has spoken!


In Break With Precedent, Obama Envoys Are Denied Extensions Past Inauguration Day Markle25

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum