Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Whack job DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz tries desperately to shield Hillary Clinton from any and all debates...why?

Whack job DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz tries desperately to shield Hillary Clinton from any and all debates...why?

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

Whack job DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz tries desperately to shield Hillary Clinton from any and all debates...why?

What began as a routine forum of candidate speeches evolved into a surprisingly dramatic day at the Democratic National Committee’s summer meeting, as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley issued thinly veiled attacks on Clinton and the party leadership.

Speaking from the dais, with DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz sitting a few feet away, O’Malley blasted the party’s limited number of sanctioned debates as a process “rigged” in favor of the front-runner. The DNC is holding six debates, only four before February’s first caucuses in Iowa, which O’Malley argued is a disadvantage for all the candidates and a disservice to Democrats generally.

“This sort of rigged process has never been attempted before,” said O’Malley, who has struggled to gain traction in the polls. He added: “We are the Democratic Party, not the undemocratic party.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-challengers-launch-attacks-against-clinton-party-leadership/2015/08/28/722bc1c6-4d9b-11e5-84df-923b3ef1a64b_story.html

Guest


Guest

It appears they've actually reinstated a few. I'm sure they'd rather run it like a n.korean election.

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

Jewish American Princess Debbie Wasserman was co-chair of Hillary's campaign in 08 .....

2seaoat



The funny thing is that the Republicans pulled back the number of debates because intelligent tacticians realize that the public is looking at these debates as a series of clown car events. Lincoln and Douglas would debate for hours. Ten people on the stage trying to say outlandish things in three minutes to get attention is desperation and it hurt the Republican party in 2012, so why would any party want more face time for fringe candidates which hurt the respective parties?

It seems like the boyz here are threatened by strong women....oh my.....I can guess how things are working in their personal lives.

Markle

Markle

Fox's GOP debate had record 24 MILLION VIEWERS

http://money.cnn.com/2015/08/07/media/gop-debate-fox-news-ratings/index.html

Sal

Sal

Markle wrote:Fox's GOP debate had record 24 MILLION VIEWERS

http://money.cnn.com/2015/08/07/media/gop-debate-fox-news-ratings/index.html

Who doesn't like a midget fight?

2seaoat



America sadly likes to see people stumble and make fools of themselves. It is tremendously difficult to run a political campaign. Each and every one of these individuals are displaying courage to get up their and give it a try. However, the way this is designed is to guarantee that the debate is NOT about substantive issues facing America. Too many people, and not enough time to develop substantive debates which actually help shape a platform for getting constructive things accomplished in America. Fox and the Republican Party does NOT want to talk about substantive issues of governance. Rather, they want ratings for their steady diet of propaganda which keeps the oligarchy and special interests in control of our congress.

Civic duty has very little to do with ratings. Good governance has very little to do with ratings. Good government is hard work. We have become a slothful people too lazy for intellectual integrity and the hard work necessary for electing independent candidates who work for the American public, and not the highest bidder. In the end it boils down to morality. Good over Evil.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:America sadly likes to see people stumble and make fools of themselves.  It is tremendously difficult to run a political campaign.  Each and every one of these individuals are displaying courage to get up their and give it a try.  However, the way this is designed is to guarantee that the debate is NOT about substantive issues facing America.  Too many people, and not enough time to develop substantive debates which actually help shape a platform for getting constructive things accomplished in America.   Fox and the Republican Party does NOT want to talk about substantive issues of governance.   Rather, they want ratings for their steady diet of propaganda which keeps the oligarchy and special interests in control of our congress.

Civic duty has very little to do with ratings.   Good governance has very little to do with ratings.  Good government is hard work.  We have become a slothful people too lazy for intellectual integrity and the hard work necessary for electing independent candidates who work for the American public, and not the highest bidder.  In the end it boils down to morality.  Good over Evil.

All your word salad again without even a decent dressing.

Carly Fiorina certainly hit it out of the ball park did she not?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Whack job DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz tries desperately to shield Hillary Clinton from any and all debates...why?

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum