Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Shinseki out at VA

+5
ZVUGKTUBM
KarlRove
Sal
Wordslinger
TEOTWAWKI
9 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

1Shinseki out at VA Empty Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 12:09 pm

Guest


Guest

Wow, sebelius got years to fix the problems and u guess folks of color don't get the same opportunity as her highness. Obama must be a racist.

2Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 12:17 pm

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Good that fixes everything....now our vets will get healthcare...someday...maybe...before they die....hopefully.

3Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 12:19 pm

Guest


Guest

Not unless he was a doc and going to see all those vets himself.

4Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 12:50 pm

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Shinseki wasn't the problem .. Washington's (both parties) concern for used-up soldiers is nil.

Since WWII, soldiers have been totally expendible -- nobody gives a shit whether they die or go nuts or both.  That's one of the wonderful benefits of having an all-volunteer force.

By the way, the oligarchs are doing their best to eliminate our military services and replace their personnel totally with drones and CONTRACTORS.

Much as idiots like you Pacedog and your Nazi buddy want to make our lousy vet care a partisan issue, the facts are (can you actually handle a fact?), since WWII most all our wars have been fought without any goal of winning.  The game is to stay there, exert American military influence in the region, and make sure we get access to resources we hopefully can steal.

You have to be as naive as you seem to be to believe that our foreign policies under the dems or republicans haven't been dictated by big business, aka "National Interests."

Tell us how our losing, wasted military efforts in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan were "righteous!"

Can't wait for your history lesson ....



Last edited by Wordslinger on 5/30/2014, 12:52 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Mary Katherine told me to ...)

5Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 12:54 pm

Guest


Guest

And word offers nothing to the debate

6Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 1:29 pm

Sal

Sal

There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

7Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 1:52 pm

KarlRove

KarlRove

Sal wrote:There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

Funny how liberals always spin things back to Bush and Bush hasn't occupied the WH since Jan 2009.

8Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 1:54 pm

Guest


Guest

I don't think Shinseki in or out of the VA will change a thing. The man, retired general, served in Army Infantry units. Why not hire a man with a medical administrative background?? Strong and large medical corps in the Army with retirees that could have done the job, possibly, but with government restraints on how medicine is to be "run" we see the real issue is not the man running it but the operations/procedures of a bureaucracy.

9Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:01 pm

KarlRove

KarlRove

SheWrites wrote:I don't think Shinseki in or out of the VA will change a thing. The man, retired general, served in Army Infantry units. Why not hire a man with a medical administrative background?? Strong and large medical corps in the Army with retirees that could have done the job, possibly, but with government restraints on how medicine is to be "run" we see the real issue is not the man running it but the operations/procedures of a bureaucracy.


That would make too much sense.

10Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:14 pm

Guest


Guest

They're all just a bunch of fucking bureaucrats. It must trigger the reptilian brain the second one takes a govt job.

11Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:19 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

KarlRove wrote:
SheWrites wrote:I don't think Shinseki in or out of the VA will change a thing. The man, retired general, served in Army Infantry units.  Why not hire a man with a medical administrative background??  Strong and large medical corps in the Army with retirees that could have done the job, possibly, but with government restraints on how medicine is to be "run" we see the real issue is not the man running it but the operations/procedures of a bureaucracy.  


That would make too much sense.

SOCK PUPPET ALERT!!!!!!

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

12Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:22 pm

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

KarlRove wrote:
Sal wrote:There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

Funny how liberals always spin things back to Bush and Bush hasn't occupied the WH since Jan 2009.

As you've been reminding us since January, 2009.

13Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:24 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Sal wrote:There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

Good and relevant post, Sal.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

14Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:24 pm

Sal

Sal

KarlRove wrote:
Sal wrote:There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

Funny how liberals always spin things back to Bush and Bush hasn't occupied the WH since Jan 2009.

If you don't like the historical context, you can always just ignore it.

That behavior has been well established in conservative circles.

15Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 2:29 pm

Sal

Sal

SheWrites wrote:I don't think Shinseki in or out of the VA will change a thing.


Probably not.

They've already suspended the wait-time tie to performance reviews, so that should make a real difference.

Accountability is demanded, but we have to be very careful not to create perverse incentives when measuring it.

But, his resignation doesn't really have anything to do with solutions.

It's all about collecting scalps, scoring cheap points, and political viability.

That's how DC rolls.

16Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 3:14 pm

Guest


Guest

by Floridatexan Today at 2:22 pm
KarlRove wrote:

Sal wrote:

There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

Funny how liberals always spin things back to Bush and Bush hasn't occupied the WH since Jan 2009.

As you've been reminding us since January, 2009.
----
I do because you liberals keep him in the news

17Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/30/2014, 10:14 pm

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:There's a good bit of irony in all of this.

In 2003, Shinseki went before Congress and told them the truth - that it would take many more troops and resources to fight the misbegotten war that the criminals in the Bush administration were trying to sell to the American people.

For that, he was publicly ridiculed and his military career was virtually destroyed.

Fast forward 11 years, and the criminals who lied us into that travesty have yet to be called to account, and Shinseki is being fired again for his failure to deal with the human cost of an abortion of a war, the architects of which deliberately lowballed as just another element in an infrastucture of lies and deceit.

But, Shinseki must go.

And, so here we are.

You conveniently left out the part where General Shinseki was advocating that he needed HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of troops. As you well know too, General Petraeus was able to win with far fewer troops. Of course, not long after that President Barack Hussein Obama announced his surrender.

As for prosecuting those who lied about Iraq, who do you want to start with first. I have a list here for you to chose from. GO FOR IT!

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”
- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

He praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."
- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,000 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.

And now the Obama administration wants to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew…

18Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 10:13 am

2seaoat



So Mr. Markle.......are you saying that invading Iraq was a good policy decision for the United States? A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

19Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 10:20 am

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:So Mr. Markle.......are you saying that invading Iraq was a good policy decision for the United States?   A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

Clinton thought so

20Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 1:29 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

2seaoat wrote:So Mr. Markle.......are you saying that invading Iraq was a good policy decision for the United States?   A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

He can only answer your question with that overused cut-and-paste that he posts about 7 or 8 times per year.

The Iraq war was one of the most catastrophic foreign policy decisions ever made by a U.S. president. But, you must realize it was made by Dubya, who was the first moron ever elected to the office of POTUS.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

21Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 1:36 pm

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

1) "My answer is bring 'em on." —President George W. Bush, challenging militants attacking U.S. forces in Iraq, July 2, 2003 (Source)

2) "I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." --Vice President Dick Cheney, on the Iraq insurgency, June 20, 2005 (Source)

3) "As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time." —Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, responding to a U.S. soldier serving in Iraq who asked him why troops had to dig through scrap metal to armor vehicles, Dec. 8, 2004 (Source)

4) "My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators." –Vice President Dick Cheney, "Meet the Press," March 16, 2003 (Source)

5) "F**k Saddam, we're taking him out." –President Bush to three U.S. Senators in March 2002, a full year before the Iraq invasion (Source)

6) "Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts, corroborated by many sources, some of them sources of the intelligence services of other countries." –Secretary of State Colin Powell, testifying about Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons capabilities before the United Nations Security Council, Feb. 5, 2003 (Source)

7) "Freedom's untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on looting in Iraq after the U.S. invasion, adding "stuff happens," April 11, 2003 (Source)

Cool "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." –President Bush, standing under a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier, May 2, 2003 (Source)

9) "It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003 (Source)

10) "From a marketing point of view, you don't roll out new products in August." --White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, on why the Bush administration waited until after Labor Day to try to sell the American people on war against Iraq, "New York Times" interview, Sept. 7, 2002 (Source)

11) "We found the weapons of mass destruction." –President Bush, in an interview with Polish television, May 29, 2003 (Source)

12) "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" —President Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, March 25, 2004 (Source)

13) "We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, when asked about weapons of mass destruction in an ABC News interview, March 30, 2003 (Source)

14) "British intelligence has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." –President Bush, 2003 State of the Union Address (Source)

15) "Already, the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations." –President Bush, 2004 State of the Union Address (Source)

16) "It's a slam-dunk case!" –CIA Director George Tenet, discussing WMD and the case for war during a meeting in the Oval Office, Dec. 21, 2002 (Source)

17) "I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are." –White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, July 9, 2003 (Source)

18) "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction, as the core reason." --Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, "Vanity Fair" interview, May 28, 2003 (Source)

19) "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." –National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, on Iraq's nuclear capabilities and the Bush administration's case for war, Sept. 8, 2002 (Source)

20) "Had we to do it over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success, being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day." —President Bush, telling Time magazine that he underestimated the Iraqi resistance, Aug. 2004 (Source)


21) "We know he's been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." –Vice President Dick Cheney, "Meet The Press" March 16, 2003 (Source)

22) "I don't know anybody that I can think of who has contended that the Iraqis had nuclear weapons." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, June 24, 2003 (Source)

23) "In Iraq, a ruthless dictator cultivated weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. He gave support to terrorists, had an established relationship with al Qaeda, and his regime is no more." –Vice President Dick Cheney, Nov. 7, 2003 (Source)

24) "I am not going to give you a number for it because it's not my business to do intelligent work." --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, asked to estimate the number of Iraqi insurgents while testifying before Congress, Feb. 16, 2005 (Source)

25) "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties." —President Bush, discussing the Iraq war with Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson, after Robertson told him he should prepare the American people for casualties (Source)

22Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 1:42 pm

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

I didn't see any quotes listed about WMD made by the Clinton administration....are you still looking them up?

23Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 5/31/2014, 2:19 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Floridatexan wrote:1) "My answer is bring 'em on." —President George W. Bush, challenging militants attacking U.S. forces in Iraq, July 2, 2003 (Source)

2) "I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." --Vice President Dick Cheney, on the Iraq insurgency, June 20, 2005 (Source)

3) "As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time." —Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, responding to a U.S. soldier serving in Iraq who asked him why troops had to dig through scrap metal to armor vehicles, Dec. 8, 2004 (Source)

4) "My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators." –Vice President Dick Cheney, "Meet the Press," March 16, 2003 (Source)

5) "F**k Saddam, we're taking him out." –President Bush to three U.S. Senators in March 2002, a full year before the Iraq invasion (Source)

6) "Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts, corroborated by many sources, some of them sources of the intelligence services of other countries." –Secretary of State Colin Powell, testifying about Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons capabilities before the United Nations Security Council, Feb. 5, 2003 (Source)

7) "Freedom's untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on looting in Iraq after the U.S. invasion, adding "stuff happens," April 11, 2003 (Source)

Cool"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." –President Bush, standing under a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier, May 2, 2003 (Source)

9) "It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003 (Source)

10) "From a marketing point of view, you don't roll out new products in August." --White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, on why the Bush administration waited until after Labor Day to try to sell the American people on war against Iraq, "New York Times" interview, Sept. 7, 2002 (Source)

11) "We found the weapons of mass destruction." –President Bush, in an interview with Polish television, May 29, 2003 (Source)

12) "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" —President Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, March 25, 2004 (Source)

13) "We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, when asked about weapons of mass destruction in an ABC News interview, March 30, 2003 (Source)

14) "British intelligence has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." –President Bush, 2003 State of the Union Address (Source)

15) "Already, the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations." –President Bush, 2004 State of the Union Address (Source)

16) "It's a slam-dunk case!" –CIA Director George Tenet, discussing WMD and the case for war during a meeting in the Oval Office, Dec. 21, 2002 (Source)

17) "I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are." –White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, July 9, 2003 (Source)

18) "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction, as the core reason." --Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, "Vanity Fair" interview, May 28, 2003 (Source)

19) "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." –National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, on Iraq's nuclear capabilities and the Bush administration's case for war, Sept. 8, 2002 (Source)

20) "Had we to do it over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success, being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day." —President Bush, telling Time magazine that he underestimated the Iraqi resistance, Aug. 2004 (Source)


21) "We know he's been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." –Vice President Dick Cheney, "Meet The Press" March 16, 2003 (Source)

22) "I don't know anybody that I can think of who has contended that the Iraqis had nuclear weapons." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, June 24, 2003 (Source)

23) "In Iraq, a ruthless dictator cultivated weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. He gave support to terrorists, had an established relationship with al Qaeda, and his regime is no more." –Vice President Dick Cheney, Nov. 7, 2003 (Source)

24) "I am not going to give you a number for it because it's not my business to do intelligent work." --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, asked to estimate the number of Iraqi insurgents while testifying before Congress, Feb. 16, 2005 (Source)

25) "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties." —President Bush, discussing the Iraq war with Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson, after Robertson told him he should prepare the American people for casualties (Source)


You need to save this cut-and paste and put it up whenever Markle posts his cut-and-paste.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

24Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 6/1/2014, 1:15 am

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:So Mr. Markle.......are you saying that invading Iraq was a good policy decision for the United States?   A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

Not relevant today.

25Shinseki out at VA Empty Re: Shinseki out at VA 6/1/2014, 1:18 am

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
2seaoat wrote:So Mr. Markle.......are you saying that invading Iraq was a good policy decision for the United States?   A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

He can only answer your question with that overused cut-and-paste that he posts about 7 or 8 times per year.

The Iraq war was one of the most catastrophic foreign policy decisions ever made by a U.S. president. But, you must realize it was made by Dubya, who was the first moron ever elected to the office of POTUS.

Because you, or another Progressive, asks for it 7 or 8 times per year.

It wasn't a catastrophic foreign policy decision until President Barack Hussein Obama took office. The results are obvious. Due to President Obama, it is now being taken over by Iran along with the al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Brilliant!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum