No one was beating On Bristol Palin when she socked the owner of the house.You can take the trash out of the house but you can't take the trash out of the trash.
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The funny thing is, there are posters on this forum who would be delighted to see Sarah Palin on the GOP ticket for President. They seriously feel she is a contender.
Personally, I think she is has the intellect of a bag of sand, and Todd just wouldn't cut it as First Man.
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The funny thing is, there are posters on this forum who would be delighted to see Sarah Palin on the GOP ticket for President. They seriously feel she is a contender.
Personally, I think she is has the intellect of a bag of sand, and Todd just wouldn't cut it as First Man.
Vikingwoman wrote:ZVUGKTUBM wrote:The funny thing is, there are posters on this forum who would be delighted to see Sarah Palin on the GOP ticket for President. They seriously feel she is a contender.
Personally, I think she is has the intellect of a bag of sand, and Todd just wouldn't cut it as First Man.
I think anyone of any significant intelligence knows Sarah Palin does not have the capacity in any form to be the President. She would never be taken seriously as a candidate nor would she be endorsed by any party. She is the least of any political worries.
Floridatexan wrote:
1) She's stupid.
2) She's incoherent.
3) She's stupid.
4) There are people stupid enough to vote for her.
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
1) She's stupid.
2) She's incoherent.
3) She's stupid.
4) There are people stupid enough to vote for her.
As there were the same ilk voting for Oblamer.
Th Dude wrote:
The really sad part is that she actually had much more executive experience than obama did.
Sal wrote:Th Dude wrote:
The really sad part is that she actually had much more executive experience than obama did.
Thank you for exploding the myth that executive experience is the most important qualification for holding elected office.
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Palin lost all credibility when she quit her governor's job after serving 0.65 of just one term, in order to chase after money. She was not in office long enough to establish any sort of record, and she lusted after greed instead of proving substance.
She is not worth a shit, and this becomes more evident as time travels by. How wingnuts can continue to be attracted to her politically escapes all logic.
Th Dude wrote:Sal wrote:Th Dude wrote:
The really sad part is that she actually had much more executive experience than obama did.
Thank you for exploding the myth that executive experience is the most important qualification for holding elected office.
What myth? Are you unable to admit the simple truth that experience and a record are important factors for important jobs?
Last edited by Sal on 9/16/2014, 2:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Vikingwoman wrote:Palin was not emotionally stable and could never have held the office of the Presidency. She is vindictive and narcissistic. After watching interviews of Steve Schmidt, McCain's campaign manager, it was clear this country dodged a bullet by their election loss.
Th Dude wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Palin was not emotionally stable and could never have held the office of the Presidency. She is vindictive and narcissistic. After watching interviews of Steve Schmidt, McCain's campaign manager, it was clear this country dodged a bullet by their election loss.
That first line works very well with hillary as the lead word.
Floridatexan wrote:Th Dude wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Palin was not emotionally stable and could never have held the office of the Presidency. She is vindictive and narcissistic. After watching interviews of Steve Schmidt, McCain's campaign manager, it was clear this country dodged a bullet by their election loss.
That first line works very well with hillary as the lead word.
Hillary's not stupid.
Th Dude wrote:I wonder if dogs think cats are smart?
That's the funny thing about intelligence... you can't really appreciate it or quantify it or recognize it unless you have it.
If you don't then it's really just a leap of faith to assign it to someone... usually upon their recommendation.
Th Dude wrote:Yes... after swearing to never vote r or d again for president in 2002. I simply couldn't believe obama had the experience to lead the free world... by 2012 the rest of you should've figured that out. I can appreciate that there wasn't really a viable option in your party... and that romney was no better... but to vote again with glee was telling. I was pretty sure nothing mattered but power to the left... but that cinched it. Yea team..!!
Vikingwoman wrote:Th Dude wrote:Yes... after swearing to never vote r or d again for president in 2002. I simply couldn't believe obama had the experience to lead the free world... by 2012 the rest of you should've figured that out. I can appreciate that there wasn't really a viable option in your party... and that romney was no better... but to vote again with glee was telling. I was pretty sure nothing mattered but power to the left... but that cinched it. Yea team..!!
Apparently, we recognized the intelligence in Obama and weren't swayed by trivial matters like who's in power. Some people vote for the good of the country and issues that affect them.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|