Uh oh...ONCE AGAIN SCIENCE speaks: Updated Global Temperature: No global warming for 17 years, 6 months – (No Warming for 210 Months)

PkrBum wrote:It remains a theory no matter how  loudly you shout down those that disagree. The hypothesis is tested by model and observation. The data must MUST be openly peer reviewed and the models repeatable. See my links above for a couple of the many variables and their impact on the current models. I've listed many others many times.

Here we see someone exhibiting the fact that they don't know what the word 'theory' means.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:It remains a theory no matter how  loudly you shout down those that disagree. The hypothesis is tested by model and observation. The data must MUST be openly peer reviewed and the models repeatable. See my links above for a couple of the many variables and their impact on the current models. I've listed many others many times.

Here we see someone exhibiting the fact that they don't know what the word 'theory' means.

Then perhaps you should quit posting so your ignorance isn't on display.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ljy6PTbX9I

  

PSA the science of the new age of enlightened progressivism...

Political Scientific Alchemy.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBI-pBJg7aI

 

2seaoat wrote:Mr Markle cannot get stuff right in his own field of alleged expertise where he claims he teaches.  No wonder most real estate agents are ditzy blondes who do not even know what a 1031 like kind exchange is.....Markle taught them.........

Sorry 97% of science is in consensus, and 3% of hocus pocus disagree.   It is obvious we are in the grips of climate change and man has a role in that contribution to the same.

Please note that the other denier of climate change PK thinks that Clinton disarmed military bases, and after a multitude of veterans corrected him, he was silent as to his nonsensical post, which honestly has been a trend......he must be spiking his gatoraide.

You have yet to show us the source of your 97% figure.

Once again:

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Mr Markle cannot get stuff right in his own field of alleged expertise where he claims he teaches.  No wonder most real estate agents are ditzy blondes who do not even know what a 1031 like kind exchange is.....Markle taught them.........

Sorry 97% of science is in consensus, and 3% of hocus pocus disagree.   It is obvious we are in the grips of climate change and man has a role in that contribution to the same.

Please note that the other denier of climate change PK thinks that Clinton disarmed military bases, and after a multitude of veterans corrected him, he was silent as to his nonsensical post, which honestly has been a trend......he must be spiking his gatoraide.

You have yet to show us the source of your 97% figure.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.[118]

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm

And all those creating data admitted to fudging the facts.

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Mr Markle cannot get stuff right in his own field of alleged expertise where he claims he teaches.  No wonder most real estate agents are ditzy blondes who do not even know what a 1031 like kind exchange is.....Markle taught them.........

Sorry 97% of science is in consensus, and 3% of hocus pocus disagree.   It is obvious we are in the grips of climate change and man has a role in that contribution to the same.

Please note that the other denier of climate change PK thinks that Clinton disarmed military bases, and after a multitude of veterans corrected him, he was silent as to his nonsensical post, which honestly has been a trend......he must be spiking his gatoraide.

You have yet to show us the source of your 97% figure.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.[118]

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm





I honestly wonder what sorts of self-delusion must go on in the mind of a GOP supporter (quote below).  You really have to suspend all common sense in order to swallow that pill.   Here we have NASA, wikipedia, a 97% consensus among the world scientific community.  Nope.  GOP supporters ignore that.  But show them a website ran by a Rush Limbaugh underling and an article written by a guy with a bachelor of arts in "classics" who calls himself "Lord Chrisopher Monckton", and you got yourself some good science right there!

KarlRove wrote:And all those creating data admitted to fudging the facts.

boards of FL wrote:Everyone point and laugh at the GOP supporters!  Point and laugh at the truther, flat-earthers!

I show you an analysis from MIT of the models w the underlying scientific advance of understanding... you point and laugh.

I point out the many other variables and our limited interpretation of them... you point and laugh. I think we're done here.

It's you and seagoat portraying the flat-earther in this debate.

Anyone believing in global warming needs a frontal lobotomy.

Fuzzy math and fuzzy science - the preferred tools of the left agenda.

Anyone read the research of Professor Christie of the University of Alabama at Huntsville? Or McNider?

Here's something to consider from them.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303945704579391611041331266

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:Everyone point and laugh at the GOP supporters!  Point and laugh at the truther, flat-earthers!

I show you an analysis from MIT of the models w the underlying scientific advance of understanding... you point and laugh.

I point out the many other variables and our limited interpretation of them... you point and laugh. I think we're done here.

It's you and seagoat portraying the flat-earther in this debate.

Yeah, bra! Like, totally! There may be, like, a consensus among the world scientific community, bra, but, like, dude....dude! Then there is this article or something. That one article, like, totally invalidates the consensus of the world scientific community. Totally, bra. These dumb scientists just need to like, read that article or something, bra. Yeah, bra. Only these statist sheeple would be so, like, gullible to side with the world scientific community. Yeah, bra.

2seaoat wrote:Mr Markle cannot get stuff right in his own field of alleged expertise where he claims he teaches.  No wonder most real estate agents are ditzy blondes who do not even know what a 1031 like kind exchange is.....Markle taught them.........

Sorry 97% of science is in consensus, and 3% of hocus pocus disagree.   It is obvious we are in the grips of climate change and man has a role in that contribution to the same.

Please note that the other denier of climate change PK thinks that Clinton disarmed military bases, and after a multitude of veterans corrected him, he was silent as to his nonsensical post, which honestly has been a trend......he must be spiking his gatoraide.

OK...Seaoat...that about tears it. I'm blonde, but I'm not "ditzy". And I do know what a Starker exchange is, although I haven't really thought about it for years.

PK believes if any alternative theory is out there(flat earth society) that the 97% scientific data and consensus can never be PROVEN, because there is an alternative theory. The question should be, who is driving the alternative theory, and for what purpose? PK denies the truth, and takes his usual nihilist relative position.....nothing really matters, so why give any credence to the data and the 97% scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that man's input is significant.

Yes when 97% of the scientific community is in consensus there is no political maneuvering that is driving that consensus.

The untermensch theory of last century must be resurrected because the untermensch are stupid.

Therefore the untermensch must be suppressed for their creationist and flat earth beliefs that they must believe if they disagree with the 97% scientific community consensus.

*****SARCASTIC SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqBPMeMd0o

 

ICE AGE!

http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/6540/20140407/deserts-absorb-more-carbon-dioxide-previously-assumed.htm

2seaoat wrote:PK believes if any alternative theory is out there(flat earth society) that the 97% scientific data and consensus can never be PROVEN, because there is an alternative theory. The question should be, who is driving the alternative theory, and for what purpose? PK denies the truth, and takes his usual nihilist relative position.....nothing really matters, so why give any credence to the data and the 97% scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that man's input is significant.

It's comical really... I've now listed three recent advances that each reflect better understanding of key elements in the models that are used to prop up the agw theory. Oceans, volcanoes, and deserts. But it's me that's the science denier... lol.

Stop that! They have progressive liberal scientific consensus in this matter... You... You... Flat earther!

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBEHFFnV3RY

 

Most all the so-called scientists in the world are all part of this global warming conspiracy because they want to get a government grant from obama to further the cause of communism which is the only thing that's taught in college. It's that simple.
The real scientists,  Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin,  are too smart for this.

As soon as I receive my $100 billion grant to study how man made global warming caused the end of the last ice age I'm joining the global warming consensus also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAUYSFo1ndI

  

http://www.commdiginews.com/environment/sunspots-2014-march-is-another-record-breaking-month-13611/

Another new solar sunspot record peak of 73.2 was set for Cycle 24 last month. It smashed the old 68.9 record peak set the previous month.

In a big surprise, the number is now over six spots higher than the first sunspot peak set in early 2012 and will probably go higher. A secondary peak above the first this much is almost unheard of.

The new sunspot peak is unusual for two conflicting reasons:

1. The secondary peak is higher than the first 2. Current physics suggests the solar cycle should be weakening

Conflicting signals coming from the sun muddles how it might affect earth’s future climate. A more active sun will have a warming effect. A less active sun, predicted by most solar physicists, will have a cooling effect.

The sun hasn’t decided what it wants to do yet.

Nobody here owns an electric car and nobody here is gonna buy an electric car for the foreseeable future.  If anybody WAS gonna buy one it would be me and I aint buying one cause it aint practical.
And even if we did buy electric cars,  we're still pumping carbon into the air to make the electricity.

So who cares if manmade global warming is real or it's a commie plot.  Even if it is real,  you would have to be a retard to actually believe that anything can or will be done to prevent it.

Bob wrote:Nobody here owns an electric car and nobody here is gonna buy an electric car for the foreseeable future.  If anybody WAS gonna buy one it would be me and I aint buying one cause it aint practical.
And even if we did buy electric cars,  we're still pumping carbon into the air to make the electricity.

So who cares if manmade global warming is real or it's a commie plot.  Even if it is real,  you would have to be a retard to actually believe that anything can or will be done to prevent it.

That's why I need a $100 billion grant to study the man made thaw of the last ice age.

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAD6Obi7Cag

  

Make it a couple of trillion dollars and I'll divert most of it into FTL research.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE3bph7r5pQ

  

Forget all that commie propaganda. Everything you ever wanna know about global warming is on this page...

https://www.google.com/search?q=is+global+warming+a+hoax+rush+limbaugh&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb