Trump admits Bush lied us into invading Iraq -- Markle is left crying.

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

Bob wrote:Look,  Obama may be a muslim and a commie,  Hillary may be the wicked witch of the left,  and Sanders may be an avowed socialist.

But that in no way shape or form takes anything away from George W. Bush making the worst military decision in American history by getting our country into this never ending,  money draining,  life taking insanity in the middle east which has now lasted longer than the whole damn Great Depression and World War 2 combined and which will likely still be going on when that little cracker is dead and buried.

Trump is screaming the truth.  But apparently those redneck inbreds in south carolina are so in love with that little cracker Bush that this could be the end of Trump.

I heard on the news tonight that the people at Jeb's! rally may have gone to the rally but it was basically to see W. They are still voting for Trump. As one voter said: "We're voting with our middle finger!"

I liked that. It really explains the excitement about Trump. He is not controlled by anyone.

"I liked that"

This explains Trump's appeal. It is true. He is thumbing his nose at the entire establishment, party big wigs, lobbyists, the Koch brothers and their pals and on down the line. He doesn't even have to ask John and Jane Q public for a donation, meh. He is having a ball and the establishment is quaking in their boots. That part is beautiful. Who knows where this is going?

I'll just assume that your angst is heartfelt.

Then where is your outrage that the democratic nomination process is corrupt and that the fix is in for hillary?

I am outraged at the DNC and told them so. Schultz scheduled the first few debates at times when hardly anyone would be watching, opposite major sports events or on a Friday or Saturday night when lots of people go out. This was to cut down on Bernie's exposure to new voters or people who did not know him. It was a dirty trick to support the establishment choice

Now they've even changed their rules to allow special interests to donate to the DNC super PAC so they can have access to more money to fight Bernie. I hate this. It confirms my view that the special interests have way too much power in our political system for sure.

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Markle wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

ppaca wrote:

Bob wrote:Look,  Obama may be a muslim and a commie,  Hillary may be the wicked witch of the left,  and Sanders may be an avowed socialist.

But that in no way shape or form takes anything away from George W. Bush making the worst military decision in American history by getting our country into this never ending,  money draining,  life taking insanity in the middle east which has now lasted longer than the whole damn Great Depression and World War 2 combined and which will likely still be going on when that little cracker is dead and buried.

Trump is screaming the truth.  But apparently those redneck inbreds in south carolina are so in love with that little cracker Bush that this could be the end of Trump.

Yes Trump spoke the truth.

If the bush2 war in iraq didn't end when he left office... it certainly ended when obama pulled the troops and declared victory. Everything after that has now become the obama campaign. This chaos in the ME, europe, n.africa belongs to him.

Enjoy comrades.

This bit of wisdom was brought to you by a person who believes that if the people are allowed to participate in their government by way of voting, that is mob rule.  LOL

Well... look at what is necessary here time after time. You must be reminded that it wasnt bush2 that created the "lies" about saddam and wmds.  This is a time that you lived through... a time that you were presumably conscious.

But what happens after it is proved that the narrative was common during the clinton presidency? We get the same damn stupid talkingpoint again. How do you ignore your living through the events? Knowing what was reported and said?

Btw... it's also ridiculous to have to explain basic civics and our form of govt to you. Get a clue comrade.

It never ceases to amaze me what leftists can ignore in order to parrot and believe what they simply wish was true.

Yeah, ignorant rube, I was there for all of it, including the unheeded warnings from Clinton as he left office, including the lies that were told about him trashing the White House, including the multiple official warnings Bush received...remember the one delivered to the Crawford ranch in August, 2001?  When he said, "Now you've covered your ass."?  "It never ceases to amaze me" how backward and delusional one person can be...Herr Pkr...Now I know what "Pkr" means.

No one accused the Clinton Clan of "trashing" the White House, instead the Clinton's STOLE FURNITURE and other pieces.  They ended up paying for or returning the items.  They not only lie but cheat and steal as well.

Certainly you did not learn about this from NPR, MSNBC, CNN, The Nation or the DailyKOS.  All of whom thought the Clintons were entitled.

