Teo, the real thing you should worry about is not controlled demolitions and pentagon missiles and shooting up theaters.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

You say so sounds like you got it all figured out so leave me to my illusions and preach our religion to those who care..like I will..If you want to run your BS past me I will give you an answer that i know from what i read..after that expect nothing more..

My "BS" is based on a long conversation I had with my first cousin when she came to my mother's funeral. Following 9-11 she and her husband (whose name is Jeff Greenberg and who is also a jew) spent their days attending the funerals of his employees many of whom were also jews. She broke down in tears telling me how horrific the whole experience was for her and her husband.
Jeff Greenberg's father is Hank Greenberg who at the time was the Chairman and CEO of AIG. I assure you if the jews working in the world trade center had been warned to leave, his son's employees would have gotten the first calls. And they didn't.

Bob wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

You say so sounds like you got it all figured out so leave me to my illusions and preach our religion to those who care..like I will..If you want to run your BS past me I will give you an answer that i know from what i read..after that expect nothing more..

My "BS" is based on a long conversation I had with my first cousin when she came to my mother's funeral. Following 9-11 she and her husband (whose name is Jeff Greenberg and who is also a jew) spent their days attending the funerals of his employees many of whom were also jews. She broke down in tears telling me how horrific the whole experience was for her and her husband.
Jeff Greenberg's father is Hank Greenberg who at the time was the Chairman and CEO of AIG. I assure you if the jews working in the world trade center had been warned to leave, his son's employees would have gotten the first calls. And they didn't.

So you say....hey maybe this is true..

https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/miracle-that-saved-nine-jews-on-911/

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/miracle-that-saved-nine-jews-on-911/

The second blog post down on that page...
_____________________________________
fred johnson says:

false flag of americunt whoreshington dumb cunts niggers and jizzraeli kikes
_____________________________________

Congrats, teo. You've now put yourself in the company of that.

I'm going to bed.

Bob wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/miracle-that-saved-nine-jews-on-911/

The second blog post down on that page...
_____________________________________
fred johnson says:

false flag of americunt whoreshington dumb cunts niggers and jizzraeli kikes
_____________________________________

Congrats, teo. You've now put yourself in the company of that.

I'm going to bed.

Smug bastard strikes and then slithers off to bed

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Smug bastard strikes and then slithers off to bed

yep

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Bob it's not quite that black and white...Mossad had operatives in place in all the key places airport, towers, military, and all they needed the government to do was declare a whole host of drills to hide and confuse their main operation under...

Aha. So it was both the government and the mossad.
But you just pointed out how the government was so stupid and mucked it all up when it blew up the oklahoma city building and shot up the theater and all the rest.

So how come all those idiots working in the government have been able to cover it up? How have they kept any whistleblower from ever spilling the beans?
It sounds like they're dumb as rocks when it's convenient for the "theory" but goddamn brilliant when that's what's convenient for the "theory" too.

It's already been explained to you. It didn't have to be a huge conspiracy; just a few people in key positions, compartmentalized and "need to know".

[quote="Floridatexan"]

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

It's already been explained to you. It didn't have to be a huge conspiracy; just a few people in key positions, compartmentalized and "need to know".

Laughable

[quote="nochain"]

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

It's already been explained to you. It didn't have to be a huge conspiracy; just a few people in key positions, compartmentalized and "need to know".

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. You need to explain why it's laughable.
For openers, we have the testimony of dozens of New York City firefighters who all testified that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged, listing (not even standing straight), and gouged out on the south side (facing where the North Tower fell into it). They have testified that hours before the building collapsed they were convinced that it was just a matter of time before it was going to collapse.
Then you have the supposed "fraudulent" $7 billion insurance claim. Several very large insurance companies were on the hook for that $7 billion.
Insurance companies don't just hand over $7 billion. We all know that because of the aftermath of Ivan and katrina. They try to avoid having to pay every penny whenever there is some reason to wiggle out of it.
According to the tinfoilers, there is a mountain of evidence to prove that the buildings were "imploded". But you will take note that not one employee at one insurance company ever raised any suspicion about this.
So of course that would mean that a helluva lot of people were covering this up on just the insurance angle.
So now we have dozens of firefighters (and hundreds more firefighters who were observing that so-called cover-up) and now hundreds of insurance company employees who were either directly involved in the plot or the coverup.
That's just for starters.
We have all the employees at the WTC and those thousands and thousands of daily office workers. And NOT ONE of those has ever come forward after ten years to say so much as "now that you mention it I did see something suspicious". They didn't notice one goddamn thing when two of the world's largest and tallest skyscrapers were being rigged for "controlled demolition". Not one goddamn person coming forward to reveal one goddamn thing.

So no, this plot is far more than a handful of people and "need to know".
It's so many people involved in this plot and covering it up that it makes my head spin.
But of course this tinfoiler writing to this thread also says these plotters were "stupid". So now we have the most unbelievably amazing conspiracy involving untold thousands of people and not only that but they are "stupid".

As I've said before, the whole goddamn fucking theory is so retarded that it makes the screenplay for Plan 9 From Outer Space look prosaic in comparison. And smart people like the one posting to this thread have actually swallowed this horseshit hook line and sinker.

It's just depressing. There's no other word for it.

[quote="SmugBastard(akaBob)"]

nochain wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

It's already been explained to you. It didn't have to be a huge conspiracy; just a few people in key positions, compartmentalized and "need to know".

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. You need to explain why it's laughable.
For openers, we have the testimony of dozens of New York City firefighters who all testified that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged, listing (not even standing straight), and gouged out on the south side (facing where the North Tower fell into it). They have testified that hours before the building collapsed they were convinced that it was just a matter of time before it was going to collapse.
Then you have the supposed "fraudulent" $7 billion insurance claim. Several very large insurance companies were on the hook for that $7 billion.
Insurance companies don't just hand over $7 billion. We all know that because of the aftermath of Ivan and katrina. They try to avoid having to pay every penny whenever there is some reason to wiggle out of it.
According to the tinfoilers, there is a mountain of evidence to prove that the buildings were "imploded". But you will take note that not one employee at one insurance company ever raised any suspicion about this.
So of course that would mean that a helluva lot of people were covering this up on just the insurance angle.
So now we have dozens of firefighters (and hundreds more firefighters who were observing that so-called cover-up) and now hundreds of insurance company employees who were either directly involved in the plot or the coverup.
That's just for starters.
We have all the employees at the WTC and those thousands and thousands of daily office workers. And NOT ONE of those has ever come forward after ten years to say so much as "now that you mention it I did see something suspicious". They didn't notice one goddamn thing when two of the world's largest and tallest skyscrapers were being rigged for "controlled demolition". Not one goddamn person coming forward to reveal one goddamn thing.

So no, this plot is far more than a handful of people and "need to know".
It's so many people involved in this plot and covering it up that it makes my head spin.
But of course this tinfoiler writing to this thread also says these plotters were "stupid". So now we have the most unbelievably amazing conspiracy involving untold thousands of people and not only that but they are "stupid".

As I've said before, the whole goddamn fucking theory is so retarded that it makes the screenplay for Plan 9 From Outer Space look prosaic in comparison. And smart people like the one posting to this thread have actually swallowed this horseshit hook line and sinker.

It's just depressing. There's no other word for it.

Plenty of people have spoken out, and some of them have disappeared under mysterious circumstances, or, like Dan Rather, have lost their careers. If you think about it at all, the entire Bush presidency was like this...very few people were willing to speak out against his policies.

You challenged someone on this forum recently about the definition of "neocon". Think about what that is. Now tell me that a plan that was in the making over a period of years couldn't be brought about by a few well-placed people. It's the government story that's ludicrous.

[quote="SmugBastard(akaBob)"][quote="nochain"]

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. .

The most critical element for the arguement AGAINST a conspiracy is, of course, the human element. People talk. For a technical look at why 9/11 occurred the way it did you might find the following article interesting:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

[quote="nochain"][quote="SmugBastard(akaBob)"]

nochain wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. .

The most critical element for the arguement AGAINST a conspiracy is, of course, the human element. People talk. For a technical look at why 9/11 occurred the way it did you might find the following article interesting:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

Is 'Bob' really Jesse Ventura?...He tried to capitalize on this nonesense and well...looked like a bigger fool than dancing around in a WWF ring...There is never any evidence that will satisify a conspiracy believer...why because their allegations/rants/flashbacks etc., do not need to contain facts...Jesse also denied being punched out over similar rants at a Seal Funeral...said he was moving to Mexico....wonder if he has or not...

Floridatexan wrote:[

Plenty of people have spoken out, and some of them have disappeared under mysterious circumstances, or, like Dan Rather, have lost their careers.

Dan Rather was a media anchor who, while the whole thing was unfolding, made an off-handed remark that "it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
It was reminiscent of that to me too. Because we'd ALL seen buildings fall down when they were being demolished. We had NEVER any of us seen buildings fall down when jumbo jets hit them going 500 mph. So of course it was not "reminiscent" of that since it aint happened till this.
Dan Rather's career tanked because he reported a false story as a network news anchor. Not because he said the collapses were "reminiscent" of a demolition.

