Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Time to Get Onboard the Hillary Campaign

+3
2seaoat
Vikingwoman
Sal
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Sal

Sal

I wrote this Wednesday ...

Salinsky wrote:The rationale for Clinton as the nominee is solidifying.

With her strong debate performance and rising poll numbers, Bernie supporters need to come to terms with this fact.

I like Bernie, but his campaign is becoming even more of a huge long shot.

The important thing is keeping a Republican out of the Oval Office.



After yesterday's appearance before the committee, I feel even more strongly that Hillary is the candidate.

This guy sums up my thoughts very neatly and articulately ....


As an active Democrat who has remained, thus far, undecided, her performance here [in front of the Benghazi committee] and at the debate have gone a long way toward convincing me to support Clinton instead of Sanders; even though, politically, my ideals line up more closely with Sanders' democratic socialism than Clinton's quasi-third way centrism.

If a Democrat wins the 2016 election, her or his main job as I see it will be defending the achievements of the Obama adminsitration, which will surely be under even more sustained attack once he leaves office. Any major expansion to that legacy will need to be incremental given a hostile, partisan Congress that, at least in the House, is pretty much "locked in" by gerrymandering until the next redistricting cycle.

In that light, I'm increasingly leaning toward Hillary, not so much based on what she believes but on her competence, both as a public official and as a politician who knows how to punch back.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/i-think-we-ll-see-more-of-this

Vikingwoman



Old Hil is bad to the bone! She played those dimwits like a fine violin.

2seaoat



Bernie has been reviving up the base, and Hillary will win by a landslide unless Kasich is the nominee and wins Ohio......I think however Clinton has Va and Fl, and I personally know a lot of woman who think its time, and are going to vote when they did not vote for President Obama. Competency. President Obama has shown us a stark contrast with President Bush in that regard that people may not like a candidate, but they want intelligence, tenacity, and experience in government. Kasich is still a very viable candidate who has experience and my kind of traditional Republican cost cutting of the military. He cannot win with the crazies so it is a moot point.

Markle

Markle

Salinsky wrote:I wrote this Wednesday ...

Salinsky wrote:The rationale for Clinton as the nominee is solidifying.

With her strong debate performance and rising poll numbers, Bernie supporters need to come to terms with this fact.

I like Bernie, but his campaign is becoming even more of a huge long shot.

The important thing is keeping a Republican out of the Oval Office.



After yesterday's appearance before the committee, I feel even more strongly that Hillary is the candidate.

This guy sums up my thoughts very neatly and articulately ....


As an active Democrat who has remained, thus far, undecided, her performance here [in front of the Benghazi committee] and at the debate have gone a long way toward convincing me to support Clinton instead of Sanders; even though, politically, my ideals line up more closely with Sanders' democratic socialism than Clinton's quasi-third way centrism.

If a Democrat wins the 2016 election, her or his main job as I see it will be defending the achievements of the Obama adminsitration, which will surely be under even more sustained attack once he leaves office. Any major expansion to that legacy will need to be incremental given a hostile, partisan Congress that, at least in the House, is pretty much "locked in" by gerrymandering until the next redistricting cycle.

In that light, I'm increasingly leaning toward Hillary, not so much based on what she believes but on her competence, both as a public official and as a politician who knows how to punch back.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/i-think-we-ll-see-more-of-this

WOW, I must knell down to honor your overwhelming ability of prognostication!

WHO, other than you could have forecast six months ago that Hillary Clinton would be the Democrat candidate for President?

Meanwhile....
Time to Get Onboard the Hillary Campaign 01814102-1e84-4392-adfd-09991616faca_zpssujf2epg

Guest


Guest

Those "talkingpointmemos" really do think for themselves... it's as if you don't have to think at all. Eh comrade?

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

Salinsky wrote:I wrote this Wednesday ...

Salinsky wrote:The rationale for Clinton as the nominee is solidifying.

With her strong debate performance and rising poll numbers, Bernie supporters need to come to terms with this fact.

I like Bernie, but his campaign is becoming even more of a huge long shot.

The important thing is keeping a Republican out of the Oval Office.



After yesterday's appearance before the committee, I feel even more strongly that Hillary is the candidate.

This guy sums up my thoughts very neatly and articulately ....


As an active Democrat who has remained, thus far, undecided, her performance here [in front of the Benghazi committee] and at the debate have gone a long way toward convincing me to support Clinton instead of Sanders; even though, politically, my ideals line up more closely with Sanders' democratic socialism than Clinton's quasi-third way centrism.

If a Democrat wins the 2016 election, her or his main job as I see it will be defending the achievements of the Obama adminsitration, which will surely be under even more sustained attack once he leaves office. Any major expansion to that legacy will need to be incremental given a hostile, partisan Congress that, at least in the House, is pretty much "locked in" by gerrymandering until the next redistricting cycle.

In that light, I'm increasingly leaning toward Hillary, not so much based on what she believes but on her competence, both as a public official and as a politician who knows how to punch back.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/i-think-we-ll-see-more-of-this

Her performance at the hearing was impressive and made me feel a lot better about what may be her inevitable nomination. Whereas I've said previously I prefer Sanders' take on things it remains to be seen how the primary plays out. I could happily vote for either Bernie or Hillary when I consider who the R's might nominate.

Having the WH and the Congress in Republican hands is more than the middle class could stand. Fortunately the Dems turn out for the Presidential elections. If they'd turn out for the midterms we wouldn't be in such a weak position.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Yes the slaves must approve of their master..I guess Hillary might as well put the sticks in the hands of the cops to beat us with as anyone...Forbid it we should ever value true freedom...when we stop empowering liars and crooks ?

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yes the slaves must approve of their master..I guess Hillary might as well put the sticks in the hands of the cops to beat us with as anyone...Forbid it we should ever value true freedom...when we stop empowering liars and crooks ?

And what exactly is the alternative in the real world, not the one you wish were true? We may as well elect the taliban as have both houses of congress and the WH in the hands of the meat head extremists who are so unreasonable they can't even get along among themselves well enough to accomplish anything.

One of these days the government will work for the benefit of the majority of citizens. Wanting to elect..., well exactly what is your solution?

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

othershoe1030 wrote:
TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yes the slaves must approve of their master..I guess Hillary might as well put the sticks in the hands of the cops to beat us with as anyone...Forbid it we should ever value true freedom...when we stop empowering liars and crooks ?

And what exactly is the alternative in the real world, not the one you wish were true? We may as well elect the taliban as have both houses of congress and the WH in the hands of the meat head extremists who are so unreasonable they can't even get along among themselves well enough to accomplish anything.

One of these days the government will work for the benefit of the majority of citizens. Wanting to elect..., well exactly what is your solution?

No too big to fail or too big to jail. Incarcerate all these criminals in banking and their government enablers. Reduce the number and size of government bureaucracies that exercise authority and law power where they have none endowed them by the constitution . ...

In reality, the government is so huge and godlike and it's subjects, like you love it so much that nothing will really help outside a total revamp and retraining of the slaves that don't know better....

Go ahead and pick your master...don't complain when your children live under a feudal system. Let them die fighting for freedom one of these days...I'm tired.



None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -  Goethe

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

TEOTWAWKI wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yes the slaves must approve of their master..I guess Hillary might as well put the sticks in the hands of the cops to beat us with as anyone...Forbid it we should ever value true freedom...when we stop empowering liars and crooks ?

And what exactly is the alternative in the real world, not the one you wish were true? We may as well elect the taliban as have both houses of congress and the WH in the hands of the meat head extremists who are so unreasonable they can't even get along among themselves well enough to accomplish anything.

One of these days the government will work for the benefit of the majority of citizens. Wanting to elect..., well exactly what is your solution?

No too big to fail or too big to jail. Incarcerate all these criminals in banking and their government enablers. Reduce the number and size of government bureaucracies that exercise authority and law power where they have none endowed them by the constitution . ...

In reality, the government is so huge and godlike and it's subjects, like you love it so much that nothing will really help outside a total revamp and retraining of the slaves that don't know better....

Go ahead and pick your master...don't complain when your children live under a feudal system. Let them die fighting for freedom one of these days...I'm tired.



None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -  Goethe

The government is too big in all the wrong places. We need government to curb corporations and the financial sector. There is no other entity strong enough to do that. Who are you going to elect to accomplish the goals you set out? The congress is owned by the corporations.

You say I love the government. I would love to have a government that I Could love not one run as a front for corporate interests. How are you going to pass laws that will jail the Wall Street crooks when they are running things?

A strong dose of reality is needed. It takes more than renaming the tea baggers, tea party people to Freedom Caucus to get real things done. They are so crazy they vote no on bills they co-sponsor just so the current administration doesn't get what it wants, even when they too want it. how nuts is that?

Who do you favor in the 2016 election?

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

othershoe1030 wrote:
TEOTWAWKI wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yes the slaves must approve of their master..I guess Hillary might as well put the sticks in the hands of the cops to beat us with as anyone...Forbid it we should ever value true freedom...when we stop empowering liars and crooks ?

And what exactly is the alternative in the real world, not the one you wish were true? We may as well elect the taliban as have both houses of congress and the WH in the hands of the meat head extremists who are so unreasonable they can't even get along among themselves well enough to accomplish anything.

One of these days the government will work for the benefit of the majority of citizens. Wanting to elect..., well exactly what is your solution?

No too big to fail or too big to jail. Incarcerate all these criminals in banking and their government enablers. Reduce the number and size of government bureaucracies that exercise authority and law power where they have none endowed them by the constitution . ...

In reality, the government is so huge and godlike and it's subjects, like you love it so much that nothing will really help outside a total revamp and retraining of the slaves that don't know better....

Go ahead and pick your master...don't complain when your children live under a feudal system. Let them die fighting for freedom one of these days...I'm tired.



None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -  Goethe

The government is too big in all the wrong places. We need government to curb corporations and the financial sector. There is no other entity strong enough to do that. Who are you going to elect to accomplish the goals you set out? The congress is owned by the corporations.

You say I love the government. I would love to have a government that I Could love not one run as a front for corporate interests. How are you going to pass laws that will jail the Wall Street crooks when they are running things?

A strong dose of reality is needed. It takes more than renaming the tea baggers, tea party people to Freedom Caucus to get real things done. They are so crazy they vote no on bills they co-sponsor just so the current administration doesn't get what it wants, even when they too want it. how nuts is that?

Who do you favor in the 2016 election?

No one...I hope for grid lock. I hope for war among the government departments...I hope to economically starve the beast....hopefully before it takes us all with it.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'm for Trump and Hillary and frankly don't care which one wins.
I just want to see that election campaign.  They'll be talking about that one for the next hundred years.  lol

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

No one...I hope for grid lock. I hope for war among the government departments...I hope to economically starve the beast....hopefully before it takes us all with it.


That's the lazy way out. We've seen gridlock for years now and it accomplishes nothing positive. If you want to live in a third world country then this is the way to go.

Real reform takes time and effort. It takes citizens getting up off the couch and participating in their communities and country, at least elect people who want to make things better instead of just being roadblocks.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Why would I want to get on board a campaign that's trying to label Bernie Sanders a sexist?

Sal

Sal

She's pulling away in Iowa ...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-iowa-caucus-october

Sal

Sal

Bob wrote:Why would I want to get on board a campaign that's trying to label Bernie Sanders a sexist?

It was a funny line, because Bernie shouts all of the time.

Women are going to come out in droves to vote for her.

Markle

Markle

Salinsky wrote:
Bob wrote:Why would I want to get on board a campaign that's trying to label Bernie Sanders a sexist?

It was a funny line, because Bernie shouts all of the time.

Women are going to come out in droves to vote for her.

You just relish in being wrong, don't you?

Hillary Clinton is losing ground with white women voters, a new poll shows, marking a potentially damaging development with a demographic important to her and which President Barack Obama fared poorly with in the 2012 election.

The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC Poll, conducted July 26-30 of 1,000 adults, showed that among white women with at least a college degree, the group sharing the most similarities with Clinton, the former secretary of state's numbers had turned negative, with 47 percent holding an unfavorable view of her and 43 percent showing a positive view.

In comparison, in June, the same demographic showed 51 percent with a positive view and 38 percent negative, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hillary-clinton-white-women-poll-unfavorable/2015/08/04/id/665351/#ixzz3ppVpXm6g

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum