Donald Trump tours disaster area while Obama, Clinton won't be parted from politics and rest

PkrBum wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
It really annoys me that Fox and the rest of the brain dead talking heads are pushing the story that Obama is neglecting the area...nothing of the kind...and that Trump looks "presidential".  Dear God, it's frightening that people buy this BS propaganda...not to mention the thought of Trump in the White House.  

"We can talk about what happened for two days in 2005 and we should. We can talk about levees that couldn't hold, a FEMA that seemed not just incompetent but paralyzed and powerless, about a president who only saw the people from the window of an airplane instead of down here on the ground." Obama 2008

polecat wrote:It's ok BHO was playing on a trump owned golf course... what am I saying trump courses don't allow blac

Markle wrote:

polecat wrote:It's ok BHO was playing on a trump owned golf course... what am I saying trump courses don't allow blac

Wordslinger wrote:Markle, the real story isn't about who plays visiting potentate in Louisiana.  The real story is about your oil producing buddies and how their products are wrecking the world.  The Gulf States have been major players in the oil business.  Maybe the current floods in LA are God's way of saying "enough."   According to Edwards, there's never been flooding in Louisiana like there is right now without a major hurricane.  Consider the mammoth costs of what's taking place in Louisiana and Mississippi.  Then ask yourself:  "Can we afford to continue using fossil fuels?

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Markle, the real story isn't about who plays visiting potentate in Louisiana.  The real story is about your oil producing buddies and how their products are wrecking the world.  The Gulf States have been major players in the oil business.  Maybe the current floods in LA are God's way of saying "enough."   According to Edwards, there's never been flooding in Louisiana like there is right now without a major hurricane.  Consider the mammoth costs of what's taking place in Louisiana and Mississippi.  Then ask yourself:  "Can we afford to continue using fossil fuels?

Cute try.

Instead of attempting to divert attention from the topic of this thread, you'd like to start your own?

PkrBum wrote:"the worst flooding the state has ever experienced"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Mississippi_Flood_of_1927

The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 was the most destructive river flood in the history of the United States,[1] with 27,000 square miles inundated up to a depth of 30 feet. To try to prevent future floods, the federal government built the world's longest system of levees and floodways.

Ninety-four percent of the more than 630,000 people affected by the flood lived in the states of Arkansas, Mississippi and Louisiana, most in the Mississippi Delta. More than 200,000 African Americans were displaced from their homes along the Lower Mississippi River and had to live for lengthy periods in relief camps.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Markle, the real story isn't about who plays visiting potentate in Louisiana.  The real story is about your oil producing buddies and how their products are wrecking the world.  The Gulf States have been major players in the oil business.  Maybe the current floods in LA are God's way of saying "enough."   According to Edwards, there's never been flooding in Louisiana like there is right now without a major hurricane.  Consider the mammoth costs of what's taking place in Louisiana and Mississippi.  Then ask yourself:  "Can we afford to continue using fossil fuels?

Cute try.

Instead of attempting to divert attention from the topic of this thread, you'd like to start your own?

The truth is for anyone other than the President to come to Louisiana to determine the extent of flood damages and what aid would be appropriate, the act is nothing but an attempt to capitalize on a  cheap camera opportunity.  Hillary understands that and Trump, the classless, cheap media mogul, doesn't.  His presence in LA did zero for LA.  The state already had massive media attention because of the flooding.  Instead of debating the worth of Trump's appearance, the issue of what's causing the awful weather that brought the flooding seems far more important and intellectual -- two words you will have to look up.  LOL

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Markle, the real story isn't about who plays visiting potentate in Louisiana.  The real story is about your oil producing buddies and how their products are wrecking the world.  The Gulf States have been major players in the oil business.  Maybe the current floods in LA are God's way of saying "enough."   According to Edwards, there's never been flooding in Louisiana like there is right now without a major hurricane.  Consider the mammoth costs of what's taking place in Louisiana and Mississippi.  Then ask yourself:  "Can we afford to continue using fossil fuels?

Cute try.

Instead of attempting to divert attention from the topic of this thread, you'd like to start your own?

The truth is for anyone other than the President to come to Louisiana to determine the extent of flood damages and what aid would be appropriate, the act is nothing but an attempt to capitalize on a  cheap camera opportunity.  Hillary understands that and Trump, the classless, cheap media mogul, doesn't.  His presence in LA did zero for LA.  The state already had massive media attention because of the flooding.  Instead of debating the worth of Trump's appearance, the issue of what's causing the awful weather that brought the flooding seems far more important and intellectual -- two words you will have to look up.  LOL