And of course Dan Rather is absolutely not an example of what I was referring to anyway. What I was referring to is all the thousands of people who would have had to know from personal involvement either in the plot itself or covering up the plot that it WAS a plot. And as I keep pointing out over and over and over and over and over again, NOT ONE of those people HAS EVER come forward. NOT ONE. ZERO. ZILCH. NONE.
Not even after ten fricking years.

May I ask a question at this point. I've noticed that the two usernames "nochain" and "newswatcher" always post together. Is there some reason for that exactly? lol

newswatcher wrote:
Is 'Bob' really Jesse Ventura?...He tried to capitalize on this nonesense

You nailed me. Yes I'm really Jesse Ventura. And yes I'm capitalizing on this nonsense bigtime. I figure that shortly I will have tv shows and governships and book contracts just like he did. But since I'm him I guess I don't need that since I already have it. lol

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

newswatcher wrote:
Is 'Bob' really Jesse Ventura?...He tried to capitalize on this nonesense

You nailed me. Yes I'm really Jesse Ventura. And yes I'm capitalizing on this nonsense bigtime. I figure that shortly I will have tv shows and governships and book contracts just like he did. But since I'm him I guess I don't need that since I already have it. lol

Yep, Bob is the Comater advocate (from the "forgettable" movie Abraxas)

[quote="nochain"][quote="SmugBastard(akaBob)"]

nochain wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. .

The most critical element for the arguement AGAINST a conspiracy is, of course, the human element. People talk. For a technical look at why 9/11 occurred the way it did you might find the following article interesting:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

I read the Popular Mechanics article, along with many others. People don't talk if they're afraid of being killed (or worse...if they're afraid something will happen to one of their loved ones).

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:[

Plenty of people have spoken out, and some of them have disappeared under mysterious circumstances, or, like Dan Rather, have lost their careers.

Dan Rather was a media anchor who, while the whole thing was unfolding, made an off-handed remark that "it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
It was reminiscent of that to me too. Because we'd ALL seen buildings fall down when they were being demolished. We had NEVER any of us seen buildings fall down when jumbo jets hit them going 500 mph. So of course it was not "reminiscent" of that since it aint happened till this.
Dan Rather's career tanked because he reported a false story as a network news anchor. Not because he said the collapses were "reminiscent" of a demolition.

And of course Dan Rather is absolutely not an example of what I was referring to anyway. What I was referring to is all the thousands of people who would have had to know from personal involvement either in the plot itself or covering up the plot that it WAS a plot. And as I keep pointing out over and over and over and over and over again, NOT ONE of those people HAS EVER come forward. NOT ONE. ZERO. ZILCH. NONE.
Not even after ten fricking years.

You are misinformed. It wouldn't take thousands of people.

Here (why people reject the evidence)

http://tvnewslies.org/html/refusing_the_9_11_evidence.html

People speaking out:

http://world911truth.org/category/news/specialists-challenge-the-official-story/

Floridatexan wrote:

You are misinformed. It wouldn't take thousands of people.

I've already outlined as clear as day and in the most logical terms why exactly there would have necessarily had to be thousands of people who would had knowledge of it in some way. You just don't want to listen.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:This is the most dangerous man in the world and he's dead......

Thomas Robert Malthus
(1766-1834 )


Thomas Malthus argued that because of the natural human urge to reproduce human population increases geometrically (1, 2, 4, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, etc.). However, food supply, at most, can only increase arithmetically (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc.). Therefore, since food is an essential component to human life, population growth in any area or on the planet, if unchecked, would lead to starvation. However, Malthus also argued that there are preventative checks and positive checks on population that slow its growth and keep the population from rising exponentially for too long, but still, poverty is inescapable and will continue.

http://www.suu.edu/faculty/berri/GalorWeilAER1999.pdf

We are past the "Malthusian period" of human history.

[quote="Floridatexan"][quote="nochain"]

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

nochain wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

SmugBastard(akaBob) wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Laughable

But don't just leave it at that. .

The most critical element for the arguement AGAINST a conspiracy is, of course, the human element. People talk. For a technical look at why 9/11 occurred the way it did you might find the following article interesting:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

I read the Popular Mechanics article, along with many others. People don't talk if they're afraid of being killed (or worse...if they're afraid something will happen to one of their loved ones).

If that is so, then why haven't all those folks with "inside knowledge and expertise" that have talked (for their 15 minutes of fame) still running around good old planet earth in apparently good health?

No one who had any first hand personal knowledge of the supposed "plot" has come forward with anything. And neither have any first hand witnesses to any of it come forward either.
What the tinfoilers are referring to are people who had no personal involvement with "it" coming forward to give so-called "expert" opinions.
No one with personal involvement with it has come forward simply because no one had any personal involvement with "it" because of course "it" did not happen. If "it" had indeed happened "it" is so big in scope that some actual witness to something would have come forward a long time ago.