The Party Of Family Values

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

Chrissy8 wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

not at all. I think on a different plain.



Love you

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

Chrissy8 wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

not at all. I think on a different plain.



Love you

Slicef18 wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

"well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value."

And what would that "something" of value be when they spend three times more in titty-bars than Democrats or swimming in the Sea of Galilee. Calling themselves "The Party Of Family Values" started during the Reagan Administration. By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever." Nixon only had eight staffers convicted of crimes against their office. Clinton, of course, only had one. Maybe Chrissyate really is on a different plane

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

Slicef18 wrote:

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

While Democrats may be stingy when it come to their own money, they and the Republicans spend our money without restraint. They just spend it on different things like parks and swing sets while the other side spends it on bombs, bullets and jets.

Lurch wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

While Democrats may be stingy when it come to their own money, they and the Republicans spend our money without restraint. They just spend it on different things like parks and swing sets while the other side spends it on bombs, bullets and jets.

Chrissy8 wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

not at all. I think on a different plain.



Love you

thread_bear wrote:

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

dude. your avatar looks like a craigslist ad for a truck stop glory hole.Occam's Razor...

Lurch wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

While Democrats may be stingy when it come to their own money, they and the Republicans spend our money without restraint. They just spend it on different things like parks and swing sets while the other side spends it on bombs, bullets and jets.

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Chrissy8 wrote:well at least republicans are trying to perserve something of value.

I mea we could just all go to the party of NO values, where the only value is "LET GOV" LET GO"

I think you missed the point again.

not at all. I think on a different plain.



Love you

You mean like the rain in Spain? Because I think you meant "PLANE".

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

thread_bear wrote:

newswatcher wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:It was reported today that during the 2008 political conventions, Republicans spent an average $150 per person at strip joints. At the 2008 Democratic convention, Democrats spent an average of $50 per person at the strip joints.
CONCLUSION:
(a) The Republicans are wealthier than the Democrats (or)
(b) The Republicans are hornier than the Democrats. (or)
(c) Being the Party of Family Values, has a deeper interest in those anatomical parts that generate a family.

So this this FINALLY disprove that the Republicans have a war against women!!!!....And Democrats are CHEAP when it's THEIR money!....

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

dude. your avatar looks like a craigslist ad for a truck stop glory hole.Occam's Razor...

LOLOLOL.....I keep wondering what that drill sergeant stuffs in his pie hole besides food......

Nekochan wrote:Slice, I think you should go to Tampa and investigate this issue next week.

Slicef18 wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Slice, I think you should go to Tampa and investigate this issue next week.

\

I find the whole titty-bar issue a strange phenomenon. Grown men (we think) stand around an elevated stage with one or two chrome vertical poles, eagerly holding out their hand of money, waiting for some nude or near nude young woman to come and accept their money for a peek at her parts. No touching or otherwise using her parts for pleasure. I remember when I was around eight years old the Post Office lobby had a gentleman who was legally blind and he had a large variety of candy bars. My brother said, Hey, let['s go in and look at the candy bars. I replied, We don't have any money. He said, we can look. I replied, "That's dumb, I don't have a nickle."

Nekochan wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Slice, I think you should go to Tampa and investigate this issue next week.

\

I find the whole titty-bar issue a strange phenomenon. Grown men (we think) stand around an elevated stage with one or two chrome vertical poles, eagerly holding out their hand of money, waiting for some nude or near nude young woman to come and accept their money for a peek at her parts. No touching or otherwise using her parts for pleasure. I remember when I was around eight years old the Post Office lobby had a gentleman who was legally blind and he had a large variety of candy bars. My brother said, Hey, let['s go in and look at the candy bars. I replied, We don't have any money. He said, we can look. I replied, "That's dumb, I don't have a nickle."

LOL, you're like my daughter. She has no interest in window shopping. If she cannot buy something, she sees no point in looking at stuff.