Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits

NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

Not at all surprising. Looks like we might find out what Hillary Clinton and her family have fought so hard to hide from the government and American voters.

Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits
by KEN KLUKOWSKI2 Jan 2017Washington, DC

WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court has ordered lawsuits by Judicial Watch and Cause of Action seeking to force the federal government to recover Hillary Clinton’s missing emails to move forward, reversing a lower court’s dismissal.

When Secretary of State John Kerry refused to take all lawful measures mandated by federal law to recover Clinton’s emails, Judicial Watch and Cause of Action brought separate lawsuits seeking to force Attorney General Loretta Lynch to launch a Justice Department investigation, a request that federal law says should have originated from Kerry or from the national archivist. A federal trial judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed these lawsuits, holding they were moot and no longer appropriate for judicial action.

[...]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/02/federal-appeals-court-reinstates-clinton-email-lawsuits/

As is well known, I use FACTUAL STORIES, picked up by this source. On the other hand, Progressives source their OPINION stories to their far left Progressive/Socialist sites. A major difference which frustrates them to no end.

2seaoat



A total lie. The story you quoted stated affirmatively that there are missing emails.

seeking to force the federal government to recover Hillary Clinton’s missing emails to move forward

The federal appeal court however told the truth, but you have to read the source, not the editorial posing as news:

Absent a
showing that the requested
enforcement action could not
shake loose a few more emails, the case is not moot.

The Federal Court NEVER told the lie that Breitbart told that here are missing emails, simply that the administrative law requires simply that the SOS should have asked the Archivist for a DOJ investigation which was a mandatory shaking the tree to see if anything else might be out there. NOWHERE in the case does the Appellate Court conclude that there are missing emails, only that the law mandates a referral to the Archivist who then refers to DOJ which can look at the turned over emails and conclude their investigation. It was a technical and consistent ruling that the law does NOT allow the District Court to declare it moot until the referral is made.

How stupid is Mr. Markle. I mean a propaganda piece which attempts to say that the Appellate Court had concluded affirmatively that emails were missing, when they said just the opposite. A perfect example of Doublespeak, and Mr. Markle's propensity to lie some more on this forum dumping propaganda pieces without even reading the underlying cases which he is incapable of understanding.

2seaoat



As is well known, I use FACTUAL STORIES, picked up by this source. On the other hand, Progressives source their OPINION stories to their far left Progressive/Socialist sites. A major difference which frustrates them to no end.


How sweet it is to catch you lying again. I feel it just is not fair that you are incapable of comprehension of concepts and complexities and I continually beat you up for your lies, but heck the idea you think you are frustrating anybody on this forum because of factual stories......now that is hilarious. The story is factual that the Appeals court made a ruling, but it is the distortion and lying about those facts which are routinely identified in almost all your threads which become noxious, spam, and succinctly boring for anybody with a 100 IQ and higher. However, the above quote has given me a big smile as you did not even read the case and beamed with pride that you were being factual when the story was intentionally distorted. Simply a matter of intelligence.

Guest


Guest

That's assuming that none of the emails that she went to great lengths to destroy were work related.

Which I find incredulous... and anyone believing it a drooling idiot.

She brought this entirely upon herself.

2seaoat



That's assuming that none of the emails that she went to great lengths to destroy were work related.

Which I find incredulous... and anyone believing it a drooling idiot.

She brought this entirely upon herself.



Drooling idiot. That is exactly right, but for the wrong reason. You obviously did not read the Appellate case. I read it. What I find ironic in your not reading the basis of this thread you make it obvious "Which I find incredulous...and anyone believing it a drooling idiot." Read the case and get back to me with a napkin to wipe the drool off your face. Oh, in regard to the destruction of emails which the FBI concluded their investigation with no findings which you continually to create in your imagination, you forget one important factor that any third grader understands about email........there are always two data recoveries, one on the server of the sender, and one on the server of the receiver. Too funny with all your wishful projection of wrong doing you do not understand that Hillary Clinton could NEVER assure destruction of any email, and only a drooling idiot would try to destroy government records which could easily be discovered on another server which she had NO control. I can only shake my head because it really is an intelligent thing for people not to read the case, distort the facts with a wish list, and then impute their level of intelligence onto a brilliant and calculated politician like Clinton to think she is as stupid as they are......you just cannot make this stuff up, and I continue to just smile.....all in on Jacks with an ace, king, and queen showing on the flop.......but there may be another jack.....yep drool.

Guest


Guest

Govt records WERE found among the recovered deleted emails... but thousands remain unrecovered.

Do you use one of those plastic covers on your keyboard?

gatorfan



2seaoat wrote:That's assuming that none of the emails that she went to great lengths to destroy were work related.

Which I find incredulous... and anyone believing it a drooling idiot.

She brought this entirely upon herself.



Drooling idiot.  That is exactly right, but for the wrong reason.  You obviously did not read the Appellate case.  I read it.  What I find ironic in your not reading the basis of this thread you make it obvious "Which I find incredulous...and anyone believing it a drooling idiot."  Read the case and get back to me with a napkin to wipe the drool off your face.  Oh, in regard to the destruction of emails which the FBI concluded their investigation with no findings which you continually to create in your imagination, you forget one important factor that any third grader understands about email........there are always two data recoveries, one on the server of the sender, and one on the server of the receiver.   Too funny with all your wishful projection of wrong doing you do not understand that Hillary Clinton could NEVER assure destruction of any email, and only a drooling idiot would try to destroy government records which could easily be discovered on another server which she had NO control.   I can only shake my head because it really is an intelligent thing for people not to read the case, distort the facts with a wish list, and then impute their level of intelligence onto a brilliant and calculated politician like Clinton to think she is as stupid as they are......you just cannot make this stuff up, and I continue to just smile.....all in on Jacks with an ace, king, and queen showing on the flop.......but there may be another jack.....yep drool.

Assuming of course the FBI had a clue where that server was located. If they don't have the original email how do they know who received the deleted (by the originator aka HRC and crew) email???? Drool indeed.

2seaoat



Assuming of course the FBI had a clue where that server was located. If they don't have the original email how do they know who received the deleted (by the originator aka HRC and crew) email???? Drool indeed.


You droolers remind me of the Einstein who decides to delete an item on his computer and puts it in the trash bin. Your technical knowledge of computers and systems are equivalent. I mean, really, are you guys serious. Do you understand that the FBI had the server logs. Do you even have a clue how logs work? Gator, you are smarter than that, and with your background you are not suggesting are you that the FBI did not have all the logs? Are you suggesting that Hillary Clinton messed with the logs on the server, because the FBI certainly said just the opposite. So tell me Gator, how do you think folks figure out what servers the Clinton server made contact. Hold on.....I will get a napkin. Really folks, lets try to elevate the conversation either by reading or taking a computer 101 course.......I guess the irony of these posts give me giggles and grins, but I just had more respect for some folks on this forum.

gatorfan



2seaoat wrote:Assuming of course the FBI had a clue where that server was located. If they don't have the original email how do they know who received the deleted (by the originator aka HRC and crew) email???? Drool indeed.


You droolers remind me of the Einstein who decides to delete an item on his computer and puts it in the trash bin.  Your technical knowledge of computers and systems are equivalent.  I mean, really, are you guys serious.  Do you understand that the FBI had the server logs.  Do you even have a clue how logs work?  Gator, you are smarter than that, and with your background you are not suggesting are you that the FBI did not have all the logs?   Are you suggesting that Hillary Clinton messed with the logs on the server, because the FBI certainly said just the opposite.   So tell me Gator, how do you think folks figure out what servers the Clinton server made contact.  Hold on.....I will get a napkin.    Really folks, lets try to elevate the conversation either by reading or taking a computer 101 course.......I guess the irony of these posts give me giggles and grins, but I just had more respect for some folks on this forum.

