Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet?

2 posters

Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet?

Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet? I_vote_lcap100%Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet? I_vote_rcap 100% [ 2 ]
Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet? I_vote_lcap0%Should monopoly ISPs be allowed to block municipalities from offering their own low cost, high speed internet? I_vote_rcap 0% [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 2


Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

boards of FL

boards of FL

https://theintercept.com/2015/12/14/marco-rubio-pushes-to-block-low-cost-high-speed-broadband/



Why is it that republicans are so desperate to 1) restrict access to the voting booth, 2) aggressively gerrymander districts, and 3) control access to and content that is available on the internet?

When you can't compete in the arena of policy, these are the only strategies you have left.

It is simply amazing that we even have to debate things like this.  It's scary in fact.  What will republicans be able to convince our most cognitively challenged block of voters of next?  If they can convince people to agree that $70 for internet that is 50 times faster than their local ISP monopoly is a bad thing, what can't they convince them of?  If they can convince people that the internet would be better if it were closed and ISPs were allowed to pick and choose which content you have access to, what can't they convince them of?


In a rare senatorial act, full-time Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio joined with a handful of fellow legislators on Friday in an attempt to block local municipalities from undercutting big telecom companies by providing cheap, fast internet service.

Rubio, who is raising campaign cash from the telecom industry for his presidential campaign, fired off a letter to the Federal Communications Commission asking the agency to allow states to block municipal broadband services.

The letter was the latest salvo in a long-running effort by the major telecom companies to outlaw municipal broadband programs that have taken off in cities such as Lafayette, Louisiana, and Chattanooga, Tennessee, because they pose a threat to a business model that calls for slow, expensive internet access without competition.

In Chattanooga, for instance, city officials set up a service known as “The Gig,” a municipal broadband network that provides data transfers at one gigabit per second for less than $70 a month — a rate that is 50 times faster than the average speed American customers have available through private broadband networks.

AT&T, Cox Communications, Comcast, and other broadband providers, fearing competition, have used their influence in state government to make an end-run around local municipalities. Through surrogates like the American Legislative Exchange Council, the industry gets states to pass laws that ban municipal broadband networks, despite the obvious benefits to both the municipalities and their residents.

That’s why the FCC has become involved. The agency stepped in to prevent states from crushing municipal broadband and released a rule this year that allows local cities to make the decision on their own.

As a result, telecom companies are furiously lobbying the FCC, litigating the rule in court, and leaning on GOP lawmakers to pressure the agency to back down. As the Daily Dot reported, the letter released by Rubio and other senators expresses “serious concern” about the FCC rule. “The FCC is promoting government-owned networks at the possible expense of private sector broadband providers … who have made strides to deploy networks throughout the country,” Rubio and seven other Republican senators wrote.

Rubio’s presidential campaign has relied heavily on AT&T lobbyist Scott Weaver, the public policy co-chair of Wiley Rein, a law firm that also is helping to litigate against the FCC’s effort to help municipal broadband. As one of Rubio’s three lobbyist-bundlers, Weaver raised $33,324 for Rubio’s presidential campaign, according to disclosures.

Rubio’s campaign fundraising apparatus is also managed in part by Cesar Conda, a lobbyist who previously served as Rubio’s chief of staff. Registration documents show that Conda now represents AT&T.


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

And here is the letter in question before any of those cognitively challenged voters chime in with "That's a liberal commie website!"

http://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/81c82846-aa7c-42fe-be4d-11b0f9527db0/12.11.15-letter-to-fcc-chairman-wheeler-on-municipal-broadband-final.pdf


GOP 2016! Fighting to oppress the LGBT community, fighting to bring the bible into your science class, fighting to bring us into another full scale occupation in the middle east, fighting to censor or entirely block your access to the internet, fighting to make it harder for you to vote, fighting to make your vote not even count, and wasting your time and money on neverending investigations into entirely fabricated conspiracy theories! GOP 2016!


_________________
I approve this message.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

I despise AT&T. We were much better off with the regional Bells. I still have a land line, which isn't really that expensive, but my internet is now just under $50/month, when new customers pay $20-$25. I'm supposed to have the fastest service available, but that varies throughout the day...so, I'm not even getting what I pay for. I had Cox at one time, when I paid for cable TV, but I despise having to accept worthless programming as part of a package deal. I don't need 10 "Christian" channels. I don't care to watch FOX. I tried Dish Network. They "lost" my payment and cut off my service for 2 weeks until it was "found". The equipment they gave me only half worked. At this point, I wish I had another option. Now that AT&T has bought Direct TV, it's only going to get worse.

Rubio looks like a little boy in a man's body. I don't understand how he's getting any traction at all. He's obviously corrupt. I wonder how his wife stands him.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum