Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Bergdahl

+6
2seaoat
Floridatexan
gatorfan
polecat
Markle
Vikingwoman
10 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 3]

26Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 7:07 am

Guest


Guest

Senior leadership means "generals"

27Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 7:19 am

Guest


Guest

http://www.westernjournalism.com/the-army-has-charged-bowe-bergdahl-with-something-even-worse-than-desertion/

Desertion and misbehavior before the enemy... I say he still needs to die for his crimes against his fellow soldiers
... Ya know lke the six men who died looking for his sorry azz after he ran off like a little beotch

28Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 8:25 am

Sal

Sal

Look, there were all kinds of warning signs that this guy wasn't fit to serve, but I guess if they'll take a mental defective like PeeDawg, they'll take damn near anyone.

So, it's on the Army for sending him over there, and yeah, we were obligated to being him home, even if we had to exchange five goat-fuckers to get him.

29Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 8:53 am

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Salinsky wrote:Look, there were all kinds of warning signs that this guy wasn't fit to serve, but I guess if they'll take a mental defective like PeeDawg, they'll take damn near anyone.

So, it's on the Army for sending him over there, and yeah, we were obligated to being him home, even if we had to exchange five goat-fuckers to get him.

His trial is next week. No one here can prove he deserted. He's a scapegoat who spent 5 years as a POW. He apparently witnessed the wanton murder of a child, reported it, and got nowhere. There is also no proof that those soldiers died looking for him.

30Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 9:36 am

polecat

polecat

PkrBum wrote:
polecat wrote:Go look up definition of Uncle Tom.
Trump liberated me no more time to be PC

WALL  

Labeling a black man an uncle tom because you disagree with his politics is despicable and designates you as a racist.

An asshole racist at that.

Yes I am a asshole and a racist, can you admit that you are a dick and a racist?

31Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 10:33 am

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

to War Hero: You and Bergdahl have a great deal in common -- both of your are victims of a war the United States mistakenly chose to wage ... and lose ... and is still losing ... in Afghanistan. A war the U.S.A. was never committed to winning or concluding. We're still there losing troops for no good reason whatever. The Afghan people, like the Iraqi people hate our guts for the awful damage we've done to them in the name of American imperialism. Whether Bergdahl deserted or defected isn't the real issue. Obviously you are too stupid to realize how you've been used and exploited. You're no better than one of those teenaged dolts who parades up and down Highway 90 parading a rebel flaq from his pickup. You need desperately to recognize that being a loyal warrior for a country that's trying to oppress and rule foreign countries via military power, doesn't get you recognition, admiration, or self-worth. Reality.

32Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 11:04 am

Vikingwoman



Obamasucks wrote:Here's some brief info-


In this photo reviewed by the military, an American flag waves within the razor wire-lined compound of Camp Delta prison, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba, June 27, 2006. The five former detainees exchanged for Bowe Bergdahl are now in Qatar. Reuters
Since they were swapped for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl last year, five former Taliban commanders are now living in quarters quite unlike their Guantanamo Bay jail cells. The leaders, known as the Taliban Five or the Guantanamo Five, are getting “royal treatment” in Qatar, the Persian Gulf state where they were sent following the swap, according to Newsweek.

Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Muhammad Nabi, Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa and Abdul Haq Wasiq were mid- to high-ranking Taliban officials who were captured by U.S. forces in the early days of the war in Afghanistan, according to CNN. Critics of the Bergdahl swap said the men are dangerous and will eventually return to attack the U.S. once their year of surveillance in Qatar is up. One intelligence agency said one of the men contacted the Taliban after his release, according to the network. More far-fetched rumors -- that three of the former detainees were now commanders with the Islamic State group -- were given a “Pants on Fire” rating by the fact-checking site Politifact.

But the five men are enjoying cushy conditions in Qatar, Newsweek reported. None of the five are from the wealthy Gulf nation and they are feeling “homesick,” according to the publication. Their handlers have accommodated them by allowing them to each bring five other Taliban families to help them in Doha, the capital of Qatar where the men are staying. About 35 Taliban households with connections to the Guantanamo Five are in Doha, according to Newsweek.


Some of the former detainees aren’t content. At least two of them want to return to fight in Afghanistan. Some current commanders fear a leadership struggle should the men eventually return.

Fazl, who is either 46 or 47 years old, was identified as the Taliban deputy minister of defense during the war in Afghanistan, NPR reported. Noori, around the same age, was a senior military commander in Mazar-e-Sharif, a strategic city in the north of Afghanistan. Nabi, either 45 or 46 years old, was a “senior Taliban official in multiple leadership roles.” Khairkhwa, either 46 or 47 years old, was the minister of interior, governor of Herat and a military commander. Wasiq, either 42 or 43 years old, was the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence.

What part of they had to release them anyway do you not understand?

33Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 12:55 pm

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Vikingwoman wrote:
Obamasucks wrote:Here's some brief info-


In this photo reviewed by the military, an American flag waves within the razor wire-lined compound of Camp Delta prison, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba, June 27, 2006. The five former detainees exchanged for Bowe Bergdahl are now in Qatar. Reuters
Since they were swapped for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl last year, five former Taliban commanders are now living in quarters quite unlike their Guantanamo Bay jail cells. The leaders, known as the Taliban Five or the Guantanamo Five, are getting “royal treatment” in Qatar, the Persian Gulf state where they were sent following the swap, according to Newsweek.

Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Muhammad Nabi, Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa and Abdul Haq Wasiq were mid- to high-ranking Taliban officials who were captured by U.S. forces in the early days of the war in Afghanistan, according to CNN. Critics of the Bergdahl swap said the men are dangerous and will eventually return to attack the U.S. once their year of surveillance in Qatar is up. One intelligence agency said one of the men contacted the Taliban after his release, according to the network. More far-fetched rumors -- that three of the former detainees were now commanders with the Islamic State group -- were given a “Pants on Fire” rating by the fact-checking site Politifact.

But the five men are enjoying cushy conditions in Qatar, Newsweek reported. None of the five are from the wealthy Gulf nation and they are feeling “homesick,” according to the publication. Their handlers have accommodated them by allowing them to each bring five other Taliban families to help them in Doha, the capital of Qatar where the men are staying. About 35 Taliban households with connections to the Guantanamo Five are in Doha, according to Newsweek.


Some of the former detainees aren’t content. At least two of them want to return to fight in Afghanistan. Some current commanders fear a leadership struggle should the men eventually return.

Fazl, who is either 46 or 47 years old, was identified as the Taliban deputy minister of defense during the war in Afghanistan, NPR reported. Noori, around the same age, was a senior military commander in Mazar-e-Sharif, a strategic city in the north of Afghanistan. Nabi, either 45 or 46 years old, was a “senior Taliban official in multiple leadership roles.” Khairkhwa, either 46 or 47 years old, was the minister of interior, governor of Herat and a military commander. Wasiq, either 42 or 43 years old, was the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence.

What part of they had to release them anyway do you not understand?

War Hero is incapable of logical thought. He still thinks it's okay to toss Iraqi prisoners from helicopters. The facts are, the 5 Muslims released for Bergdahl hate our guts for very good reason -- in their viewpoint. War Hero never asks the right questions ...

34Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 4:26 pm

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Vikingwoman wrote:
Obamasucks wrote:Here's some brief info-


In this photo reviewed by the military, an American flag waves within the razor wire-lined compound of Camp Delta prison, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba, June 27, 2006. The five former detainees exchanged for Bowe Bergdahl are now in Qatar. Reuters
Since they were swapped for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl last year, five former Taliban commanders are now living in quarters quite unlike their Guantanamo Bay jail cells. The leaders, known as the Taliban Five or the Guantanamo Five, are getting “royal treatment” in Qatar, the Persian Gulf state where they were sent following the swap, according to Newsweek.

Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Muhammad Nabi, Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa and Abdul Haq Wasiq were mid- to high-ranking Taliban officials who were captured by U.S. forces in the early days of the war in Afghanistan, according to CNN. Critics of the Bergdahl swap said the men are dangerous and will eventually return to attack the U.S. once their year of surveillance in Qatar is up. One intelligence agency said one of the men contacted the Taliban after his release, according to the network. More far-fetched rumors -- that three of the former detainees were now commanders with the Islamic State group -- were given a “Pants on Fire” rating by the fact-checking site Politifact.

But the five men are enjoying cushy conditions in Qatar, Newsweek reported. None of the five are from the wealthy Gulf nation and they are feeling “homesick,” according to the publication. Their handlers have accommodated them by allowing them to each bring five other Taliban families to help them in Doha, the capital of Qatar where the men are staying. About 35 Taliban households with connections to the Guantanamo Five are in Doha, according to Newsweek.


Some of the former detainees aren’t content. At least two of them want to return to fight in Afghanistan. Some current commanders fear a leadership struggle should the men eventually return.

Fazl, who is either 46 or 47 years old, was identified as the Taliban deputy minister of defense during the war in Afghanistan, NPR reported. Noori, around the same age, was a senior military commander in Mazar-e-Sharif, a strategic city in the north of Afghanistan. Nabi, either 45 or 46 years old, was a “senior Taliban official in multiple leadership roles.” Khairkhwa, either 46 or 47 years old, was the minister of interior, governor of Herat and a military commander. Wasiq, either 42 or 43 years old, was the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence.

What part of they had to release them anyway do you not understand?

War Hero is incapable of logical thought.  He still thinks it's okay to toss Iraqi prisoners from helicopters.  The facts are, the 5 Muslims released for Bergdahl hate our guts for very good reason -- in their viewpoint.  War Hero never asks the right questions ...

They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda. They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO. How is this hard for you to understand?

35Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 4:40 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda.  They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO.  How is this hard for you to understand?

Wrong. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, but was never part of the organization.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

36Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 5:12 pm

Sal

Sal

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda.  They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO.  How is this hard for you to understand?

Wrong. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, but was never part of the organization.

Cut Ol' Man Markle some slack.

He's confused again.

But, he knows it wasn't over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.

37Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/10/2015, 5:34 pm

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda.  They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO.  How is this hard for you to understand?

Wrong. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, but was never part of the organization.

WOW, so they are the top leadership of the Taliban.... Yeah, I can see how that it makes a major difference in who sets you on fire in a cage.

38Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/11/2015, 4:08 pm

Markle

Markle

Salinsky wrote:Look, there were all kinds of warning signs that this guy wasn't fit to serve, but I guess if they'll take a mental defective like PeeDawg, they'll take damn near anyone.

So, it's on the Army for sending him over there, and yeah, we were obligated to being him home, even if we had to exchange five goat-fuckers to get him.

As is your wont, your skills are limited to denigrating anyone.

I don't care what they did in their bedrooms, as you seem to find weirdly interesting.

They are five, hand picked by al Qaeda/Taliban, terrorist leaders.

Why did semi-retired President Obama negotiated for the release of the four or five INNOCENT hostages held in the terrorist nation of Iran?

39Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 8:33 pm

Guest


Guest

Here Vikingwench - this guy lost his leg looking for the traitor Bergdahl. People did die looking for the scum.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/253478-ex-navy-seal-bergdahl-must-be-held-accountable

40Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 8:51 pm

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Obamasucks wrote:Here Vikingwench - this guy lost his leg looking for the traitor Bergdahl. People did die looking for the scum.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/253478-ex-navy-seal-bergdahl-must-be-held-accountable

NO...this soldier lost his leg because of George W Bush. If he had any sense, he would blame the people who are really responsible for his injury on the battlefield.

41Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 9:43 pm

Vikingwoman



Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda.  They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO.  How is this hard for you to understand?

Wrong. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, but was never part of the organization.

WOW, so they are the top leadership of the Taliban....  Yeah, I can see how that it makes a major difference in who sets you on fire in a cage.


Moron Markle:

They were detained early in the war due to their positions. They were not charged w/ any crimes by the US. We had to release them eventually. Got it?

42Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 10:12 pm

Guest


Guest

by Obamasucks Today at 2:33 am
Here Vikingwench - this guy lost his leg looking for the traitor Bergdahl. People did die looking for the scum.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/253478-ex-navy-seal-bergdahl-must-be-held-accountable
by Floridatexan Today at 2:51 am
Obamasucks wrote:

Here Vikingwench - this guy lost his leg looking for the traitor Bergdahl. People did die looking for the scum.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/253478-ex-navy-seal-bergdahl-must-be-held-accountable

NO...this soldier lost his leg because of George W Bush. If he had any sense, he would blame the people who are really responsible for his injury on the battlefield.
----
Wrong answer- Bush didnt desert his post, Bergdahl did . You are one moronic creature.

43Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 11:04 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Obamasucks wrote:Wrong answer- Bush didnt desert his post, Bergdahl did . You are one moronic creature.

No, he just went AWOL from the TANG between 1972 and 1973...

Bergdahl - Page 2 Awol10

Bergdahl - Page 2 Bumper10

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

44Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/12/2015, 11:17 pm

Guest


Guest

It's always Bush's fault. LOL

45Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 6:20 pm

Markle

Markle

Vikingwoman wrote:
Obamasucks wrote:Here's some brief info-


In this photo reviewed by the military, an American flag waves within the razor wire-lined compound of Camp Delta prison, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba, June 27, 2006. The five former detainees exchanged for Bowe Bergdahl are now in Qatar. Reuters
Since they were swapped for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl last year, five former Taliban commanders are now living in quarters quite unlike their Guantanamo Bay jail cells. The leaders, known as the Taliban Five or the Guantanamo Five, are getting “royal treatment” in Qatar, the Persian Gulf state where they were sent following the swap, according to Newsweek.

What part of they had to release them anyway do you not understand?

What part of WHY, do you not understand?

46Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 6:43 pm

Guest


Guest

He went to the enemy willingly... of his own volition... upon his choice. What business is it of ours to interfere.

47Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 8:43 pm

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

PkrBum wrote:He went to the enemy willingly... of his own volition... upon his choice. What business is it of ours to interfere.


cheers

48Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 8:46 pm

Guest


Guest

Vikingwoman wrote:

What part of they had to release them anyway do you not understand?

Nah, they didn't have to release them. It was Obama's decision to bargain away five generals for one private. Asinine, but that's been the legacy of his two terms of office...

49Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 8:47 pm

Markle

Markle

Vikingwoman wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Markle wrote:They are the top leadership of Al Qaeda.  They had been killing us before they were taken off the battlefield and comfortably housed at GITMO.  How is this hard for you to understand?

Wrong. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, but was never part of the organization.

WOW, so they are the top leadership of the Taliban....  Yeah, I can see how that it makes a major difference in who sets you on fire in a cage.


Moron Markle:

They were detained early in the war due to their positions. They were not charged w/ any crimes by the US. We had to release them eventually. Got it?

It's always fun when the Progressives lose their grasp and are reduced to kindergarten tactics of name calling.

So they were detained early in the war due to their positions. Commanding terrorists against us captured on the field of battle and taken prisoners. They are not in the United States and to charge and try them could disclose secrets which could cost many lives.

And no, we did NOT have to release them eventually. Someone eager to cost American their lives and score points with our enemies WOULD "have" to release them.

Why are you eager to have more Americans killed by ISIS and other terrorists?

Please be specific, I really am interested.

50Bergdahl - Page 2 Empty Re: Bergdahl 9/13/2015, 8:48 pm

Guest


Guest

We should have capped all five of them and tossed them into a poppy field.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum