PkrBum wrote:Wordslinger wrote:PkrBum wrote:Take a careful look again at the description and direct quotes I listed above. Now tell me you truly wish that for us.
It beats hell out of a system where 1% controls more than 50% now, and intends to control everything. What's strange, is that the system as it stands right now victimizes you as much as everyone else -- yet you can't wait to put your flabby body on the front line in their defense. ...
First... I'm not and have never been flabby... not even close. Second... please take a few minutes to really read the post.
I can't imagine that is what you truly believe and would support. Be honest.
From your definition: "
For example,Peter Hain classifies democratic socialism,along with libertarian socialism,as a form of anti-authoritarian "socialism from below" (using the term popularised by Hal Draper),in contrast to Stalinism and social democracy,variants of authoritarian state socialism. For Hain,this democratic/authoritarian divide is more important than the revolutionary/reformist divide. [8] In this type of democratic socialism,it is the active participation of the population as a whole,and workers in particular,in the management of economy that characterises democratic socialism,while nationalisation and economic planning (whether controlled by an elected government or not) are characteristic of state socialism. A similar,but more complex,argument is made by Nicos Poulantzas. [9]
Sounds fine to me!! If America would become as happy, peaceful, and productive as Sweden, Norway or Denmark, I'd truly be delighted. The type of capitalism that is now destroying life here, sucks.