John Oliver Presents a Statistically Representative Climate Change Debate

I am watching this show on HBO, I wish we could show the KY senate race piece.......it is a bit raunchy even for here, but boy does it get to the heart of the problem......old white men.

I cannot find a clip on utube on the KY senate race in that it involved a nude male who was not really endowed representing Mitch.....it was hysterical and it finally got to the essence. This show is doing stuff you would never see on comedy central.........I would probably get a vacation from here if I posted it, but it was so fricking true.........but it had nudity.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/you-need-to-watch-john-olivers-hilariously-raunchy-take-on-political-ads/

I guess they needed Mr. Markle for a model.......a shill here a shill there

It's getting harder and harder to believe that 97% of scientists would prostitute themselves and lie just to get a government grant. If it was
27% or 47% I could maybe buy it. But 97%?

Bob 97% of anything is significant. I tried to think it was a one on one argument until late last year and early this year. It is absurd to give any credence to the non scientific conclusions that man's pollution is not contributing to global climate change......In the last 10 years I have been devastated by extreme weather conditions REPEATEDLY, and have no life experiences in my 62 years on this planet to compare to the weather patterns I have experienced during that time frame. When you show the 100 scientist arguing, you realize the absurdity of one on one debate on talk radio and tv.