Actually you're wrong; you know it and I know it but you would never admit it. Since I am in the SaaS business I know for a fact "logs" as you call them can be erased or overwritten to confuse the index coding, mapping can be altered, and a variety of other methods exist known to a good programmer or systems administrator depending on the operating system or email service in question. HRC certainly didn't do any server "adjustments" personally that's why she hired IT services. She also went through several servers during the time in question. Yes sports fan it's entirely possible records were lost.

Sal

Sal

Good gawd, still with the emails??

It's scarcely worth the time it takes to look in on this forum any longer, much less respond to such idiocy.

Sheesh.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:As is well known, I use FACTUAL STORIES, picked up by this source. On the other hand, Progressives source their OPINION stories to their far left Progressive/Socialist sites. A major difference which frustrates them to no end.


How sweet it is to catch you lying again.   I feel it just is not fair that you are incapable of comprehension of concepts and complexities and I continually beat you up for your lies, but heck the idea you think you are frustrating anybody on this forum because of factual stories......now that is hilarious.   The story is factual that the Appeals court made a ruling, but it is the distortion and lying about those facts which are routinely identified in almost all your threads which become noxious, spam, and succinctly boring for anybody with a 100 IQ and higher.   However, the above quote has given me a big smile as you did not even read the case and beamed with pride that you were being factual when the story was intentionally distorted.  Simply a matter of intelligence.


Have the lawsuits been re-instituted? Yes or no?

2seaoat



It's scarcely worth the time it takes to look in on this forum any longer, much less respond to such idiocy.

Sheesh.

A senior in high school with a little computer knowledge can determine if a computer log has been altered. The FBI made no determination of the same, and if you are suggesting that there can be a stealth removal of logs you are 100% wrong because the Clinton server was connected to the third party server and both had been inspected by the FBI, so much like the fallow and idiotic argument of not being able to determine what servers were connected from the log records, there were two log records, and folks were given immunity from prosecution on the third party server, so not only could it not be done, but there was NO motivation to lie about the same. Just stop it and admit that in fact you do not have knowledge which exceeds the FBI forensic folks. You do not, and this is just more moronic dribble.


Have the lawsuits been re-instituted? Yes or no?
This clown show just keeps on playing out. The guy who thinks the FBI convenes a grand jury, wants to know if the lawsuits have been re-instituted?
NO ....THEY NEVER WENT AWAY BUT WERE ON APPEAL. This is so tedious and boring, but ok, maybe you are capable of learning something. The political witch hunt folks correctly filed a writ of mandamus saying that under the federal records act the archivist or the SOS under the law should have made a referral to the Justice Department for agency action unlawfully withheld in violation of § 706(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. The district court dismissed their suits as moot. The dismissal did not stop the writ just because the appellate court assumed jurisdiction when the notice of appeal was filed.

Now for the the absurdity of this thread. The writ is absolutely correct that the archivist and SOS should have made the referral, and the irony of it is the District Judge is absolutely correct on the substantive facts that in fact the Justice Department had already made the referral to the FBI making it moot. However, the law is clear, either the Archivist or SOS had to make a FORMAL letter requesting the referral. This was not done, and the propagandist cleverly with full knowledge that the FBI had already done the investigation saw the opportunity for stupid people to think that something more had been determined because of a procedural absolute which was not followed, but changes nothing substantively. You really have to be some kind of stupid to post a thread and not even bother to read it, and then telling us that the lawsuit was re-instituted, that the FBI convenes grand juries, and there is no such thing as managing brokers. Tedious, sophomoric propaganda makes this place so unpleasant because intelligent discussions are replaced by superstition and this new religion of fake news as being truth. You post manipulated lies every day, and it is so boring that you do not have the intellect or are too lazy to even bother to read.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Sal wrote:Good gawd, still with the emails??

It's scarcely worth the time it takes to look in on this forum any longer, much less respond to such idiocy.

Sheesh.