Clintons Return White House Furniture

[...]

After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.

Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.

[...]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1

Have you ever tried objective research before you post LIES I can disprove with sources and independent, even Progressives sources?

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/01/viral-image/viral-image-wrongly-accuses-clinton-stealing/



And, yes, they're trying to resurrect the lies that were told at the time by Ari Fleischer that damage was done to the White House.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/12/31/many-2016-voters-dont-know-team-clinton-trashed-the-white-house-in-2001-heres-the-gao-report/

As you know.  "Politifact" is published from the same building and has the same editor, writers and employees as the far left Tampa Bay Times.  

Where did I say they did damage?  they simply STOLE from the White House.  Please refer back to my posting.

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

Bob wrote:Look,  Obama may be a muslim and a commie,  Hillary may be the wicked witch of the left,  and Sanders may be an avowed socialist.

But that in no way shape or form takes anything away from George W. Bush making the worst military decision in American history by getting our country into this never ending,  money draining,  life taking insanity in the middle east which has now lasted longer than the whole damn Great Depression and World War 2 combined and which will likely still be going on when that little cracker is dead and buried.

Trump is screaming the truth.  But apparently those redneck inbreds in south carolina are so in love with that little cracker Bush that this could be the end of Trump.

I heard on the news tonight that the people at Jeb's! rally may have gone to the rally but it was basically to see W. They are still voting for Trump. As one voter said: "We're voting with our middle finger!"

I liked that. It really explains the excitement about Trump. He is not controlled by anyone.

"I liked that"

This explains Trump's appeal. It is true. He is thumbing his nose at the entire establishment, party big wigs, lobbyists, the Koch brothers and their pals and on down the line. He doesn't even have to ask John and Jane Q public for a donation, meh. He is having a ball and the establishment is quaking in their boots. That part is beautiful. Who knows where this is going?

I'll just assume that your angst is heartfelt.

Then where is your outrage that the democratic nomination process is corrupt and that the fix is in for hillary?

I am outraged at the DNC and told them so. Schultz scheduled the first few debates at times when hardly anyone would be watching, opposite major sports events or on a Friday or Saturday night when lots of people go out. This was to cut down on Bernie's exposure to new voters or people who did not know him. It was a dirty trick to support the establishment choice

Now they've even changed their rules to allow special interests to donate to the DNC super PAC so they can have access to more money to fight Bernie. I hate this. It confirms my view that the special interests have way too much power in our political system for sure.

But what you "like" to hear... what inspires you to comment... what apparently is important to you...

is the republican candidacy. Ok... good luck with that revolution thingy.

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

Bob wrote:Look,  Obama may be a muslim and a commie,  Hillary may be the wicked witch of the left,  and Sanders may be an avowed socialist.

But that in no way shape or form takes anything away from George W. Bush making the worst military decision in American history by getting our country into this never ending,  money draining,  life taking insanity in the middle east which has now lasted longer than the whole damn Great Depression and World War 2 combined and which will likely still be going on when that little cracker is dead and buried.

Trump is screaming the truth.  But apparently those redneck inbreds in south carolina are so in love with that little cracker Bush that this could be the end of Trump.

I heard on the news tonight that the people at Jeb's! rally may have gone to the rally but it was basically to see W. They are still voting for Trump. As one voter said: "We're voting with our middle finger!"

I liked that. It really explains the excitement about Trump. He is not controlled by anyone.

"I liked that"

This explains Trump's appeal. It is true. He is thumbing his nose at the entire establishment, party big wigs, lobbyists, the Koch brothers and their pals and on down the line. He doesn't even have to ask John and Jane Q public for a donation, meh. He is having a ball and the establishment is quaking in their boots. That part is beautiful. Who knows where this is going?

I'll just assume that your angst is heartfelt.

Then where is your outrage that the democratic nomination process is corrupt and that the fix is in for hillary?

I am outraged at the DNC and told them so. Schultz scheduled the first few debates at times when hardly anyone would be watching, opposite major sports events or on a Friday or Saturday night when lots of people go out. This was to cut down on Bernie's exposure to new voters or people who did not know him. It was a dirty trick to support the establishment choice

Now they've even changed their rules to allow special interests to donate to the DNC super PAC so they can have access to more money to fight Bernie. I hate this. It confirms my view that the special interests have way too much power in our political system for sure.

But what you "like" to hear... what inspires you to comment... what apparently is important to you...

is the republican candidacy. Ok... good luck with that revolution thingy.

The Republican primary race spotlights two things to me. 1) How hugely obvious it is that the special interests (fill in your favorite one here) are really running a great deal of the country and 2) how helpless establishment candidates and office holders are to rebel against their minders.

I am inspired to hear Bernie telling the truth about the income/wealth gap, the shrinking of the middle class, how the system is rigged and how we need change.

Markle wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

Bob wrote:Look,  Obama may be a muslim and a commie,  Hillary may be the wicked witch of the left,  and Sanders may be an avowed socialist.

But that in no way shape or form takes anything away from George W. Bush making the worst military decision in American history by getting our country into this never ending,  money draining,  life taking insanity in the middle east which has now lasted longer than the whole damn Great Depression and World War 2 combined and which will likely still be going on when that little cracker is dead and buried.

Trump is screaming the truth.  But apparently those redneck inbreds in south carolina are so in love with that little cracker Bush that this could be the end of Trump.

I heard on the news tonight that the people at Jeb's! rally may have gone to the rally but it was basically to see W. They are still voting for Trump. As one voter said: "We're voting with our middle finger!"

I liked that. It really explains the excitement about Trump. He is not controlled by anyone.

"I liked that"

This explains Trump's appeal. It is true. He is thumbing his nose at the entire establishment, party big wigs, lobbyists, the Koch brothers and their pals and on down the line. He doesn't even have to ask John and Jane Q public for a donation, meh. He is having a ball and the establishment is quaking in their boots. That part is beautiful. Who knows where this is going?

I'll just assume that your angst is heartfelt.

Then where is your outrage that the democratic nomination process is corrupt and that the fix is in for hillary?

I am outraged at the DNC and told them so. Schultz scheduled the first few debates at times when hardly anyone would be watching, opposite major sports events or on a Friday or Saturday night when lots of people go out. This was to cut down on Bernie's exposure to new voters or people who did not know him. It was a dirty trick to support the establishment choice

Now they've even changed their rules to allow special interests to donate to the DNC super PAC so they can have access to more money to fight Bernie. I hate this. It confirms my view that the special interests have way too much power in our political system for sure.

But what you "like" to hear... what inspires you to comment... what apparently is important to you...

is the republican candidacy. Ok... good luck with that revolution thingy.

The Republican primary race spotlights two things to me. 1) How hugely obvious it is that the special interests (fill in your favorite one here) are really running a great deal of the country and 2) how helpless establishment candidates and office holders are to rebel against their minders.

I am inspired to hear Bernie telling the truth about the income/wealth gap, the shrinking of the middle class, how the system is rigged and how we need change.

$2 TRILLION A YEAR, where does that money come from?  We went from $10 TRILLION in debt to $20 TRILLION in debt just during the term of Lame Duck President Obama.

Don't bother saying "THE RICH".  We don't have that many of them and more of them than ever are leaving the country taking their money with them.

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this!  The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

gatorfan wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this!  The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

Like you and the rest of the armchair quarterback, 20-20 hindsight crowd Trump had no information at that time. He was, and still is, a civilian. He was not in office nor did he inhabit a government office where flawed intelligence data was reviewed.

In short, he was as knowledgeable about what happened as any regular JQ Citizen. So what makes his opinion so important now?

LOL

Salinsky wrote:

gatorfan wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this!  The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

Like you and the rest of the armchair quarterback, 20-20 hindsight crowd Trump had no information at that time. He was, and still is, a civilian. He was not in office nor did he inhabit a government office where flawed intelligence data was reviewed.

In short, he was as knowledgeable about what happened as any regular JQ Citizen. So what makes his opinion so important now?

LOL

Jumpin' Jebus on a pogo stick, ...

... the man is running for President of the United States, and his opinion on the greatest foreign policy debacle in the nation's history is not important??

Sheesh ....

gatorfan wrote:

Salinsky wrote:

gatorfan wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this!  The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

Like you and the rest of the armchair quarterback, 20-20 hindsight crowd Trump had no information at that time. He was, and still is, a civilian. He was not in office nor did he inhabit a government office where flawed intelligence data was reviewed.

In short, he was as knowledgeable about what happened as any regular JQ Citizen. So what makes his opinion so important now?

LOL

Jumpin' Jebus on a pogo stick, ...

... the man is running for President of the United States, and his opinion on the greatest foreign policy debacle in the nation's history is not important??

Sheesh ....

No drone, it's not important now. Is anyones OPINION going to change the fact that for whatever reason the decision was made to invade going to change that decision? I'll help you here, no it's not.

HRC voted for the stupid invasion, now that's who I would question about effective leadership since she was in office and is somewhat responsible for the "debacle" by that yes vote. The trumpet was not and has never been (and hopefully never will be) in a position to influence policy.

Sheesh is right.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:



$2 TRILLION A YEAR, where does that money come from?  We went from $10 TRILLION in debt to $20 TRILLION in debt just during the term of Lame Duck President Obama.

Don't bother saying "THE RICH".  We don't have that many of them and more of them than ever are leaving the country taking their money with them.

How about we pull back our military bases to the USA and stop fighting unnecessary, costly and bloody wars?  Then, with the surplus we can pay more for teachers and less for football players.

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:



$2 TRILLION A YEAR, where does that money come from?  We went from $10 TRILLION in debt to $20 TRILLION in debt just during the term of Lame Duck President Obama.

Don't bother saying "THE RICH".  We don't have that many of them and more of them than ever are leaving the country taking their money with them.

How about we pull back our military bases to the USA and stop fighting unnecessary, costly and bloody wars?  Then, with the surplus we can pay more for teachers and less for football players.

What football players are you talking about?  For most colleges and universities, it is a money making proposition.  You, of course, already know that so why the...untrue...post.

Now, more than ever, we have to make every effort to restore the respect we have lost among our friends and the fear we have lost with our enemies.  We are seeing the results of Lame Duck President Obama's policies of weakness and timidity.  

Salinsky wrote:

gatorfan wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this! The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

Like you and the rest of the armchair quarterback, 20-20 hindsight crowd Trump had no information at that time. He was, and still is, a civilian. He was not in office nor did he inhabit a government office where flawed intelligence data was reviewed.

In short, he was as knowledgeable about what happened as any regular JQ Citizen. So what makes his opinion so important now?

LOL

Jumpin' Jebus on a pogo stick, ...

... the man is running for President of the United States, and his opinion on the greatest foreign policy debacle in the nation's history is not important??

Sheesh ....

Markle wrote:

Salinsky wrote:

gatorfan wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:It doesn't get better than this!  The man who is leading the republican nominating contest by some twenty to thirty points says that Bush lied us into the Iraq war -- that there were no WMD.!

Like you and the rest of the armchair quarterback, 20-20 hindsight crowd Trump had no information at that time. He was, and still is, a civilian. He was not in office nor did he inhabit a government office where flawed intelligence data was reviewed.

In short, he was as knowledgeable about what happened as any regular JQ Citizen. So what makes his opinion so important now?

LOL

Jumpin' Jebus on a pogo stick, ...

... the man is running for President of the United States, and his opinion on the greatest foreign policy debacle in the nation's history is not important??

Sheesh ....

Whether it was a debacle or not is irrelevant today.  What IS important is how to solve the rapidly deteriorating condition in the Middle East.  Lame Duck President Obama has created an incomprehensible mess with hundreds of thousands being killed and millions of refugees flooding Europe and coming to the USA.

As you know too, like many others of your ilk, Donald Trump supported the invasion of Iraq.