Would this Islamic Terrorist Attack NOT have taken place if UGLY, SEMI-AUTOMATIC GUNS were banned from sale?

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:It's actually just a small game rifle. It just looks scarry.

Are you now challenging Markle as bullshit king?  The AR 15 and all its variations was designed by an engineer named Stoner in the 1950s, and the weapon he created was specifically targeted at the U.S. military.

Yes, it's true, you can use a .600 Nitro Express meant for elephants and rhinos on rabbits.  But does that make it a rabbit gun?  LOL

The AR doesn't just look scary -- it usually carries a magazine with a capacity of 30 rounds, which enables the gun to fire as rapidly as the shooter can pull the trigger until the magazine is empty.

Small game rifle, my ass!

And as for rapidity of fire, one only has to watch and listen to the videos from the attack scene -- those bullets were being fired rat-tat-tat fast. Undeniable.

To answer the question in this post title: Yes, it probably wouldn't have taken place nor would there have been the carnage that resulted from this military-style weapon. What hunter would even want a gun like this? Sure, it'd be great if we were invaded by giant rabbits.