Lame Dork poster Markle just can't resist being influenced by that Breitbart Junk. He obviously needs a deprogramming session.

10 of Breitbart's most incendiary headlines

http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/14/media/breitbart-incendiary-headlines/index.html

Breitbart is a website noted for publishing incendiary headlines, many of them being outwardly racist, misogynist, and anti-Semitic. Here are just some of the more provocative headlines that have appeared in 2015/2016:

'The solution to online 'harassment' is simple: Women should log off'

'Bill Kristol: Republican spoiler, renegade Jew'

'Trannies whine about hilarious Bruce Jenner billboard'

'Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy'

'Suck it up buttercups: Dangerous Faggot Tour returns to colleges in September'

'Hoist it high and proud: The Confederate flag proclaims a glorious heritage'

'Would you rather your child had feminism or cancer?'

'Gay rights have made us dumber, it's time to get back in the closet'

'Science proves it: Fat-shaming works'

'There's no hiring bias against women in tech, they just suck at interviews'

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

2seaoat



Breitbart uses classic propaganda techniques which can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. The problem around here is that the same folks are being fooled, and then have the audacity to post the question was the lawsuit re-instated. Let me help you.....when did you stop beating your wife? I appreciate if some folks would not cut and paste and would discuss issues intelligently with the idea of sharing and learning. However, Mr. Markle just pulls his pants down at the party and takes a dump.....day after day. Most intelligent posters have just quietly left the room holding their nose, but this guy is pooping all over forums in Florida and getting paid to do the same. Nobody can be that stupid unless they are receiving a paycheck to post propaganda. I have dear friends who are die hard conservatives who loved the intellectual debates of William Buckley in advancing conservative ideals who are horrified by the spam and lack of intellectual integrity of these internet ghosts who spam multiple sites. I really wish he would stop pooping in the living room, because I like too many people on this forum to leave the party, but it is so tedious holding my nose to his boring behavior.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Breitbart uses classic propaganda techniques which can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. The problem around here is that the same folks are being fooled, and then have the audacity to post the question was the lawsuit re-instated. Let me help you.....when did you stop beating your wife? I appreciate if some folks would not cut and paste and would discuss issues intelligently with the idea of sharing and learning. NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits 6117dd60-5286-4e72-aca8-16189154dc12_zpskdnlvjteHowever, Mr. Markle just pulls his pants down at the party and takes a dump.....day after day. Most intelligent posters have just quietly left the room holding their nose, but this guy is pooping all over forums in Florida and getting paid to do the same. Nobody can be that stupid unless they are receiving a paycheck to post propaganda. I have dear friends who are die hard conservatives who loved the intellectual debates of William Buckley in advancing conservative ideals who are horrified by the spam and lack of intellectual integrity of these internet ghosts who spam multiple sites. I really wish he would stop pooping in the living room, because I like too many people on this forum to leave the party, but it is so tedious holding my nose to his boring behavior.

Have the lawsuits been reinstated and allowed to go forward?

Simple, YES OR NO?

2seaoat



Have the lawsuits been reinstated and allowed to go forward?

Simple, YES OR NO?


No. It is a writ of mandamus which never went away, and the judge will order formally what Justice has already done. Learn what words mean.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits 6117dd60-5286-4e72-aca8-16189154dc12_zpskdnlvjte

NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits Beccb5414c17d1cbcb6ff4b2fe1840ac

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Have the lawsuits been reinstated and allowed to go forward?

Simple, YES OR NO?


No.  It is a writ of mandamus which never went away, and the judge will order formally what Justice has already done.   Learn what words mean.  

You're a hoot! Go down...whining!

NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits AnimatedLaughterPink

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

2seaoat wrote:No.  It is a writ of mandamus which never went away, and the judge will order formally what Justice has already done.   Learn what words mean.  

Lame Dork poster Markle cannot understand what he calls "word salads." I posted some pages that might be more at his reading level above....

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » NOT Surprising...Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Clinton Email Lawsuits

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum