Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents AGAIN?? How many more?

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

AGAIN??  How many more?  State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents

Judicial Watch: State Department Finds New Records in Clinton FOIA Litigation
by JOHN HAYWARD
15 Jan 2016

Watchdog group Judicial Watch has been trying to squeeze Hillary Clinton’s documents out of the State Department with Freedom of Information Act requests for years. FOIA requests have a way of turning into FOIA lawsuits before any wing of the Obama Administration responds to them.

Last Friday, three years after one such suit was filed, the State Department suddenly discovered thousands of previously undisclosed Clinton documents.

“This latest find of Clinton records, at this late date, is astonishing,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton declared. “The State Department waited to last possible moment, as it did with the Clinton emails, to tell Judicial Watch and the federal courts about thousands of records that haven’t been searched, as the law requires. Who knew what – and when did they know it – about these new Clinton documents?”

Fitton also thinks the new documents include some significant information. “These newly recovered Clinton records are a potential game changer – and will be of interest to the courts, Congress, and the FBI’s criminal investigation,” he said. “It sure looks like more of the same in terms of Obama administration officials’ obstructing our FOIA requests, obstructing the courts, obstructing Congress, and obstructing justice.”

Fitton further noted that the State Department’s Inspector General recently issued a report finding that responses to information requests about Clinton’s email were “inaccurate and incomplete.”

It’s difficult to see how these inaccurate responses could have been simple mistakes, because the IG report demonstrated that many people who were demonstrably aware of Clinton’s secret private email server chose to feign ignorance.

In the case highlighted by the Inspector General, another watchdog group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington specifically asked if Clinton was using non-governmental email accounts, and even though dozens of high-ranking State officials were very well aware of her black-box server, CREW was told there were no non-gov emails to see.

That’s essentially what happened during the first stage of Judicial Watch’s pursuit of Benghazi documents, too. The State Department claimed it could find no further responsive emails, the case was closed… and then reopened after the existence of Clinton’s secret mail server was revealed.

The Judicial Watch FOIA requests pertained to “the Benghazi scandal and controversies from Clinton’s term at State.” JW has also been pursuing emails from Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The State Department made a court filing on Monday that it would begin releasing 29,000 pages of emails from Abedin, at the rate of 400 pages per month, beginning March 1 and concluding in April 2017.

In other words, the Abedin emails will come out too late to influence the Democrat primary, and most of them will be released after the 2016 election. That’s why you slow-walk FOIA requests and pretend responsive documents just randomly tumble out of closets months or years after you were supposed to produce them, folks.

[...]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/15/state-department-suddenly-discovers-thousands-more-clinton-documents/

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-department-finds-new-records-in-clinton-foia-litigation/

Markle

Markle

State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents   AGAIN??  How many more?   Chirping-crickets-stage-2-by-melvin

The gift that just keeps on giving to the Republicans and Conservatives.

Strange how THEIR State Department keeps on "FINDING" thousands more documents and emails.

Private companies are required to have a protocol in place where their business emails are stored in the event they are necessary in the future.

All these documents and emails were NOT made available to previous investigations which is why this investigation is critical.

Meanwhile, Democrats are whining louder than ever and wishing this would go away!

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Golly, this new information is really in ter es ting zzzzzzzzz.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents   AGAIN??  How many more?   Chirping-crickets-stage-2-by-melvin

The gift that just keeps on giving to the Republicans and Conservatives.

Strange how THEIR State Department keeps on "FINDING" thousands more documents and emails.

Private companies are required to have a protocol in place where their business emails are stored in the event they are necessary in the future.

All these documents and emails were NOT made available to previous investigations which is why this investigation is critical.

Meanwhile, Democrats are whining louder than ever and wishing this would go away!


Gee Mr. Semi-sane Markle, you're on target again.  Like all the liberals on this forum, I think about this terrible problem for the democrats all the time.  Even when taking a dump.  I shed tears continually over this awesome problem that somehow won't just go away.  The only time I find relief from such anguish, is when I sit in a lotus position in front of my 4' X 7' poster of Hillary's smiling face and burn incense.

Truly, I project an agonized scream every time you harp on the Benghazi tragedy. Same as I do each time your conservative co-conspirators vote to destroy Obama care. Thanks be to God you haven't brought up Whitewater lately, or all the murders committed by sweet Hillary Rodham Clinton! Thanks also to you for not mentioning the terminated fetus barbecues at the Clintons' summer quarters ...
 
Thank you!



Last edited by Wordslinger on 1/18/2016, 9:11 am; edited 1 time in total

Guest


Guest

We get it... nothing matters. Comrades like to be lied to by their ruling elite.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents   AGAIN??  How many more?   Chirping-crickets-stage-2-by-melvin

The gift that just keeps on giving to the Republicans and Conservatives.

Strange how THEIR State Department keeps on "FINDING" thousands more documents and emails.

Private companies are required to have a protocol in place where their business emails are stored in the event they are necessary in the future.

All these documents and emails were NOT made available to previous investigations which is why this investigation is critical.

Meanwhile, Democrats are whining louder than ever and wishing this would go away!


Gee Mr. Semi-sane Markle, you're on target again.  Like all the liberals on this forum, I think about this terrible problem for the democrats all the time.  Even when taking a dump.  I shed tears continually over this awesome problem that somehow won't just go away.  The only time I find relief from such anguish, is when I sit in a lotus position in front of my 4' X 7' poster of Hillary's smiling face and burn incense.

Truly, I project an agonized scream every time you harp on the Benghazi tragedy.  Same as I do each time your conservative co-conspirators vote to destroy Obama care.  Thanks be to God you haven't brought up Whitewater lately, or all the murders committed by sweet Hillary Rodham Clinton!  Thanks also to you for not mentioning the terminated fetus barbecues at the Clintons' summer quarters ...
 
Thank you!  


Why put up a post lying?  You too hate Hillary Clinton and even Bernie Sanders is not nearly far enough to the left to satisfy your Socialist desire for America.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents   AGAIN??  How many more?   Chirping-crickets-stage-2-by-melvin

The gift that just keeps on giving to the Republicans and Conservatives.

Strange how THEIR State Department keeps on "FINDING" thousands more documents and emails.

Private companies are required to have a protocol in place where their business emails are stored in the event they are necessary in the future.

All these documents and emails were NOT made available to previous investigations which is why this investigation is critical.

Meanwhile, Democrats are whining louder than ever and wishing this would go away!


Gee Mr. Semi-sane Markle, you're on target again.  Like all the liberals on this forum, I think about this terrible problem for the democrats all the time.  Even when taking a dump.  I shed tears continually over this awesome problem that somehow won't just go away.  The only time I find relief from such anguish, is when I sit in a lotus position in front of my 4' X 7' poster of Hillary's smiling face and burn incense.

Truly, I project an agonized scream every time you harp on the Benghazi tragedy.  Same as I do each time your conservative co-conspirators vote to destroy Obama care.  Thanks be to God you haven't brought up Whitewater lately, or all the murders committed by sweet Hillary Rodham Clinton!  Thanks also to you for not mentioning the terminated fetus barbecues at the Clintons' summer quarters ...
 
Thank you!  


Why put up a post lying?  You too hate Hillary Clinton and even Bernie Sanders is not nearly far enough to the left to satisfy your Socialist desire for America.

What an idiot you are Markle! Bernie is exactly my ideal leader, and is as progressive as I would ever want. As for my lying post ... can you say SARCASM? lol

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:

What an idiot you are Markle!  Bernie is exactly my ideal leader, and is as progressive as I would ever want.  As for my lying post ... can you say SARCASM?  lol

This is no sarcasm, you flat out LIED.

You took for truth the statement made by Hillary Clinton. Here are the FACTS...and this is not SARCASM.

CLINTON: “One out of three African-American men may well end up going to prison. That’s the statistic.”

THE FACTS: That’s a stale statistic, and Clinton isn’t the only person to use it. Sanders has said nearly the same thing. Both drew on 13-year-old data that stated this as a projection, not a fact.

A 2003 report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics said, “About 1 in 3 black males, 1 in 6 Hispanic males, and 1 in 17 white males are expected to go to prison during their lifetime, if current incarceration rates remain unchanged.” But it went on to say that at the time, 16.6 percent of adult black males had actually ever gone to prison, or 1 in 6. The incarceration rate for black men has gone down since then, according to the Sentencing Project.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:

What an idiot you are Markle!  Bernie is exactly my ideal leader, and is as progressive as I would ever want.  As for my lying post ... can you say SARCASM?  lol

This is no sarcasm, you flat out LIED.

You took for truth the statement made by Hillary Clinton.  Here are the FACTS...and this is not SARCASM.
I've never mentioned in this thread anything about the one in three statement by Hillary. Show me how I'm "flat out lying," if you can.

CLINTON: “One out of three African-American men may well end up going to prison. That’s the statistic.”

THE FACTS: That’s a stale statistic, and Clinton isn’t the only person to use it. Sanders has said nearly the same thing. Both drew on 13-year-old data that stated this as a projection, not a fact.

A 2003 report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics said, “About 1 in 3 black males, 1 in 6 Hispanic males, and 1 in 17 white males are expected to go to prison during their lifetime, if current incarceration rates remain unchanged.” But it went on to say that at the time, 16.6 percent of adult black males had actually ever gone to prison, or 1 in 6. The incarceration rate for black men has gone down since then, according to the Sentencing Project.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:

What an idiot you are Markle!  Bernie is exactly my ideal leader, and is as progressive as I would ever want.  As for my lying post ... can you say SARCASM?  lol

This is no sarcasm, you flat out LIED.

You took for truth the statement made by Hillary Clinton.  Here are the FACTS...and this is not SARCASM.
I've never mentioned in this thread anything about the one in three statement by Hillary.  Show me how I'm "flat out lying," if you can.

CLINTON: “One out of three African-American men may well end up going to prison. That’s the statistic.”

THE FACTS: That’s a stale statistic, and Clinton isn’t the only person to use it. Sanders has said nearly the same thing. Both drew on 13-year-old data that stated this as a projection, not a fact.

A 2003 report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics said, “About 1 in 3 black males, 1 in 6 Hispanic males, and 1 in 17 white males are expected to go to prison during their lifetime, if current incarceration rates remain unchanged.” But it went on to say that at the time, 16.6 percent of adult black males had actually ever gone to prison, or 1 in 6. The incarceration rate for black men has gone down since then, according to the Sentencing Project.

Curious, you discovered that what you posted is not accurate.  When called on your lie, you look a bit further and discover that what you posted is indeed NOT TRUE.  Then you back pedal and try the SARCASM defense.  I have no clue as to what, in your mind, sarcasm has to do with lying.

Allow me to help you. First, as you know only a skilled writer can be successful at transferring sarcasm to the written page. Hemingway was a master but we have no Hemingway's on this forum.

sarcasm
[sahr-kaz-uh m]
Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.

2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark:

Wordslinger, please show us where lying is included in the definition of sarcasm.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:

What an idiot you are Markle!  Bernie is exactly my ideal leader, and is as progressive as I would ever want.  As for my lying post ... can you say SARCASM?  lol

This is no sarcasm, you flat out LIED.

You took for truth the statement made by Hillary Clinton.  Here are the FACTS...and this is not SARCASM.
I've never mentioned in this thread anything about the one in three statement by Hillary.  Show me how I'm "flat out lying," if you can.

CLINTON: “One out of three African-American men may well end up going to prison. That’s the statistic.”

THE FACTS: That’s a stale statistic, and Clinton isn’t the only person to use it. Sanders has said nearly the same thing. Both drew on 13-year-old data that stated this as a projection, not a fact.

A 2003 report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics said, “About 1 in 3 black males, 1 in 6 Hispanic males, and 1 in 17 white males are expected to go to prison during their lifetime, if current incarceration rates remain unchanged.” But it went on to say that at the time, 16.6 percent of adult black males had actually ever gone to prison, or 1 in 6. The incarceration rate for black men has gone down since then, according to the Sentencing Project.

Curious, you discovered that what you posted is not accurate.  When called on your lie, you look a bit further and discover that what you posted is indeed NOT TRUE.  Then you back pedal and try the SARCASM defense.  I have no clue as to what, in your mind, sarcasm has to do with lying.

Allow me to help you.  First, as you know only a skilled writer can be successful at transferring sarcasm to the written page.  Hemingway was a master but we have no Hemingway's on this forum.

sarcasm
[sahr-kaz-uh m]
Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
noun
1.  harsh or bitter derision or irony.

2.  a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark:

Wordslinger, please show us where lying is included in the definition of sarcasm.  

I think you really are doubling up on your prozac! Once again Mr. Incredible, SHOW ME THE LIE YOU CLAIM I MADE IN THIS THREAD AND NOT JUST IN THE WINDMILLS OF YOUR Semi-sane mind ...

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Psssst! Semi-sane Markle: I just figured it out. You're responding to a different thread. Do so there and I'll respond. Are you having a senior moment? LOL

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

Someday Huma Abedin will flee this country back to Saudi Arabia where she's from to avoid prosecution as a spy ..... and what will the US Government do about it when the Saudis refuse to hand her over?

They executed Mata Hari .... by firing squad!

State Department Suddenly Discovers Thousands More Clinton Documents   AGAIN??  How many more?   20-mata-hari-sexy-spy-articlemostwanted

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum