Floridatexan wrote:PkrBum wrote:What she also won't do is apply that same standard to hillary. Hillary represented that she was broke upon leaving the wh to garner populist support. When in fact she is a rich bitch preying on the average folk by promising to confiscate the wealth of others... which she won't do because she is bought and paid for by corps, banks, wall st., and foreign interests. She also leveraged her husbands name and accomplishments to place herself among the ruling elite. It's good to be the queen.
I'm back...and you really don't know what you're talking about, as usual. Why don't you start your own Hillary-bashing thread? This one's about "the Donald." I don't doubt that the Clintons' finances were severely impacted by the multiple lawyers they had to hire throughout Bill's presidency. The Clinton Foundation came much later, and Chelsea Clinton has been a prime mover in that.
Hillary Clinton is not my first choice, but, hands down, she beats any Republican running...that's ANY REPUBLICAN. They're all singing the same song, and it's repulsive.
You constantly throw bush2 crap into any thread that criticizes obama, hillary... or any of your dear leaders.
Mine was in actual context because it pointed out the fact that you hold different standards depending on party.