Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

+2
knothead
Markle
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?

Guest


Guest

Burn the rest of their community to ashes? NY is protesting the strangulation death of a young man... peacefully.

knothead

knothead

Markle wrote:What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?


Perhaps a more relevant question would be: What happens if there is no special persecutor appointed to deal with the issue? The community needs to have confidence in the process and this would go a long way toward resolving any fears that the local authority(s) would sweep it under the rug. If it is deemed to be fair, open and transparent then the likelihood of a peaceful resolution is enhanced. If not, it would be a thumb in the eye of the community and suspicion will again come to the forefront and it is just not necessary.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

knothead wrote:
Markle wrote:What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?


Perhaps a more relevant question would be: What happens if there is no special persecutor appointed to deal with the issue? The community needs to have confidence in the process and this would go a long way toward resolving any fears that the local authority(s) would sweep it under the rug. If it is deemed to be fair, open and transparent then the likelihood of a peaceful resolution is enhanced. If not, it would be a thumb in the eye of the community and suspicion will again come to the forefront and it is just not necessary.  

What if the victim was a white 17 year old that robbed a store, mouthed-off at a cop, assaulted the cop, tried to grab his gun and then got shot and died?  Would we even be here?  Absolutely not.



http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/black-cop-killed-innocent-white-man-utah-press-silent/

knothead

knothead

Joanimaroni wrote:
knothead wrote:
Markle wrote:What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?


Perhaps a more relevant question would be: What happens if there is no special persecutor appointed to deal with the issue? The community needs to have confidence in the process and this would go a long way toward resolving any fears that the local authority(s) would sweep it under the rug. If it is deemed to be fair, open and transparent then the likelihood of a peaceful resolution is enhanced. If not, it would be a thumb in the eye of the community and suspicion will again come to the forefront and it is just not necessary.  

What if the victim was a white 17 year old that robbed a store, mouthed-off at a cop, assaulted the cop, tried to grab his gun and then got shot and died?  Would we even be here?  Absolutely not.

I appreciate your point but that scenario is irrelevant here and now . . .let's cross that bridge then but what is the best next steps for the community?

Guest


Guest

lol... that bridge is crossed with little to no notice. Didn't you hear about the recent utah police shooting of another young man?

nadalfan



Joanimaroni wrote:
knothead wrote:
Markle wrote:What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?


Perhaps a more relevant question would be: What happens if there is no special persecutor appointed to deal with the issue? The community needs to have confidence in the process and this would go a long way toward resolving any fears that the local authority(s) would sweep it under the rug. If it is deemed to be fair, open and transparent then the likelihood of a peaceful resolution is enhanced. If not, it would be a thumb in the eye of the community and suspicion will again come to the forefront and it is just not necessary.  

What if the victim was a white 17 year old that robbed a store, mouthed-off at a cop, assaulted the cop, tried to grab his gun and then got shot and died?  Would we even be here?  Absolutely not.



http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/black-cop-killed-innocent-white-man-utah-press-silent/

I agree, the media should also be reporting this. They should be talking about as many questionable police shootings as they can.

Something that really bothers me though, is that some of these same right wing websites and their followers that are claiming the media doesn't cover the shooting of a white kid by a black cop are implying that the police did something wrong. But in the Michael Brown shooting, instead of writing about the police's conduct, like releasing a video that turned out to be irrelevant to the shooting, or stating that multiple eye witnesses saw essentially the same thing, or using an anonymous person's radio show account as the official word of the police, or running with the orbital eye fracture, they imply that Michael Brown had it coming.

We should all be asking questions about the use of excessive force by all police officers.

Addicting info and Raw Story published the story, also demanding the right to know what happened. Look at the difference in the headlines and content from the different sites

Guest


Guest

The real issue should be the police state... but the useful idiots divide us by parroting the race card paradigm.

Yea team..!!

2seaoat



He will be indicted. Perhaps not locally, but Holder has gotten the witness statements.......he would not have visited the city unless he could deliver.....some of this does not require much thought in a chess game, but again checkers rarely has a player looking five moves ahead.

Guest


Guest

Holder ha lies and nothing else

no stress

no stress

nadalfan wrote:
Joanimaroni wrote:
knothead wrote:
Markle wrote:What happens if there is no indictment of the police officer Wilson?

Will some of the posters here apologize for their foul words about police and specifically Wilson?

Will Ferguson rioters rebuild what they have destroyed and stolen?


Perhaps a more relevant question would be: What happens if there is no special persecutor appointed to deal with the issue? The community needs to have confidence in the process and this would go a long way toward resolving any fears that the local authority(s) would sweep it under the rug. If it is deemed to be fair, open and transparent then the likelihood of a peaceful resolution is enhanced. If not, it would be a thumb in the eye of the community and suspicion will again come to the forefront and it is just not necessary.  

What if the victim was a white 17 year old that robbed a store, mouthed-off at a cop, assaulted the cop, tried to grab his gun and then got shot and died?  Would we even be here?  Absolutely not.



http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/black-cop-killed-innocent-white-man-utah-press-silent/

I agree, the media should also be reporting this.  They should be talking about as many questionable police shootings as they can.  

Something that really bothers me though, is that some of these same right wing websites and their followers that are claiming the media doesn't cover the shooting of a white kid by a black cop are implying that the police did something wrong.  But in the Michael Brown shooting, instead of writing about the police's conduct, like releasing a video that turned out to be irrelevant to the shooting, or stating that multiple eye witnesses saw essentially the same thing, or using an anonymous person's radio show account as the official word of the police, or running with the orbital eye fracture, they imply that Michael Brown had it coming.

We should all be asking questions about the use of excessive force by all police officers.

Addicting info and Raw Story published the story, also demanding the right to know what happened.  Look at the difference in the headlines and content from the different sites
LMAO!! Looks like knothead, after stating we will cross that bridge when it happens has turned his mulecart around and decided not to cross that bridge!

2seaoat



If he lies......he could have lied from DC without committing to a trip to Mo. Once he came he was telling folks......I have the power to act........A smart man would not stand before a crowd with little Holder in their hand and say I have the power to act......40 FBI agents have nailed a civil rights indictment......plain and simple, but a clever strategy by the SA is to do a good job on the Grand Jury probable cause hearing, and roll over at trial.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:He will be indicted. Perhaps not locally, but Holder has gotten the witness statements.......he would not have visited the city unless he could deliver.....some of this does not require much thought in a chess game, but again checkers rarely has a player looking five moves ahead.

What a major load of crapola... He's just a big fly on a pile of shit. How did his zimmerman intervention go?

nadalfan



They are still investigating the Zimmerman case..it was reported in the Orlando Sentinel a few days ago

Guest


Guest

How did the black panther with a baton guarding a voting location go?

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:He will be indicted.  Perhaps not locally, but Holder has gotten the witness statements....... he would not have visited the city unless he could deliver .....some of this does not require much thought in a chess game, but again checkers rarely has a player looking five moves ahead.

What exactly could Eric Holder "KNOW HE COULD DELIVER" without having any information? Are you saying that the Attorney General of the United States would lie and bring charges against an innocent person?

Not that I would doubt that happening. He sure hasn't gone out of his way to prosecute the criminals behind IRS, Fast and Furious, AP, NSA, Benghazi and now the illegal prisoner swap where he exchanged a deserter for five, hand chosen Terrorists.

2seaoat



What exactly could Eric Holder "KNOW HE COULD DELIVER" without having any information?

He has already reviewed the witness summaries. The FBI had 40 agents in the field taking evidence. If those summaries were consistent with bringing a civil rights indictment, he shows up. If they were not, he would be silent. This is not rocket science, and every prosecutor in America knows where the investigation is in real time, but most do not have forty highly trained FBI agents in the field.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:What exactly could Eric Holder "KNOW HE COULD DELIVER" without having any information?

He has already reviewed the witness summaries.  The FBI had 40 agents in the field taking evidence.   If those summaries were consistent with bringing a civil rights indictment, he shows up.  If they were not, he would be silent.  This is not rocket science, and every prosecutor in America knows where the investigation is in real time, but most do not have forty highly trained FBI agents in the field.

And you have no clue as to what their findings have been.

My question was, WHAT HAPPENS if there is no indictment? Not the lies you believed were true on day one from someone convicted of filing false police reports and having a warrant out for his arrest.

2seaoat



He should have been arrested like any other person shooting an unarmed person, and he could have made his self defense argument at trial. He was not arrested. There were studies in Wisconsin where there were 140 some police killings of unarmed citizens, and one indictment. Therein is the statistical problem. It will be corrected. American citizens will not die in the streets at the hand of out of control police officers using lethal force against unarmed citizens......that time is rapidly passing.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:He should have been arrested like any other person shooting an unarmed person, and he could have made his self defense argument at trial.  He was not arrested.   There were studies in Wisconsin where there were 140 some police killings of unarmed citizens, and one indictment.   Therein is the statistical problem.   It will be corrected.  American citizens will not die in the streets at the hand of out of control police officers using lethal force against unarmed citizens......that time is rapidly passing.  

Why would he be arrested if no one was certain of a crime being committed?

Once again, what if there is no indictment?  Will you accept the findings and admit that the officer is innocent of any wrongdoing?  Or would you be to stubborn to admit you are wrong?

Please share with us the source that says there were 140 police killings of unarmed citizens in Wisconsin in one year.  By the way, just because they were unarmed, does NOT mean there was no threat.

Why do you hate police so much?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum