http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/02/12/scott-walker-dodged-a-question-on-evolution-that-was-dumb-but-not-for-the-reason-you-think/
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Go to page : 1, 2
PkrBum wrote:It would be nice if you leftist idiots would vette your own politicians a tiny fraction of the interest you show pubs.
gatorfan wrote:WGAS?
I can recall many liberal hypocrites pouncing on anyone suggesting Obama is a Muslim. WGAS if he is or isn't?
If Walker decided not to answer a question designed to veer away from the issues he was there to talk about - who cares?
If he chooses to believe in creationism or evolution - who cares?
A persons ability to run the country doesn't hinge on religious beliefs.
But you progressive attack dogs would love to think so. Of course when your voter base is composed of hypocrites and bigots what can one expect?
Laughable.
gatorfan wrote:WGAS?
I can recall many liberal hypocrites pouncing on anyone suggesting Obama is a Muslim. WGAS if he is or isn't?
If Walker decided not to answer a question designed to veer away from the issues he was there to talk about - who cares?
If he chooses to believe in creationism or evolution - who cares?
A persons ability to run the country doesn't hinge on religious beliefs.
But you progressive attack dogs would love to think so. Of course when your voter base is composed of hypocrites and bigots what can one expect?
Laughable.
boards of FL wrote:gatorfan wrote:WGAS?
I can recall many liberal hypocrites pouncing on anyone suggesting Obama is a Muslim. WGAS if he is or isn't?
If Walker decided not to answer a question designed to veer away from the issues he was there to talk about - who cares?
If he chooses to believe in creationism or evolution - who cares?
A persons ability to run the country doesn't hinge on religious beliefs.
But you progressive attack dogs would love to think so. Of course when your voter base is composed of hypocrites and bigots what can one expect?
Laughable.
One doesn't "choose" to believe in evolution any more than one "chooses" to believe that water exists, or that the earth is round, or that our moon is not the center of the universe.
If someone can't simply say "Yes" to the question "Do you believe in evolution", you have to question their judgement. Objective facts are something that we should all agree on.
People who deny scientific reality shouldn't be in positions that guide humanity and public policy. If you need a navigator and one candidate shows up with a worn out map that consists of a picture of a turtle with civilization on its back, and then another guy shows up with a GPS, who will you hire?
Damaged Eagle wrote:Of course evolution occurs. So does devolution... The latter is the only way to explain how liberals came into existence.
boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:Of course evolution occurs. So does devolution... The latter is the only way to explain how liberals came into existence.
I wonder if you even realize that you're making this comment within a thread about a conservative politician who refused to acknowledge a well established scientific fact.
The irony is so think that one could cut it with a bowling ball.
gatorfan wrote:WGAS?
I can recall many liberal hypocrites pouncing on anyone suggesting Obama is a Muslim. WGAS if he is or isn't?
If Walker decided not to answer a question designed to veer away from the issues he was there to talk about - who cares?
If he chooses to believe in creationism or evolution - who cares?
A persons ability to run the country doesn't hinge on religious beliefs.
But you progressive attack dogs would love to think so. Of course when your voter base is composed of hypocrites and bigots what can one expect?
Laughable.
boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:Of course evolution occurs. So does devolution... The latter is the only way to explain how liberals came into existence.
I wonder if you even realize that you're making this comment within a thread about a conservative politician who refused to acknowledge a well established scientific fact.
The irony is so think that one could cut it with a bowling ball.
PkrBum wrote:It would be nice if you leftist idiots would vette your own politicians a tiny fraction of the interest you show pubs.
Wordslinger wrote:boards of FL wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:Of course evolution occurs. So does devolution... The latter is the only way to explain how liberals came into existence.
I wonder if you even realize that you're making this comment within a thread about a conservative politician who refused to acknowledge a well established scientific fact.
The irony is so think that one could cut it with a bowling ball.
You guys can continue to dick around with Damaged Eagle, but I'm through with him. It's not debate, it's playing with insanity.
ppaca wrote:I didn't read any except the last post. As some of you can gather I despise every politician that walks the face of the earth, they are all whore's, take for them self and make sweet heart deals with big biz, regardless of party. That being said if you all are electing a president that dodges a question of evolution no wonder this world is so fucked up.
PkrBum wrote:I would take a koch candidate any day over a soros candidate... like your dear leader obama.
Go to page : 1, 2
Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Scott Walker - Wisconsin Governor and potential 2016 Republican candidate for president - dodges a question on evolution.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum