Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Things that Clinton should answer to in hearings

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

1) When Ambassador Stevens asked for more security when there was a valid reason to do so, why did Hillary not provide it? Anything in this government can get done if there is a valid need and there was a valid need.


2) Who stood down the military and other operators in the region from making a response on the attacks at Benghazi? Aside from Marines at Sigonella (Fast Reaction Team), many other forces were in that region and had CV-22/MH-47 and other SOF support that could have resulted in an exfil of the ambassador and his team if given the OK to do so.


3) Why did the WH LIE (video) about the causes of Benghazi and play down the terrorism aspect two months before the election? Was it because Obozo said "Al Qeada was on the run?"


https://www.yahoo.com/politics/clinton-vs-trey-gowdy-in-benghazi-showdown-075933601.html

Sal

Sal

Things that Clinton should answer to in hearings Screen27

Things that Clinton should answer to in hearings Screen19

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi%20Report.pdf

nadalfan



If you guys obsessing over Hillary and the Benghazi scandal have any integrity and concern for the truth, you'll read this entire article

http://www.newsweek.com/benghazi-biopsy-comprehensive-guide-one-americas-worst-political-outrages-385853

Guest


Guest

None of the previous committees had all of the information... we likely still don't.

The equivalent would be buying a car on craigslist without ever testing it in person.

This passes for transparency and a responsive govt to useful idiots... but not to those w critical thinking skills.

Guest


Guest

PkrBum wrote:None of the previous committees had all of the information... we likely still don't.

The equivalent would be buying a car on craigslist without ever testing it in person.

This passes for transparency and a responsive govt to useful idiots... but not to those w critical thinking skills.

Exactly. Hillary has obstructed justice from the start and we still have tons of emails to sift through yet. It's coming to light more than just personal emails were dumped. She needs to burn like a leaf pile. If Petraeus was guilty of improper handling of classified documents, Hillary should be a slam dunk to get hosed as well.

Markle

Markle

Salinsky wrote:Things that Clinton should answer to in hearings Screen27

Things that Clinton should answer to in hearings Screen19

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi%20Report.pdf

As you should know, that report is from three years ago which was even before we learned that Hillary Clinton had a private email server in her basement. Since then we have had TENS OF THOUSANDS of emails come out with over 1,300 emails we just learned of this week from J. Christopher Stephens.

Had the White House, and the State Department NOT stonewalled this investigation, it would have been concluded years ago.

Do you think Hillary can break Bill's record for saying "I don't recall, I don't remember that, etc., etc., etc.".

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum